dc.identifier.citation |
Bezzina, F. and J. Spiteri (2005). Access for All; Design Guidelines National Commission Persons with Disability. Cullen, M. (2006). Improving Transport Accessibility for All; Guide to Good Practice, France: OECD Publications Disability in Bangladesh: A Situation Analysis”. World Bank. Retrieved 20 April 2016. Fitzgerald, J., Shaunesey, D., Stern, S., 2000. The effect of education programs on paratransit demand of people with disabilities. Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract. 34 (4), 261–285. Joyce, M., and R. Dunn. 2010. “A Methodology for Measuring Public Transport Accessibility to Employment – A Case Study.” Auckland, NZ. Transportation Research Record: 5-6. Malhotra, K. (2010). Accessibility and Universal Design; Implications for Public Transport and the Built Environment. United Nations Development Programme, Kuala Lumpur McKee, C. (2010) ‘A market-based approach to inclusive mobility’, Paper delivered at the 12th International Conference on Mobility and Transport for Elderly and Disabled Persons (TRANSED 2010), 2–4 June, Hong Kong Michael Peck, “Barriers to Using Fixed-Route Public Transit for Older Adults.” Green House Gas Emission Impacts of Car Sharing in North America No. CA-MTI- 10-2402 (2010): 1-235 66 | P a g e Survey on the Public Transport Needs of Persons with Disabilities Survey Report (Social Sciences Research Center the University of Hong Kong 15th January, 2007 Transport for London – Annual Report and Statement of Accounts 2009/10 United Nations, (2007). Accessibility; A guiding principle of the Convention World Report on Disability, World Health Organization and World Bank (2011), p. 28. Project ACTION. Combined Research Results. National Easter Seal Society, Washington, D.C., 1990. Hardman, M. L., C. J. Drew, M. W. Egan, and B. Wolf. The Human Exceptionality. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, Mass., 1990. Coburn, N., C. Martin, R. Thompson, and D. Norstrom. Guidelines for Improvements to Transit Accessibility for People with Disabilities. DOT-T-93-04. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1992. Crain-Revis Associated. Handbook Describing Low Cost Concepts and Techniques to Make Public Transportation More Accessible for Visually and Hearing Impaired People. DTM 60-81-72903. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1982. Fitzpatrick, M. E., B. Barkow, and J. Beattie. Intercity Travel and the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Traveler: An Analysis of the Current State of Accessibility. TP9839E. Transport Canada, 1989. 67 | P a g e Uslan, M. M., A. F. Peck, W. R. Wiener, and A. Stern. Access to Mass Transit for Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers. American Foundation for the Blind, New York, N.Y., 1990. Rutenberg, U. Development of a Portable Communicator / Translator Prototype. TP10556E. Transport Canada, July 1990. Richesin, C., G. Grace, M. Iantkow, and T. K. Gillies. Access Needs of Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers in Transportation Terminals: A Study and Design Guidelines. TP9048E. Transport Canada, 1987. Richesin, C., G. Grace, M. Iantkow, and T. K. Gillies. Design Guidelines for Meeting the Access Needs of Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers in Transportation. TP10067E. Transport Canada, 1989. Moreyne, M. Integrated Communication, Information and Security Systems (ICISS) for Visually and Hearing Impaired People—A Transportation Application. TP10187E. Transport Canada, 1991. Moreyne, M., A. Bouiron, and T. Smith. The Visual Communication Network: An Integrated Communication, Information and Security Bailey, L. (2004) Aging Americans: Stranded without Options, Surface TransportationPolicyProject2004, http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/aging_strande d.pdf,last accessed 7 April 2011 Beresford, H. (2004) Helping people to help themselves, http://www.ddpuk.org/frontline.pdf, last accessed 7 April 2011 68 | P a g e Boareto, R. (2007) ‘The Brazilian Urban Accessibility Program of the Ministry of Cities “Brazil Accessible”‘, Ministry of Cities, Brazil, http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/policy/transed2007 -pages-1112-409.htm, last accessed 28 April 2011 J. Gandolfi and C. Mitchell (2010) Maintaining Safe Mobility for the Ageing Population, the Role of the Private Car, Report produced by RAC Foundation London |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Disability will be experienced by most people at certain points of life, either in personal
form or in forms of family or friends. Approximately 11.5 million (19% of the entire
population) are currently disabled in the UK, Over one in five of those reporting a disability
experience difficulties when using transport. This can lead to a massive impact on the
individual, making it difficult or impossible in some cases to access jobs, voluntary work,
go shopping, attend educational institutions, meet friends and take holidays. The number
of disabled people is expected to increase over time, a trend largely driven by an increasing
number of people over the state pension age.
In Bangladesh a range of 9-16% of people are inflicted with disabilities. These numbers
come from three surveys that use up-to-date methods and have shown how they got their
results. Transportation is a critical arrangement issue for those with incapacities. To resolve
this problem, the existing condition and the perspective of the disabled people is a major
component in mitigating the problem and facilitate the movement of these people. The
objective to review the assisting facilities available for the disabled in the developed world
and to develop models that will indicate whether a disabled person prefers policy
implementation (Less expensive fare, Travel time reduction, Safety and comfort
improvement, Stoppage points closer to destination) or infrastructure development
(Dedicated seats, Para-transit, Improved sidewalks and street signs, Trained aiding staff)
to solve transportation problems.
To establish the relationship between solution preference and socio-economic, disability
background and travel pattern of the disabled people, logistic regression model was used.
Comprehensive feedback was gathered from the disabled individuals regarding the
characteristics mentioned above and analysis was performed for the measurement of
significant factors that affect the solution preference.
vii
The result of this study suggests that different socioeconomic, demographic, disability
background properties and travel pattern factors play an important role in selecting
different solution preference. For example, from our study, we have found that the younger
people prefer Policy Implementation as an effective solution to increase ease of movement.
The people who frequently travel by bus prefer policy implementation to a greater degree
compared to the people who use other modes of transportation. With the increase in
personal monthly income, there is a noticeable increase in preference towards
Infrastructure Development. With the increase in average daily transportation cost, there is
a similar noticeable increase in preference towards infrastructure development. |
en_US |