Seismic Performance Evaluation of Essential Facilities Building in Dhaka City by Inelastic Time History Analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahmed, Md. Sabbir
dc.contributor.author Lodi, Farzad Khan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-11T07:03:08Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-11T07:03:08Z
dc.date.issued 2012-11-15
dc.identifier.citation Alimoradi, A., Naeim, F., and Pezeshk, S. 2004. GA-based selection and scaling of strong motion records for structural design. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, on CD-ROM, Vancouver, Canada, Paper 246, 15 p. Atkinson, G.M. 2009. Earthquake time histories compatible with the 2005 National Building Code of Canada uniform hazard spectrum. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36: 991-1000. Amiri-Hormozaki, K. 2003. Effects of scaling of earthquake excitations on dynamic response of reinforced concrete frame buildings. M.A.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. Applied Technology Council, ATC-40, 1996, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Volume 1-2, Redwood City, California. Beyer, K., and Bommer, J. 2007. Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11:13-45. Bangladesh National Building Code [BNBC 1993] “Housing and Building Research Institute, Bangladesh Standard and Testing Institution,” Dhaka, Bangladesh. City of Los Angeles (COLA), 1995, Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings and Concrete Frame Buildings with Masonry Infills, January 31, 1995. Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. (2004). “Period-Height Relationship for Existing European Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 93-119. Calvi, G.M. (1999). “A Displacement-Based Approach for Vulnerability Evaluation of Classes of Buildings”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 411-438. Chopra, A.K. [1995] “Dynamics of Structures; Theory an applications to Earthquake Engineering,” Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Chopra A.K. and Goel R.K., [1999] “Capacity Demand Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDOF Systems, PEER Report 1999/02,” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley. Dancer, E. 2003. Seismic drift demands in reinforced concrete structures. M.A.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. References 47 Evaluation of pushover analysis procedures for frame structure a thesis submitted to the graduate school of natural and applied sciences of Middle East technical university by sermin-oguz. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356. Gasparini, D.A., and Vanmarcke, E.H. 1976. SIMQKE: A program for artificial motion generation. User's manual and documentation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Izzuddin B.A. [1991] “Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Framed Structures,” PhD Thesis, Imperial College, University of London, London. Izzuddin B.A. [2001] “Conceptual issues in geometrically nonlinear analysis of 3D framed structures,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 191, pp. 1029- 1053 Kappos and Konstantinidis (1999) “Statistical analysis of confined high strength concrete,” Materials and Structures, Vol. 32, pp. 734-748. Jeong S.H. and Elnashai A.S. 2004. Analytical and Experimental Seismic Assessment of Irregular RC Buildings. Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Krawinkler H. and Seneviratna G.D.P.K., 1998, Pros and Cons of a Pushover Analysis of Seismic Performance Evaluation, Engineering Structures, Vol.20, 452- 464. Kalkan, E. and Chopra, A.K. 2010. Practical guidelines to select and scale earthquake records for nonlinear response history analysis of structures. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2010-1068, Menlo Park, California, 124 p. Katsanos, E.I., Sextos, A.G., and Manolis, G.D. 2010. Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30: 157-169 Lestuzzi, P., Schwab, P., Koller, M., and Lacave, C. 2004. How to choose earthquake recordings for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, on CD-ROM, Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 1241, 13 p. Lew, M., Naeim, F., Hudson, M.B., and Korin, B.O. 2008. Challenges in specifying ground motions for design of tall buildings in high seismic regions of the United States. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 8p. References 48 Lin, L. 2008. Development of improved intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. Lin, L., Naumoski, N., Saatcioglu, M., Foo, S., and Booth, E. 2010. Selection of seismic excitations for nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering (under review). Monti G. and Nuti C. (1992) “Nonlinear cyclic behavior of reinforcing bars including buckling,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 12, pp. 3268-3284. Menegotto M. and Pinto P.E. (1973) “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending,” Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 15-22. Malaga-Qhuquitaype, C., Bommer, J., Pinho, R., and Stafford, P. 2008. Selection and scaling of ground-motion records for nonlinear response-history analysis based on equivalent SDOF systems. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, on CD-ROM, Beijing, China, 8 p. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., and Park, R. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8): 1804-1849. Madas P. and Elnashai A.S. (1992) “A new passive confinement model for transient analysis of reinforced concrete structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 21, pp. 409-431. Naeim, F., and Lew Marshall. 1995. On the use of design spectrum compatible time histories. Earthquake Spectra, 11(1): 111-127. Naumoski, N. 2001. Program SYNTH – Generation of artificial accelerograms compatible with a target spectrum. User's manual, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. Nassar A.A. and Krawinkler H., 1991, Seismic Demands for SDOF and MDOF Systems, Report No.95, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University. Newmark, N.M., and Hall, W.J. 1982 Earthquake spectra and design. EERI Monograph 3, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Berkeley, California. “PERIODS OF VIBRATION FOR DISPLACEMENT-BASED ASSESSMENT OF RC BUILDINGS” A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master degree in EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING By HELEN CROWLEY July 2003. References 49 Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., Calvi, G.M, (1996) “Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges” Wiley – Interscience. SeismoArtif (2012). Available from URL: http://www.seismosoft.com. SeismoStruct (2011) “Computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures” (online). Available from URL: http://www.seismosoft.com. Spacone, E., (2001) “A module for Analysis and Design of Segmental Prestressed Concrete Bridges (CASI-TR-01-04),” Final report of a CASI FY00 Technology Transfer Grant. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado Advanced Software Institute. Tremblay, R., and Atkinson, G.M. 2001. Comparative study of the inelastic seismic demand of eastern and western Canadian sites. Earthquake Spectra, 17(2): 333-358. Time History Analysis of structure for earthquake loading by wavelet network, A. Heidari∗a and E. Salajeghehb A University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran b Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1162
dc.description Supervised by Mohammad Shafiqual Alam, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), Islamic University Of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.description.abstract Structures suffer significant inelastic deformation under a strong earthquake and dynamic characteristics of the structure change with time, so investigating the performance of a structure requires inelastic analytical procedures accounting for these features. Inelastic analytical procedures help to understand the actual behavior of structures by identifying failure modes and the potential for progressive collapse. Among the various inelastic procedures, the inelastic time history analysis is the most accurate method to predict the force and deformation demands at various components of the structure and hence, the application of inelastic time history analysis to evaluate the seismic performance of Secretariat Clinic Building located at the Secretariat of Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka is the focus of this thesis. Due to the unavailability of any strong ground motion record applicable for Dhaka city in the literature, artificial time history record generated based on response spectrum of Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC,1993) has been used for analysis purpose in nonlinear finite element package, SeismoStruct-V5.2.2 (2011). The analysis reveals that the case study building possesses much greater stability in the longitudinal direction compared to the shorter direction in terms of energy dissipation capacity. It was also observed that storey sway mechanism develops in the bottom and top floors in both the directions under the input artificial time history records which may be attributed to the open ground floor for parking purposes and reduced steel area in columns at top floor from gravity load considerations. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject Inelastic time history analysis, inter-storey drift, storey sway mechanism, strong motion en_US
dc.title Seismic Performance Evaluation of Essential Facilities Building in Dhaka City by Inelastic Time History Analysis en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics