| Login
dc.contributor.author | Shakeen, Tashfiqur Rahman | |
dc.contributor.author | Amin, Md. Latul Ibn | |
dc.contributor.author | Rohan, Fayaz | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-20T03:33:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-20T03:33:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aljanabi, Q., Chik, Z., Allawi, M., El-Shafie, A., Ahmed, A. and El-Shafie, A., 2017. Support vector regression-based model for prediction of behavior stone column parameters in soft clay under highway embankment. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(8), pp.2459-2469. Al-Kahdaar, R.M. and Al-Ameri, A.F.I., 2010. Correlations between physical and mechanical properties of Al-Ammarah soil in Messan Governorate. Journal of Engineering, 16(4), pp.5946-5957 Anonymous, 2016. Peer review report 1 on “Evaluation of a random displacement model for predicting particle escape from canopies using a simple eddy diffusivity model”. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 217, p.290. Austin, P., 2007. A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality. Statistics in Medicine, 26(15), pp.2937-2957. Breiman, L., 1991. Discussion: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. The Annals of Statistics, 19(1). Chauhan, N.K. and Singh, K., 2018, September. A review on conventional machine learning vs deep learning. In 2018 International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON) (pp. 347-352). IEEE. CVS, R. and Pardhasaradhi, N., 2018. Analysis of Artificial Neural-Network. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Volume-2(Issue-6), pp.418-428. Goh, A. and Goh, S., 2007. Support vector machines: Their use in geotechnical engineering as illustrated using seismic liquefaction data. Computers and Geotechnics, 34(5), pp.410-421. Grömping, U., 2009. Variable Importance Assessment in Regression: Linear Regression versus Random Forest. The American Statistician, 63(4), pp.308-319. Hamidi, O., Tapak, L., Abbasi, H. and Maryanaji, Z., 2017. Application of random forest time series, support vector regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines models in prediction of snowfall (a case study of Alvand in the middle Zagros, Iran). Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 134(3-4), pp.769-776. Khuri, A.I. and Conlon, M., 1981. Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics, 23(4), pp.363-375. 51 | P a g e Kirts, S., Nam, B., Panagopoulos, O. and Xanthopoulos, P., 2019. Settlement Prediction Using Support Vector Machine (SVM)-Based Compressibility Models: A Case Study. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(10), pp.1547-1557. Konyushkov, V., 2020. Comparing the results of numerical modeling of slope stability in the Plaxis program with analytical calculations using the simplified method. Вестник гражданских инженеров, 17(3), pp.108-115. Lindvall, M., Molin, J. and Löwgren, J., 2018. From machine learning to machine teaching. Interactions, 25(6), pp.52-57. Ma, G., Chao, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y. and Hu, H., 2018. The application of support vector machine in geotechnical engineering. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 189, p.022055. Madhyannapu, R.S., Puppala, A.J., Hossain, S., Han, J. and Porbaha, A., 2006. Analysis of geotextile reinforced embankment over deep mixed soil columns: using numerical and analytical tools. In GeoCongress 2006: geotechnical engineering in the information technology age (pp. 1-6). MAKOTO, K. and KHANG, T.T., Relationships between N value and parameters of ground strength in the South of Vietnam. Martens, B., 2018. The Importance of Data Access Regimes for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal,. Naeej, M., Naeej, M., Salehi, J. and Rahimi, R., 2016. Hydraulic conductivity prediction based on grain-size distribution using M5 model tree. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 12(2), pp.107-114. Pal, M. and Deswal, S., 2009. M5 model tree based modelling of reference evapotranspiration. Hydrological Processes, 23(10), pp.1437-1443. Pirnia, P., Duhaime, F. and Manashti, J., 2018. Machine learning algorithms for applications in geotechnical engineering. Geo Edmonton, pp.1-7. Ponomarev, A. and Sychkina, E., 2015. The application of research results anisotropic deformability sandstones for numerical modeling in PLAXIS. PNRPU Construction and Architecture Bulletin, (1), pp.21-36. Ramabodu, M. and Verster, J., 2013. Factors that influence cost overruns in South African public sector mega-projects. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 5(1/2), p.48. 52 | P a g e Shaha, N.R., 2013. Relationship between penetration resistance and strength compressibility characteristics of soil. Shahin, M.A., Jaksa, M.B. and Maier, H.R., 2001. Artificial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering. Australian geomechanics, 36(1), pp.49-62. Shooshpasha, I., Amiri, I. and MolaAbasi, H., 2015. AN INVESTIGATION OF FRICTION ANGLE CORRELATION WITH GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES FOR GRANULAR SOILS USING GMDH TYPE NEURAL NETWORKS (RESEARCH NOTE). Singh, B., Sihag, P. and Singh, K., 2017. Modeling of impact of water quality on infiltration rate of soil by random forest regression. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3(3), pp.999-1004. Solomatine, D. and Xue, Y., 2004. M5 Model Trees and Neural Networks: Application to Flood Forecasting in the Upper Reach of the Huai River in China. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9(6), pp.491-501. Teng, W., 1983. Foundation design. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall. Yan, Q., Guo, M. and Jiang, J., 2011. Study on the Support Vector Regression Model for Order's Prediction. Procedia Engineering, 15, pp.1471-1475. Yin, Z.Y., Jin, Y.F., Huang, H.W. and Shen, S.L., 2016. Evolutionary polynomial regression-based modelling of clay compressibility using an enhanced hybrid real-coded genetic algorithm. Engineering Geology, 210, pp.158-167. Zhang, H., 2014. A Random Forest Approach to Model-based Recommendation. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 11(15), pp.5341-5348. Zhang, W. and Goh, A., 2013. Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems. Computers and Geotechnics, 48, pp.82-95. Zou, K.H., Tuncali, K. and Silverman, S.G., 2003. Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology, 227(3), pp.617-628. Nakhforoosh, A., Nagel, K.A., Fiorani, F. and Bodner, G., 2021. Deep soil exploration vs. topsoil exploitation: distinctive rooting strategies between wheat landraces and wild relatives. Plant and soil, 459(1), pp.397-421. Kamal, M.A., Arshad, M.U., Khan, S.A. and Zaidi, B.A., 2016. Appraisal of geotechnical characteristics of soil for different zones of Faisalabad (Pakistan). Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 53 | P a g e Ngah, S.A. and Nwankwoala, H.O., 2013. Evaluation of sub-soil geotechnical properties for shallow foundation design in onne, Rivers state, Nigeria. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 2, pp.8-15. 54 | P a g e | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1351 | |
dc.description | Supervised by Mr. Istiakur Rahman, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering(CEE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The digital revolution is currently leaving no sector untouched. The combination of data and digital technologies opens up a multitude of opportunities in the geotechnical sector and Machine Learning is undeniably one of the most innovative applications in predicting soil parameters. Even so, owing to the uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the prediction models, traditional methods of determining soil parameters are still being used, which are both costly and time consuming. The purpose of this study is to correlate the different soil parameters of Bangladesh coastal soil, such as SPT N value, Shear wave velocity, Fine Content, Cohesion, and stiffness, and then use the correlation to predict the Angle of Friction. To predict the angle of friction of the coastal soil, six machine learning techniques were used: Simple linear regression model, Multi polynomial Regression, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, M5 Model Tree, and Artificial Neural Network. About 58 data sets were collected and used for this research project. Among 58 data sets, 48 were used to correlate the soil parameters and 10 data sets were used for testing and validation. Furthermore, all the machine learning methods were compared in terms of prediction accuracy. Finally, a validation of the predicted result has been conducted using PLAXIS 2D Software. In general, the Random Forest and M5 model tree regression models generated the best results, as the R2 value (97.95% & 95.23% respectively) is the highest among all of the models and the error-values are also lower, reflecting better accuracy. Moreover, it is more evident from the study that conventional machine learning technique shows better performance than ANN where there is data scarcity. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh | en_US |
dc.subject | Conventional machine learning, prediction of Soil parameter, Simple linear regression model, Multi polynomial Regression, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, M5 Model Tree, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), SPT N Value, Shear wave velocity, Fine Content, Cohesion, Stiffness, Angle of Friction, PLAXIS 2D, Embankment model. | en_US |
dc.title | Establishing the co-relations between different geotechnical parameters of Bangladesh coastal soil using machine learning techniques | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |