- IUT Repository Home
- →
- Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEE)
- →
- Thesis
- →
- Undergraduate
- →
- 2016
- →
- View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Hoque, A.K.M. Ashraful | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mahmud, Rafid Hasan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Noor, Rashed-Uz-Zaman | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-03T08:07:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-03T08:07:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-11-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission(www.baec.gov.bd) 2. Ministry of Power,Energy and Mineral resources ( mpemr.gov.bd) 3. Bangladesh Water and Power Development Board(www.bpdb.gov.bd) 4. International Atomic Energy Agency(/www.iaea.org ) 5. International Energy Agency(www.iea.org ) 6. British Petroleum (www.bp.com ) 7. Arthur, E. D., Paul T. Cunningham and Richard L. Wagner, Jr. (1998). An architecture for nuclear energy in the 21st century. Santa Fe NM: Santa Fe Energy Seminar. 8. Bisselle, C. A., and R. D. Brown (1984). Radionuclides in U.S. Coals. MTR-83W234, Mitre Corporation for U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-Ac01-80ET13800. Cited in Lehman (1996). 9. Bradley, J., Robert L. (1997). Renewable energy: not cheap, not "green", Cato Institute. Cato Policy Analysis 280 (www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-280.html). 10. Cohen, B. L. (1998a). Perspectives on the high level waste disposal problem. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 23(3): 193-203. 11. Cohen, B. L. (1998b). Validity of the linear no-threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis at low doses. Uranium Institute Twenty-Third Annual International Symposium (10-11 September), London. (www.uilondon.org/sym/1998/cohen.htm.) 12. Drennen, T. E., and Jon D. Erickson (1998). Who will fuel China? Science 279(6 March): 1483. 13. EIA (1997). International Energy Annual 1997 Overview. Department of Energy: (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/ ide/ overview.html). 14. Gabbard, A. (1993). Coal combustion: nuclear resource or danger? ORNL Review 26(3-4): 24-33. 15. Grossman, W.M. (1999). When publishing could mean perishing. Scientific American 281(3): 40. 16. Grbler, A., Nebojsa Nakicenovic and David G. Victor (1999). Dynamics of energy technology and global change. Energy Policy 27: 247-280. 17. IAEA (1997). Sustainable Development and Nuclear Power. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency. 18. IEA (1998). World Energy Outlook. Paris, OECD. 19. Kadak, A. C. (1999a). The comeback of gas reactors. Boston: American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting. 20. Kadak, A. C. (1999b). The American Nuclear Society's role in global climate change mitigation. Acapulco: International Joint Meeting "The Role of Nuclear Power to Mitigate Climate Change". 21. King, J. K., Ed. (1979). International Political Effects of the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. Washington, D.C., USGPO. 22. Lehman, L. L. (1996). Nuclear Fear: The Environmental Cost. Prior Lake MN, Technical & Regulatory Evaluations Group, Inc. 23. MacDougall, R. D. (1999). US nuclear power - can competition give it renewed life? Nuclear Engineering International(June): 34-37. 24. Magwood, W. D., IV (1999). Looking toward generation four: considerations for a new nuclear R&D agenda. American Nuclear Society 1999 Summer Meeting. 86 25. Marchetti, C. (1987). Fig. 7(a). Historical evolution of the primary energy mix for the world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 32(4). 26. NEA (1998). Nuclear Power and Climate Change. Paris, OECD. 27. NEI (1998). Bullish on nuclears economics, AmerGen to buy Three Mile Island. Nuclear Energy Insight (August). Washington, D.C.: Nuclear Energy Institute. 28. NEI (1999). Meeting Our Clean Air Needs With Emission-Free Generation. Washington, Nuclear Energy Institute. 29. Rossin, A. D. (n.d.). Looking at the U.S. nuclear industry. 30. Royal Society and Royal Academy (1999). Nuclear energy--the future climate. (www.royalsoc.ac.uk/st_pol55.htm) 31. Suzuki, A. (1993). The plutonium issue and the environmental problem. Proc. International Conference on Nuclear Waste Management and Environmental Remediation, Vol. 2. Prague, Czech Republic, September 5-11. Cited in Lehman (1996), p. 138. 32. Swaine, D. J. (1990). Trace Elements in Coal. London, Butterworth. 33. USGS (1997). Radioactive elements in coal and fly ash: abundance, forms, and environmental significance, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-163-97. 34. Weingart, J. M. (1978). The Helios strategy: an heretical view of the potential role of solar energy in the future of a small planet. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 12: 273-315. 35. Wilson, R., and John Spengler, Eds. (1996). Particles in Our Air: Concentrations and Health Effects. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press. 36. Wolfe, B. (1996). Why environmentalists should promote nuclear energy. Issues in Science and Technology, pp. 55-60. Summer. 37. http://energy.mit.edu/news/why-we-still-need-nuclear-power/ 38. Nuclear Energy: Statistics, Dr. Elizabeth Ervin 39. Jump up^ "An oasis filled with grey water". NEI Magazine. 2013-06-25. 40. Jump up^ Topical issues of infrastructure development IAEA 2012 41. Jump up^ "2014 Key World Energy Statistics" (PDF). International Energy Agency. 2014. p. 24. Archived from the original on 2014-05-05. 42. Jump up^ "Nuclear Energy". Energy Education is an interactive curriculum supplement for secondary-school science students, funded by the U. S. Department of Energy and the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). U. S. Department of Energy and the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). July 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-10. 43. Jump up^ "Collectively, life cycle assessment literature shows that nuclear power is similar to other renewable and much lower than fossil fuel in total life cycle GHG emissions.''". Nrel.gov. 2013-01-24. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 44. Jump up^ Life Cycle Assessment Harmonization Results and Findings.Figure 1 45. ^ Jump up to:a b "IPCC Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex II I: Technology - specific cost and performance parameters" (PDF). IPCC. 2014. p. 10. Retrieved 2014-08-01. 46. ^ Jump up to:a b "IPCC Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex II Metrics and Methodology. pg 37 to 40,41" (PDF). 47. Jump up^ "Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power - global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas 87 (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning". Pubs.acs.org. Bibcode:2013EnST...47.4889K. doi:10.1021/es3051197. 48. Jump up^ Union-Tribune Editorial Board (2011-03-27). "The nuclear controversy". Union-Tribune. San Diego. 49. ^ Jump up to:a b James J. MacKenzie. Review of The Nuclear Power Controversy by Arthur W. Murphy The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Dec., 1977), pp. 467-468. 50. In February 2010 the nuclear power debate played out on the pages of The New York Times, see A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power and Revisiting Nuclear Power: A Debate and A Comeback for Nuclear Power? 51. U.S. Energy Legislation May Be 'Renaissance' for Nuclear Power. 52. Share. "Nuclear Waste Pools in North Carolina". Projectcensored.org. Retrieved 2010-08-24. 53. "Nuclear Power". Nc Warn. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 54. Sturgis, Sue. "Investigation: Revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety". Southernstudies.org. Retrieved 2010-08-24. 55. iPad iPhone Android TIME TV Populist The Page (2009-03-25). "The Worst Nuclear Disasters". Time.com. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 56. Strengthening the Safety of Radiation Sources p. 14. 57. Johnston, Robert (2007-09-23). "Deadliest radiation accidents and other events causing radiation casualties". Database of Radiological Incidents and Related Events. 58. Markandya, A.; Wilkinson, P. (2007). "Electricity generation and health". Lancet. 370(9591): 979–990. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61253-7. PMID 17876910. - Nuclear power has lower electricity related health risks than Coal, Oil, & gas. ...the health burdens are appreciably smaller for generation from natural gas, and lower still for nuclear power.This study includes the latent or indirect fatalities, for example those caused by the inhalation of fossil fuel created particulate matter, smog induced Cardiopulmonary events, black lung etc. in its comparison.) 59. Gohlke JM et al. Environmental Health Perspectives (2008). "Health, Economy, and Environment: Sustainable Energy Choices for a Nation". Environmental Health Perspectives. 116 (6): A236–A237. doi:10.1289/ehp.11602. PMC 2430245 . PMID 18560493. 60. "Dr. MacKay Sustainable Energy without the hot air". Data from studies by the Paul Scherrer Institute including non EU data. p. 168. Retrieved 2012-09-15. 61. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/ with Chernobyl's total predicted linear no-threshold cancer deaths included, nuclear power is safer when compared to many alternative energy sources' immediate, death rate. 62. ^ Jump up to:a b Brendan Nicholson (2006-06-05). "Nuclear power 'cheaper, safer' than coal and gas". Melbourne: The Age. Retrieved 2008-01-18. 63. ^ Jump up to:a b c Burgherr, P.; Hirschberg, S. (2008). "A Comparative Analysis of Accident Risks in Fossil, Hydro, and Nuclear Energy Chains" (PDF). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: an International Journal. 14 (5): 947. doi:10.1080/10807030802387556.Page 962 to 965. Comparing Nuclear's latent cancer deaths, such as cancer with other energy sources immediate deaths per unit of energy generated(GWeyr). This study does not include Fossil fuel related cancer and other indirect deaths created by the use of fossil fuel consumption in its "severe accident", an accident with more than 5 fatalities, classification. 64. International Atomic Energy Agency (2015-08-31). "The Fukushima Daiichi Accident: Report from the Director General". p. 13. 88 65. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/02/20/national/post-quake-illnesses-kill-more-in-fukushima-than-2011-disaster#.VxRuJHBVvSF 66. "Ten New Nuclear Power Reactors Connected to Grid in 2015, Highest Number Since 1990". Retrieved May 22, 2016. 67. "China Nuclear Power | Chinese Nuclear Energy - World Nuclear Association". www.world-nuclear.org. 68. Blau, Max (2016-10-20). "First new US nuclear reactor in 20 years goes live". CNN.com. Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Retrieved 2016-10-20. 69. "Moonshine". Atomicarchive.com. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 70. "The Atomic Solar System". Atomicarchive.com. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 71. taneya says:. "What do you mean by Induced Radioactivity?". Thebigger.com. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 72. "Neptunium". Vanderkrogt.net. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 73. "Otto Hahn, The Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1944". Nobelprize.org. Retrieved 2007-11-01. 74. "Otto Hahn, Fritz Strassmann, and Lise Meitner". Chemical Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 2016-10-27. 75. "Otto Robert Frisch". Nuclearfiles.org. Retrieved 2007-11-01. 76. "The Einstein Letter". Atomicarchive.com. Retrieved 2013-06-22. 77. Benjamin K. Sovacool, The National Politics of Nuclear Power, Routledge, p. 68. 78. Bain, Alastair S.; et al. (1997). Canada enters the nuclear age: a technical history of Atomic Energy of Canada. Magill-Queen's University Press. p. ix. ISBN 0-7735-1601-8. 79. "Reactors Designed by Argonne National Laboratory: Fast Reactor Technology". U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory. 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-25. 80. "Reactor Makes Electricity." Popular Mechanics, March 1952, p. 105. 81. "STR (Submarine Thermal Reactor) in "Reactors Designed by Argonne National Laboratory: Light Water Reactor Technology Development"". U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory. 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-25. 82. "From Obninsk Beyond: Nuclear Power Conference Looks to Future". International Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved 2006-06-27. 83. "Nuclear Power in Russia". World Nuclear Association. Retrieved 2006-06-27. 84. "This Day in Quotes: SEPTEMBER 16 - Too cheap to meter: the great nuclear quote debate". This day in quotes. 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-16. 85. Pfau, Richard (1984) No Sacrifice Too Great: The Life of Lewis L. Strauss University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, p. 187, ISBN 978-0-8139-1038-3 86. David Bodansky (2004). Nuclear Energy: Principles, Practices, and Prospects. Springer. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-387-20778-0. Retrieved 2008-01-31. 87. Kragh, Helge (1999). Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 286. ISBN 0-691-09552-3. 88. "On This Day: October 17". BBC News. 1956-10-17. Retrieved 2006-11-09. 89. "50 Years of Nuclear Energy" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved 2006-11-09. 90. McKeown, William (2003). Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident. Toronto: ECW Press. ISBN 978-1-55022-562-4. 91. The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry p. 110. 92. Jump up^ Bernard L. Cohen (1990). The Nuclear Energy Option: An Alternative for the 90s. New York: Plenum Press. ISBN 978-0-306-43567-6. 89 93. Evolution of Electricity Generation by Fuel PDF (39.4 KB) 94. Sharon Beder, 'The Japanese Situation', English version of conclusion of Sharon Beder, "Power Play: The Fight to Control the World's Electricity", Soshisha, Japan, 2006. 95. Paula Garb. Review of Critical Masses, Journal of Political Ecology, Vol 6, 1999. 96. b Rüdig, Wolfgang, ed. (1990). Anti-nuclear Movements: A World Survey of Opposition to Nuclear Energy. Detroit, MI: Longman Current Affairs. p. 1. ISBN 0-8103-9000-0. 97. Brian Martin. Opposing nuclear power: past and present, Social Alternatives, Vol. 26, No. 2, Second Quarter 2007, pp. 43-47. 98. Stephen Mills and Roger Williams (1986). Public Acceptance of New TechnologiesRoutledge, pp. 375-376. 99. Robert Gottlieb (2005). Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement, Revised Edition, Island Press, USA, p. 237. 100. Jump up^ Falk, Jim (1982). Global Fission: The Battle Over Nuclear Power. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. pp. 95–96. ISBN 978-0-19-554315-5. 101. Walker, J. Samuel (2004). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 10-11. 102. Herbert P. Kitschelt (1986). "Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 16 (1): 57. doi:10.1017/s000712340000380x. 103. Herbert P. Kitschelt (1986). "Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 16 (1): 71. 104. Social Protest and Policy Change p. 45. 105. "The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy in the United States" (PDF). Social Policy. The Brookings Institution. 2004. Retrieved 2006-11-09. 106. Nuclear Power: Outlook for New U.S. Reactors p. 3. 107. "Nuclear Follies". Forbes magazine. 1985-02-11. 108. "Backgrounder on Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident". Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 2006-06-28. 109. Jump up^ "RBMK Reactors | reactor bolshoy moshchnosty kanalny | Positive void coefficient". World-nuclear.org. 2009-09-07. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 110. "Italy rejoins the nuclear family". World Nuclear News. 2009-07-10. Retrieved 2009-07-17. 111. "Italy puts one year moratorium on nuclear". 2011-03-13. 112. "Italy nuclear: Berlusconi accepts referendum blow". BBC News. 2011-06-14. 113. "Olkiluoto pipe welding 'deficient', says regulator". World Nuclear News. 2009-10-16. Retrieved 2010-06-08. 114. Kinnunen, Terhi (2010-07-01). "Finnish parliament agrees plans for two reactors". Reuters. Retrieved 2010-07-02. 115. "Olkiluoto 3 delayed beyond 2014". World Nuclear News. 2012-07-17. Retrieved 2012-07-24. 116. "Finland's Olkiluoto 3 nuclear plant delayed again". BBC. 2012-07-16. Retrieved 2012-08-10. 117. "Trend in Electricity Supplied". Retrieved 2015-10-29. 118. "The Nuclear Renaissance". World Nuclear Association. Retrieved 2014-01-24. 119. ^ WNA (2013-06-20). "Nuclear power down in 2012". World Nuclear News. 90 120. http://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-power-in-the-world-today.aspx 121. Sylvia Westall & Fredrik Dahl (2011-06-24). "IAEA Head Sees Wide Support for Stricter Nuclear Plant Safety". Scientific American.[dead link] 122. "Gauging the pressure". The Economist. 2011-04-28. 123. European Environment Agency (2013-01-23). "Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation: Full Report". p. 476. 124. "Turkey Prepares to Host First ATMEA 1 Nuclear Reactors". PowerMag. Electric Power. Retrieved 2015-05-24. 125. "Startup of Sendai Nuclear Power Unit No.1". Kyushu Electric Power Company Inc. 2015-08-11. 126. Nuclear Renaissance Threatened as Japan’s Reactor Struggles Bloomberg, published March 2011, accessed 2011-03-14 127. Analysis: Nuclear renaissance could fizzle after Japan quake Reuters, published 2011-03-14, accessed 2011-03-14 128. Japan nuclear woes cast shadow over U.S. energy policy Reuters, published 2011-03-13, accessed 2011-03-14 129. Nuclear winter? Quake casts new shadow on reactors MarketWatch, published 2011-03-14, accessed 2011-03-14 130. Will China's nuclear nerves fuel a boom in green energy? Channel 4, published 2011-03-17, accessed 2011-03-17 131. "Italy announces nuclear moratorium". World Nuclear News. 2011-03-24. Retrieved 2011-05-23. 132. Jo Chandler (2011-03-19). "Is this the end of the nuclear revival?". The Sydney Morning Herald. 133. Aubrey Belford (2011-03-17). "Indonesia to Continue Plans for Nuclear Power". The New York Times. 134. Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu: Japan situation has "caused me to reconsider" nuclear power Piers Morgan on CNN, published 2011-03-17, accessed 2011-03-17 135. Israeli PM cancels plan to build nuclear plant xinhuanet.com, published 2011-03-18, accessed 2011-03-17 136. "IAEA sees slow nuclear growth post Japan". UPI. 2011-09-23. 137. http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/news/2015/january/taking-a-fresh-look-at-the-future-of-nuclear-power.html | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/137 | |
| dc.description | Supervised by Kazi Obaidul Awal Assistant Professor (Part time), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | IUT, EEE | en_US |
| dc.title | Nuclear Power Need & Key Issues: | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Bangladesh Perspective | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
2016 [24]