Comparative study of undergraduate level electrical and electronic engineering curricula of selected university in OIC countries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Adamou, Nadoukou Idris
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-22T04:54:09Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-22T04:54:09Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03-15
dc.identifier.citation Al-Hazimi, A., Zaini, R., Al-Hyiani, A., Hassan, N., Gunaid, A., Ponnamperuma, G., Karunathilake, I., Roff, S., McAleer, S., & Davis, M. (2004). Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: A study in four undergraduate medical schools. Education for Health, 17(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280410001711003 Brown, G. T. L. (2019). Is Assessment for Learning Really Assessment? Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00064 Brüsow, S. M., & Wilkinson, A. C. (2007). Generative Learning and Assessment Strategies: An Investigation into Concept-Mapping. Assesment Design for Learner Responsibility, 1–12. Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G., & Joordens, M. (n.d.). Accreditation Inspired Project Oriented Design Based Learning Curriculum for Engineering Education. Commission, E., & European Commission. (2015). ECTS users’ guide - European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the …, 2(August), 1–60. http://ec.europa.eu/education/ects/users-guide/key-features_en.htm#ectsTop%0Ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:ECTS+Users+?+Guide#0 Court, S., & Henderson, X. (2014). Undergraduate Student. CURRICULUM AND SOCIETY: A SUBJECT ADVISORS’ PERSPECTIVE by MAGDELINE OFENTSE MARGARET MAHUPELA A mini-dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER EDUCATION’S in CURRICULUM STUDIES in the FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND NURSING at the RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY. (n.d.). Curriculum for B . Tech in Electrical Engineering. (n.d.). 1, 4. Educating the Engineer of 2020. (2005). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11338 Faculty, T. E. (2016). Kocaeli university (pp. 1–35). In, R. (2013). ( C Ivil E Ngineering M Aterials ). April, 2012–2013. Kanter, A. S., Negin, J., Olayo, B., Bukachi, F., Johnson, E., & Sachs, S. E. (2009). Millennium Global Village-Net: Bringing together Millennium Villages throughout sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(12), 802–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.002 KE, M. (2016). No Title مقياس مقترح لتقييم جودة. ججج جججججججج جججج ججججججج ججججججج ججججج ججججج جججج: , 147(March), 11–40. King fahd University. (n.d.). LYNN MCALPINE AND CYNTHIA WESTON REFLECTION: ISSUES RELATED TO IMPROVING PROFESSORS’ TEACHING AND STUDENTS’ LEARNING. (2002). Marzooghi, R. (2016). Curriculum Typology. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(7), 166. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n7p166 Mccaw, W. P. (n.d.). EDLD 552.01: The Supervision and Evaluation of Public School Educators. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi/1505 Memon, Q. A. (2007). On analysis of electrical engineering programme in GCC countries. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433269 Mulenga, I. M. (n.d.). Conceptualization and Definition of a Curriculum. In Journal of Lexicography and Terminology (Vol. 2, Issue 2). Normore, A. H., & Doscher, S. P. (2007). Using media as the basis for a social issues approach to promoting moral literacy in university teaching. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710762445 Pierson, C. (n.d.). Reflections on Educational Metaphors for Teaching English as a Second Language to Adult Learners. Sari, M., & Doğanay, A. (2009). Hidden Curriculum on Gaining the Value of Respect for Human Dignity: A Qualitative Study in Two Elementary Schools in Adana (Vol. 9, Issue 2). Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In Educational Technology (Vol. 35). Say, G., Ve, S., Gazete, R., Konservatuvar, D., Madde, K., Gazete, R., Konservatuvar, D., Madde, D., Gazete, R., Kredi, A., Sistemini, T., & Gazete, R. (2011). Yönetmelikler. Stage, I. (2009). Chapter 6 : Curriculum Design. In Design (Issue 1984, pp. 31–34). Vitae, C. (2013). Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka. 1–7. Zubizarreta, J., & Development, F. (2006). The Learning Portfolio: Reflective Practice for Improving Student Learning. Teaching Theology and Religion, 9(1), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2006.00261_1.x en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1390
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Faruque A.Haolader, Department of Technical and Vocational Education and Training(TVET), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.description.abstract Curriculum in education, is the outline of concepts to be taught to students to help them meet the content standards. Curriculum is what is taught in a given course or subject and it refers to an interactive system of instruction with specific goals, contents, strategies, measurement, and resources. On the other hand, Assessment in education ascertains the extent of achievement of a program learning objectives by the students and the effectiveness of the delivery approaches and processes used by teachers in educational institutions. The assurances of quality assessment in engineering universities can result in the production of highly competent graduates for the labor market. The OIC member countries are facing major challenges in Engineering professional registration standardization as a whole and in the field of Electrical & Electronic Engineering as a whole due to the significant differences in the undergraduate curricula in these countries. This paper compared undergraduate Electrical & Electronic Engineering curricula in five countries members of the OIC i.e. Osun States University of Nigeria, King Fahd University of Egypt, Kocaeli University of Turkey, University Teknikal Malaysia Melaka of Malaysia and Qatar University of Qatar. A review of the course requirements, course credits and course hours of these universities were presented and eventually compared. The research grouped the courses into three different categories: general courses, core courses and electives courses. Some similarities were noted among all five universities. The main similarity is the teaching of modern language such as English. Secondly, five core course subjects are taught in the five universities. These subjects are electrical, electronic, Control Eng. (System), Electromagnetics and the end of year project of study. Regarding the assessment systems of the universities, although each university has its own specificity, some similarities between King Fahd University and Qatar University which both have the same system for evaluating students was observed. Therefore, based on these outcomes, engineering universities are recommended to improve the existing programs of the OIC member states universities in order to better promote and reinforce cooperation and exchange programs in between different universities. OIC Engineering universities are equally recommended to consider the perceptions of their students and teachers and put more emphasis on the practice of quality and authentic evaluation practices and better train teachers in the use of appropriate teaching and assessment techniques. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT) en_US
dc.title Comparative study of undergraduate level electrical and electronic engineering curricula of selected university in OIC countries en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics