Analysis of Bimorph Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Attached With a Cantilever Beam Under Excitation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Alam, Syed Sifat
dc.contributor.author Rhythm, Ahnaf Sharaf
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-19T09:35:23Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-19T09:35:23Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03-30
dc.identifier.citation [1] H. G. Yeo and S. Trolier-McKinstry, “Effect of piezoelectric layer thickness and poling conditions on the performance of cantilever piezoelectric energy harvesters on Ni foils,” Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical, vol. 273, pp. 90–97, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.02.019. [2] C. R. Bowen, H. A. Kim, P. M. Weaver, and S. Dunn, “Piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials and structures for energy harvesting applications,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 7, no. 1. Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 25–44, 2014, doi: 10.1039/c3ee42454e. [3] I. Jafer, P. Stack, and K. MacNamee, “Design of new power management circuit for light energy harvesting system,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 3, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.3390/s16030270. [4] J. Siang, M. H. Lim, and M. Salman Leong, “Review of vibration-based energy harvesting technology: Mechanism and architectural approach,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 42, no. 5. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp. 1866–1893, Apr. 01, 2018, doi: 10.1002/er.3986. [5] J. W. Yi, W. Y. Shih, and W. H. Shih, “Effect of length, width, and mode on the mass detection sensitivity of piezoelectric unimorph cantilevers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 1680–1686, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1063/1.1427403. [6] L. Jin, S. Gao, and X. Zhang, “The effect of the beam shapes on the doubly-clamped piezoelectric energy harvester,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1361–1374, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10483-019-2513-7. [7] K. Morimoto, I. Kanno, K. Wasa, and H. Kotera, “High-efficiency piezoelectric energy harvesters of c-axis-oriented epitaxial PZT films transferred onto stainless steel cantilevers,” Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 428–432, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.06.028. [8] J. Baker, S. Roundy, and P. P. Wright, “Alternative Geometries for Increasing Power Density in Vibration Energy Scavenging for Wireless Sensor Networks.” [9] G. Zhang, S. Gao, H. Liu, and S. Niu, “A low frequency piezoelectric energy harvester with trapezoidal cantilever beam: theory and experiment,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 3457–3466, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00542-016-3224-5. [10] M. Arefi and A. M. Zenkour, “A simplified shear and normal deformations nonlocal theory for bending of functionally graded piezomagnetic sandwich nanobeams in magneto-thermo-electric environment,” Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 624–651, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1099636216652581. [11] M. Arefi and A. M. Zenkour, “Vibration and bending analysis of a sandwich microbeam with two integrated piezo-magnetic face-sheets,” Composite Structures, vol. 159, pp. 479–490, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.088. [12] M. Arefi and A. M. Zenkour, “Wave propagation analysis of a functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic nanobeam rest on Visco-Pasternak foundation,” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 79, pp. 51–62, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.01.004. 51 [13] M. Arefi and A. M. Zenkour, “Size-dependent vibration and bending analyses of the piezomagnetic three-layer nanobeams,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, vol. 123, no. 3, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00339-017-0801-0. [14] Mohammad Arefi, “Mohammad Arefi / A complete set of equations for piezo-magneto-elastic analysis of a functionally graded thick shell of revolution,” 2014. [15] S. Saxena, R. Sharma, and B. D. Pant, “Piezoelectric layer length and thickness variation effects on displacement, von-Mises stress and electric potential generated by cantilever type piezoelectric energy harvester,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, vol. 30, pp. 23–27, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.747. [16] M. G. Vasundhara, M. Senthilkumar, and G. K. Kalavathi, “A distributed parametric model of shape memory alloy-based resonant frequency tunable cantilevered PZT energy harvester with tip mass,” ISSS Journal of Micro and Smart Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–24, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41683-019-00034-0. [17] S. Paquin and Y. St-Amant, “Improving the performance of a piezoelectric energy harvester using a variable thickness beam,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 19, no. 10, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105020. [18] A. Damya, E. Abbaspour Sani, and G. Rezazadeh, “An innovative piezoelectric energy harvester using clamped–clamped beam with proof mass for WSN applications,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 3203–3211, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00542-018-3890-6. [19] S. P. Matova, M. Renaud, M. Jambunathan, M. Goedbloed, and R. van Schaijk, “Effect of length/width ratio of tapered beams on the performance of piezoelectric energy harvesters,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 22, no. 7, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075015. [20] A. R. Reddy, M. Umapathy, D. Ezhilarasi, and U. Gandhi, “Improved energy harvesting from vibration by introducing cavity in a cantilever beam,” JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 3057–3066, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1077546314558498. [21] R. Usharani, G. Uma, and M. Umapathy, “Design of high output broadband piezoelectric energy harvester with double tapered cavity beam,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 343–351, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40684-016-0043-1. [22] Y. Liao and H. A. Sodano, “Optimal placement of piezoelectric material on a cantilever beam for maximum piezoelectric damping and power harvesting efficiency,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 21, no. 10, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105014. [23] F. Botta, D. Dini, C. Schwingshackl, L. di Mare, and G. Cerri, “Optimal placement of piezoelectric plates to control multimode vibrations of a beam,” Advances in Acoustics and Vibration, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/905160. [24] C. Spier, J. C. Bruch, J. M. Sloss, S. Adali, and I. S. Sadek, “Placement of multiple piezo patch sensors and actuators for a cantilever beam to maximize frequencies and frequency gaps,” 52 JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 643–670, May 2009, doi: 10.1177/1077546308094247. [25] M. Kim, M. Hoegen, J. Dugundji, and B. L. Wardle, “Modeling and experimental verification of proof mass effects on vibration energy harvester performance,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 19, no. 4, 2010, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/4/045023. [26] L. Tang and J. Wang, “Size effect of tip mass on performance of cantilevered piezoelectric energy harvester with a dynamic magnifier,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 228, no. 11, pp. 3997–4015, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00707-017-1910-8. [27] R. Somkuwar, J. Chandwani, and R. Deshmukh, “Wideband auto-tunable vibration energy harvester using change in centre of gravity,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 3033–3044, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00542-018-3846-x. [28] S. P. Beeby, M. J. Tudor, and N. M. White, “Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/17/12/R01. [29] S. Saxena, R. Sharma, and B. D. Pant, “Design and development of guided four beam cantilever type MEMS based piezoelectric energy harvester,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1751–1759, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00542-016-2940-1. [30] S. Sunithamani and P. Lakshmi, “Experimental study and analysis of unimorph piezoelectric energy harvester with different substrate thickness and different proof mass shapes,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2421–2430, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00542-016-2917-0. [31] A. H. Alameh, M. Gratuze, M. Y. Elsayed, and F. Nabki, “Effects of proof mass geometry on piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 18, no. 5, May 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18051584. [32] Z. D. O. S. Wong Chin Chye, Electromagnetic Micro Power Generator - A Comprehensive Survey. . [33] P. S. Sathya, “Bimorph Piezoelectric Energy Harvester at Low Frequency,” Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.202. [34] M. Guizzetti, V. Ferrari, D. Marioli, and T. Zawada, “Thickness Optimization of a Piezoelectric Converter for Energy Harvesting.” [35] S. Priya et al., “A Review on Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting: Materials, Methods, and Circuits,” Energy Harvesting and Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–39, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1515/ehs-2016-0028. [36] Comsol, “Piezoelectric Energy Harvester.” [Online]. Available: www.comsol.com/trademarks. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1269
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Zahid Hossain, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering (MPE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.description.abstract In this thesis work a cantilever structure based bimorph piezoelectric energy harvester have been designed and analyzed using lead zirconium titanate (PZT 5A) as piezoelectric material and steel as the elastic substrate layer. This energy harvester has one of its end clamped to a vibrating source from where vibration is being induced into the cantilever beam and a proof mass is mounted on top of the other end. The energy harvester model is designed and finite element model (FEM) simulation is done in COMSOL Multiphysics for the conversion of mechanical vibrations to electrical energy. Different structural parameters, including piezoelectric layer thickness, proof mass volume and proof mass material has been changed to increase the output electrical energy while keeping the same resonant frequency. First the frequency response of the device is performed which shows that the resonant frequency occurs at 71 Hz at a peak output voltage of 5.16V for a mechanical input power of 1.25mW resulting in an electrical output power of 1.2mW. Then, with the increase of both the top and bottom piezoelectric layer thickness, it was found that the peak voltage decreases with the increase of resonant frequency. Again with the increase of proof mass volume, it was found that the peak voltage increases with the decrease of resonant frequency. Finally, by increasing both the piezo electric layer thickness 1.33 times of initial value 0.6 mm and proof mass volume 2 times of initial value 95.2mm3, voltage increases to 7.675V from initial value of 5.16V at a fixed resonant frequency of 71hz. Similar results are found at other data points by keeping increment ratio same. A load response analysis for different piezoelectric layer thicknesses was also done. At last after observing the simulation results for different proof mass materials and volume, it was found that it has negligible effect on performance if the mass remains same. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering (MPE),Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject Bimorph, Unimorph, Piezoelectric Energy Harvester, PZT 5A, Piezo Layer, Elastic Substrate Layer, Cantilever Beam, Structural Parameters, Proof Mass (PM), COMSOL Multiphysics. en_US
dc.title Analysis of Bimorph Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Attached With a Cantilever Beam Under Excitation en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics