Improved Classification of Ultrasound Breast Cancer RF Data with Nakagami and Derived Nakagami Parameters Using Advanced Machine Learning Algorithm

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shafiullah, Ahmad
dc.contributor.author Chowdhury, Ahmad
dc.contributor.author Rosen, Rezwana
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-22T05:57:09Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-22T05:57:09Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03-30
dc.identifier.citation [1] American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019-2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2019. [2] Cancer today, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/ [3] J.Mamou, Michael L. Oelze,W.D. O’Brien, et al.,"Perspective on Biomedical Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging,"Applications Corner, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 112-116, May 2006. [4] D’Astous FT and Foster FS, “Frequency Dependance of Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter in Breast Tissue,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 12, issue 10, pp. 795-808, 1986. [5] Nam K, Zagzebski JA and Hall TJ, “Quantitative Assessment of In Vivo Breast Masses Using Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 35, issue 2, pp. 146–161, April 2013. [6] Michael L.Oelze,"Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques and Improvements to Diagnostic Ultrasonic Imaging," in IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, Dresden,Germany, 2012, pp.232-239. [7] Lizzi F.L., Astor M., Liu T., Deng C., Coleman D.J. and Silverman R.H., “Ultrasonic Spectrum Analysis for Tissue Assays and Therapy Evaluation,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 3-10, 1997. [8] Lizzi F.L., Astor M., Feleppa E.J., Shao M. and Kalisz A., “Statistical Framework for Ultrasonic Spectral Parameter Imaging,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 23, issue 9, pp. 1371-1382, 1997. [9] Alam S.K., Feleppa E.J., Rondeau M., Kalisz A. and Garra B.S., “Ultrasonic Multi-Feature Analysis Procedure for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Solid Breast Lesions,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 17-38, 2011. [10] "Potential of Ultrasound Nakagami Imaging in Clinical Tissue Characterization," sJournal of Medical Ultrasound,Elsevier, pp. 51-53, 2013. Available: swww.sciencedirect.com [11] P. M. Shankar,"A general statistical model for ultrasonic scattering from stissues," IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency sControl, vol. 47, issue 3, pp. 727-736, May 2000. [12] P. M.Shankar, V. A. Dumane, John M. Reid, Vladimir Genis, Flemming sForsberg,Catherine W. Piccoli, Barry B. Goldberg, “Classification of Ultrasonic B-sMode Images of Breast Masses Using Nakagami Distribution,” IEEE Transactions on sUltrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 48, issue 2, March 2001. [13] P. M.Shankar, “A Compounding Scattering Pdf for the Ultrasonic Echo Envelope sand its Relationship to K and Nakagami Distributions,” IEEE Transactions on sUltrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 50, issue 3, pp. 339-343, sMarch 2003. [14] P. M.Shankar, “The Use of the Compounding Probability Density Function in ssUltrasonic Tissue Characterization,” Physics in Medicine and Biology ,vol. 49, issue ss6, pp. 1007-1015, April 2004 84 [15] Karmeshu, Agrawal R., “Study of Ultrasonic Echo Envelope Based on Nakagami-ssInverse Gaussian Distribution,’’Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology , vol. 32 issue ss3, spp.371-376, March 2006. [16] Agrawal R., Karmeshu,“Ultrasonic Backscattering in Tissue:Characterization ssThrough Nakagami-Generalized Inverse Gaussian Distribution,” Computers in ssBiology sand Medicine,Elsevier, vol.37, issue 2, pp.166-172, Feb 2007. [17] Bouhlel N., Sevestre-Ghalila S., “Nakagami Markov random field as Texture Model ssfor Ultrasound RF Envelope Model,” Computers in Biology and Medicine,Elsevier, ssvol.39, issue 6, pp. 535-544, June 2009. [18] P. M. Shankar, V. A. Dumane, John M. Reid, Vladimir Genis, Flemming sForsberg,Catherine W. Piccoli, Barry B. Goldberg,“Classification of Breast Masses sin sUltrasonic B-Mode Images Using a Compounding Technique in the Nakagami sDistribution Domain,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 28, issue 10, pp. s1295–1300, Oct 2002. [19] P.M. Shankar, V. A. Dumane1, Thomas George,Catherine W Piccoli, John M. ssReid,Flemming Forsberg,Barry B Goldberg, “Classification of Breast Masses in ssUltrasonic B Scans Using Nakagami and K Distributions”, Physics in Medicine and ssBiology, vol. 48, issue 14, pp. 2229–2240, Jul 2003. [20] Po-Hsiang Tsui, Chih-Chung Huang, Shyh-Hau Wang, “Use of Nakagami ssDistribution and Logarithmic Compression in Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization,” ssJournal of Medical and Biological Engineering, vol.26, issue 2, pp.69-73, June ss2006. [21] Po-Hsiang Tsui,Chien-Cheng Chang , “Imaging Local Scatterer Concentrations by the Nakagami Statistical Model,’’Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 33, issue 4, pp. 608–619, Apr 2007. [22] Po-Hsiang Tsui ,Chih-Kuang Yeh,Chien-Cheng Chang and Wen-Shiang Chen, s“Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Nakagami Image in Tissue Characterization,’’ dUltrasonic Imaging, vol. 30, issue 2, Apr 2008. [23] Po-Hsiang Tsui , Chih-Kuang Yeh, Yin-Yin Liao , “Ultrasonic Nakagami Imaging: A dStrategy To Visualize The Scatterer Properties of Benign and Malignant Breast dTumors,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, issue. 2, pp. 209–217, Feb d2010. [24] Aymeric Larrue, J. Alison Noble, “Modeling of Errors in Nakagami Imaging: dIllustration on Breast Mass Characterization,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, dvol. 40, no. 5, pp. 917–930, May 2014. [25] Dutt V & Greenleaf JF, “Ultrasound Echo Envelope Analysis Using a Homodyned K dDistribution Signal Model,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 16, issue 4, pp. 265-287, Oct d1994. [26] Hruska, David P (2009), “Improved Techniques for Statistical Analysis of the dEnvelope of Backscattered Ultrasound Using the Homodyned K Distribution,” dUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. [27] Hruska D.P. and Oelze M.L., “Improved Parameter Estimates Based on the dHomodyned K Distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and dFrequency Control, vol. 56, issue 11, pp. 2471-2481, Nov 2009. [28] Trop I., Destrempes F., Khoury M.E., Robidoux A., Gaboury L., Allard L., Chayer B. sand Cloutier G., “The Added Value of Statistical Modelling of Backscatter sProperties sin the Management of Breast Lesion at US,” Radiology, vol. 275, issue 3, sJune 2015. 85 [29] H.D. Cheng, JuanShan, WenJu, YanhuiGuo, LingZhang , “Automated Breast Cancer sDetection and Classification using Ultrasound Images: A Survey, ” Pattern sRecognition,Elsevier, vol. 43, issue 1 pp. 299-317, Jan 2010. [30] F.Destrempes and G.Cloutier , “A Critical Review and Uniformized Representation dof Statistical Distributions Modeling the Ultrasound Echo Envelope,” Ultrasound in dMedicine and Biology, vol. 36, issue 7, pp. 1037–1051, Jul 2010. [31] P.Sprawls. Ultrasound Production and Interactions. dAvailbale:http://www.sprawls.org/ppmi2/USPRO/#THE%20ULTRASOUND%20IMdAGING%20SYSTEM [32] Anon. Available: dhttps://www.google.com/search?q=logistic+regression&hl=en&sxsrf=ALeKk03uCh5dauWYVxzznGNVfcG1CNLsbQA:1615536878282&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=Xdd&ved=2ahUKEwiA_4Dup6rvAhVh4nMBHeceC4kQ_AUoAXoECBgQAw&biw=18d9d7&bih=909 [33] Anon. The Ultimate Guide to Decision Trees for Machine Learning. Available: dhttps://www.keboola.com/blog/decision-trees-machine-learning [34] A.Navlani. Decision Tree Classification in Python. Available: dhttps://www.datacamp.com/community/tutorials/decision-tree-classification-python [35] Anon. Available: dhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwadtch%3Fv%3DgoPiwckWE9M&psig=AOvVaw1EjsFD94j3UPTuDaGn9Prd&ust=161d5387887307000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCPiz8Py6o-d8CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD [36] A.Navlani. Understanding Random Forests Classifiers in Python. Available: dhttps://www.datacamp.com/community/tutorials/random-forests-classifier-python [37] M.Deshpande.(2020, Sept.29). Python Machine learning, Zenva. Available: dhttps://pythonmachinelearning.pro/perceptrons-the-first-neural-networks/ [38] T.Vasiloudis.(2019, Aug.26). Block-distributed Gradient Boosted Trees. dAvailable: http://tvas.me/articles/2019/08/26/Block-Distributed-Gradient-Boosted-dTrees.html [39] Anon. Gradient Boosting, AI Wiki. Available: https://docs.paperspace.com/machine-dlearning/wiki/gradient-boosting [40] Anon. Available: dhttps://www.google.com/search?q=support+vector+machine&sxsrf=ALeKk02F5b8RdSW4pqIoR_gMGkxZYKTDNEQ:1615301800492&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&dved=2ahUKEwjSnpeQvKPvAhUIlEsFHWBGDIQQ_AUoAnoECBUQBA&biw=189d7&bih=909 [41] A.Navlani. Support Vector Machines with Scikit-learn. Available: dhttps://www.datacamp.com/community/tutorials/svm-classification-scikit-learn-dpython [42] American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-dRADS) Atlas (American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2003). [43] Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al., ACR BI-RADS® Ultrasound, In: dACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Reston, VA, dAmerican College of Radiology, 2013 [44] J. Weston, A. Elisseeff, B. Scholkopf, and M. Tipping, “Use of the zero-norm with dlinear models and kernel methods,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, special dIssue on variable and Feature Selection 3, pp.1439-1461, 200 86 [45] Xue-wen Chen, Jong Cheol Jeong, “Enhanced Recursive Feature Elimination”, Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, DOI: 10.1109/ICMLA.2007.35 [46] X. Chen, “Margin based wrapper methods for gene identification using microarray,” dNeurocomputing, vol. 69(16-18): 2236-2243, 2006. [47] J. Weston, A. Elisseeff, B. Scholkopf, and M. Tipping, “Use of the zero-norm with dlinear models and kernel methods,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, special dIssue on variable and Feature Selection 3, pp.1439-1461, 2003 [48] M. Ashraf, G. Chetty, and D. Tran, “Feature selection techniques on dthyroid,hepatitis, and breast cancer datasets,” International Journal on Data Mining dand Intelligent Information Technology Applications(IJMIA),vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-8, d2013. [49] M. Leach, “Parallelising feature selection algorithms,” University of Manchester, dManchester, 2012. [50] Pinar Yildirim, “Filter Based Feature Selection Methods for Prediction of Risks in dHepatitis Disease”, International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, Vol. d5, No. 4, August 2015 [51] Mouhamadou Lamine Samb, Fodé Camara, Samba Ndiaye, Yahya Slimani and dMohamed Amir Esseghir, “A Novel RFE-SVM-based Feature Selection Approach dfor Classification”, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 43, June, 2012 [52] I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Barnhill, and V. Vapnik, “Gene selection for cancer dclassification using support vector machines,” Machining Learning, vol. 46, no. 1-3, dpp. 389-422, 2002. [53] Naeem Seliya, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Jason Van Hulse, “A Study on the dRelationships of Classifier Performance Metrics”, 2009 21st IEEE International dConference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence [54] N. Japkowicz. Classifier evaluation: A need for better education and restructuring. In dProceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning, dICML 2008, Helsinki, Finland, 2008. [55] M. Sokolova, N. Japkowicz, and S. Szpakowicz. Beyond accuracy, f-score and roc: A dfamily of discriminant measures for performance evaluation. In In the Australian dConference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1015–1021, 2006. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1392
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Ruhul Amin, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering(EEE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704. Bangladesh en_US
dc.description.abstract Ultrasound imaging is one of the medical imaging modalities that has become popular among the researchers for breast cancer diagnosis because of its radiation free and non-invasive nature compared to other screening procedures like X-ray Mammography, CT-scan etc. In ultrasound studies, various quantitative analysis has been shown to be capable of breast cancer diagnosis. This research utilizes the statistical parameters from the well-known Nakagami distribution and investigates their potential in improvement of noninvasive semi-automated identification of breast cancer. The dataset used in the study has 130 biopsy-proven patients consisting of 104 benign and 26 malignant cases with traced lesion boundaries. In this study, seven types of Nakagami and derived Nakagami images have been generated for each patient from the basic and derived parameters of Nakagami distribution. To determine the suitable window size for image generation, an empirical analysis has been conducted using three window sizes of width 0.2 mm and lengths 0.1875 mm, 0.45 mm and 0.75mm. The images were analyzed quantitatively for feature extraction, followed by feature selection using the machine learning algorithm- Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross Validation. A combination of six features was found for window size 0.75mm which gives a classification accuracy of 92.3% and area under the ROC curve score of 0.95 using Linear Support Vector Machine classifier. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.title Improved Classification of Ultrasound Breast Cancer RF Data with Nakagami and Derived Nakagami Parameters Using Advanced Machine Learning Algorithm en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics