Polytechnic Students’ Perceived Satisfaction of Using Technology in the Learning Process

Sadam, Nsangou Youmo Souleman

IUT Repository Home
→
Technical and Vocational Education (TVE)
→
Thesis
→
Graduate
→
2021
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Sadam, Nsangou Youmo Souleman
dc.date.accessioned	2022-04-22T08:28:36Z
dc.date.available	2022-04-22T08:28:36Z
dc.date.issued	2021-03-30
dc.identifier.citation	Abdullah-Al-Mamun, M. (2015). Technology in Educational Settings in the Government Polytechnic Institutes Technology in Educational Settings in the Government Polytechnic Institutes of Bangladesh : A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), (September 2012). https://doi.org/10.5120/8628-2502 Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students ’ Perceived Ease of Use ( PEOU ) and Perceived Usefulness ( PU ) of e-portfolios 1 Introduction. 1–47. Al-azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). The Effect of Universal Design for Learning ( UDL ) Application on E-learning Acceptance : A Structural Equation Model. 18(6). Amanortsu, G., & Dzandu, M. D. (2013). Towards the Access to and Usage of Information and Communication Technology ( ICT ) in Polytechnic Education. 66(1), 23–33. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (2004). INTRODUCTION. In Terry Anderson & Fathi Elloumi (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (online_boo, pp. xiii–xxiii). Retrieved from cde.athabascau.ca/online_book Athabasca Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). System , scholar or students ? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness ? 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12048 Arenas, E. (2015). Affordances of learning technologies in higher education multicultural environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 217–227. Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x Artino, A. R. (2009). Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9 Astin, A. (1993). what matters in college? Retrieved from http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=9409260313 Bandura. (1986). Social fundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Nueva Jersey. Nueva Jersey: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.bd/books?hl=en&lr=&id=PdY9o3l5vpYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA94&dq=Bandu ra,+A.+(1986).+Social+foundations+of+thought+and+action:+A+social+cognitive+theory.+Englew ood+Cliffs,+NJ:+Prentice+Hall&ots=uFjWwW3l7P&sig=sBYiS6WQ_OaMgzZbC1dka4tLfeM&re dir Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000 Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory : An agentic. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21–41. Bandura, A. (2000). Control of Human Behavior, Mental Processes, and Consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer - Google Books. In (2000b). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In A. W. J. E. G. Perrig (Ed.), Control of human behavior, mental processes and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 17-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.bd/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GjQik3MhmnMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA16&dq=Ban dura,+A.+(2000b).+Self- efficacy:+The+foundation+of+agency.+In+A.+W.+J.+E.+G.+Perrig+(Ed.),+Control+of+human+be 82 havior,+mental+processes+and+consciousness:+Essays+in+honor+of+t Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–26. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=4369846&site=ehos t-live Beas, M. I., & Salanova, M. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs , computer training and psychological well-being among information and communication technology workers. 22, 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.027 Bernhardt, V. L. (1991). Assesing perceptions. Using education for the future questionnaires. Education for the Future, 1–14. Binyamin, S. S., Rutter, M. J., & Smith, S. (2020). The moderating effect of gender and age on the students’ acceptance of learning management systems in Saudi higher education. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 12(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.003 Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2012). Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. 33(1), 81–98. Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. (June 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949 Bolliger, M. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in online learning. (March), 61– 67. Bradford, G. R. (2011). Internet and Higher Education A relationship study of student satisfaction with learning online and cognitive load : Initial results. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 217– 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.001 Breckler, S. J. (1990). Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.260 Burke, J. (1985). The Impact of Science on Society. Burkhardt, M. E. (1994). Social Interaction Effects Following a Technological Change: A Longitudinal Investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 869–898. https://doi.org/10.5465/256603 Chiang, I.-C. A., Jhangiani, R. S., & Price, P. C. (2015, October 13). Reliability and Validity of Measurement. BCcampus. Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: the role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963 Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4 Coast, C. (2015). Improving Teaching and Learning in Polytechnics with ICT Improving teaching and learning in Polytechnics with ICT. (August). Conrad, A. M. (2008). RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY , TECHNOLOGY , ATTITUDES AND ANXIETY : DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY USE SCALE ( CTUS ). 39(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.1.d Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305319 Dickson, P. P., Pendidikan, F., Malysia, U. K., Pendidikan, F., Perguruan, U., & Idris, S. (2010). THE EFFECTS OF INTEGRATING MOBILE AND CAD TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHING DESIGN PROCESS FOR MALAYSIAN POLYTECHNIC. 9(4), 162–172. Divjak, M., Rupel, V. P., & Lešnik, K. M. (2018). The impact of study attitudes and study behaviour on satisfaction of online students with the implementation of online study programmes. Educational Media International, 55(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1512450 83 Ekwunife-orakwue, K. C. V, & Teng, T. (2014). Computers & Education The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.011 Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). The Acceptance of E-learning as a Tool for Teaching and Learning in Libyan Higher. (April 2015). Entwlstle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment Introduction to the Special Issue. (1987), 201–204. Estriegana, R., Medina-merodio, J., & Barchino, R. (2019). Computers & Education Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work : An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 135(August 2018), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010 Farrell, T., & Rushby, N. (2016). Assessment and learning technologies: An overview. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12348 Frey, B. B. (2018). Internal Consistency. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation, 50–53. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n340 Ga, D., Loughin, T. M., Kovanovi, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Computers & Education Learning at distance : Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. 87, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.002 Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Internet and Higher Education Mobile computing devices in higher education : Student perspectives on learning with cellphones , smartphones & social media. 19, 2007–2009. Giovanis, A. N., Binioris, S., & Polychronopoulos, G. (2012). An extension of TAM model with IDT and security/privacy risk in the adoption of internet banking services in Greece. EuroMed Journal of Business, 7(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/14502191211225365 Glover, I., Hepplestone, S., Parkin, H. J., Rodger, H., & Irwin, B. (2016). Pedagogy first: Realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12425 Goldstein, H., Bonnet, G., & Rocher, T. (2007). Multilevel structural equation models for the analysis of comparative data on educational performance. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(3), 252–286. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998606298042 Gregory, A. (1999). Technology Is The Tool , Teaching Is The Task : Student Satisfaction In Distance Learning. 1–9. Habiba, U., & Md. Maidul Islam. (2015). Using Pattern of Internet and E-resources by the Students and Faculty Members of a Private University in Bangladesh. (December). https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-5-1 Hanover Research. (2017). 2017 Digital Study Trends Survey Results Prepared for McGraw-Hill Education by Hanover Research. (October), 1–31. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/ecommerce-prod.mheducation.com/unitas/highered/explore/sites/study- trends/2017-digital-trends-survey-results.pdf Hao, Y.-W. (2004). Students’ Attitudes toward Interaction in Online Learning: Exploring the Relationship between Attitudes, Learning Styles, and Course Satisfaction. Lib.Utexas.Edu, 1–136. Retrieved from http://www.lib.utexas.edu/etd/d/2004/haoy96662/haoy96662.pdf Hodges. (2008). Self-Efficacy in the Context of Online Learning Environments A Review of the Literature and Directions for Research. International Society for Performance Improvement, 20(3- 4/2008), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq Holmberg. (1983). Guided didactic conversation in distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmber (Eds.),. 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.c3l.uni- oldenburg.de/cde/support/readings/holm83.pdf Hong, K. (2002). Relationships between students ’ and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. 5, 267–281. Horvat, A., Dobrota, M., & Krsmanovic, M. (2015). Student perception of Moodle learning management system : a satisfaction and significance analysis. (May 2015), 37–41. 84 https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788033 Hossien Zare, S. Y. (2013). The causal Model of effective factors on Intention to use of information technology among payam noor and Traditional universities students. 66, הנוטע עלון (1997), 39– 37. Retrieved from http://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1002/008_B00896life1002_46_50.pdf I, I. M., & Arif, C. R. A. (2013). Relationship between the Acceptance of Mobile Learning for AutoCAD Course and Learning Style in Polytechnic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee 2012), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.731 İbrahim Hakki Bulut, & IN. (2019). CONSTRUCTION OF AN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ENGAGEMENT MODEL FOR SOCIAL LEARNING PLATFORMS (Vol. 34). Middle East Technical University. Ifinedo, P. (2017). Examining students’ intention to continue using blogs for learning: Perspectives from technology acceptance, motivational, and social-cognitive frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.049 Islam, M. A., Abdul Rahim, A., Tan, C. L., & Momtaz, H. (2011). Effect of demographic factors on e- learning effectiveness in a higher learning institution in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n1p112 Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research Methods and Statistics A Critical Thinking Approach. Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How Do Online Course Design Features Influence Student Performance ? AC. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014 Jeong, S. W., & Park, J.-S. (2020). Impacts of technology anxiety and perceived productivity on attitude toward self-service technology. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 28(4), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2020.28.4.480 Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467–483. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers and Education, 62, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.027 Joon Lee, S., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Internet and Higher Education Examining the relationship among student perception of support , course satisfaction , and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001 Ju, Y., Yon, K., & Kyung, E. (2011). Computers & Education Online university students ’ satisfaction and persistence : Examining perceived level of presence , usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008 Karvounidis, T., Chimos, K., Bersimis, S., & Douligeris, C. (2014). Evaluating Web 2.0 technologies in higher education using students’ perceptions and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(6), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12069 Ke, F. (2013). CONSTRUCTS OF STUDENT-CENTERED ONLINE LEARNING ON LEARNING SATISFACTION OF A DIVERSE ONLINE STUDENT BODY : A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH. 48(1), 97–122. Keller, john M. (1983). Instructional-design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status - Google Books. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from https://books.google.com.bd/books?hl=en&lr=&id=N_MVUyHxnkcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA383&dq=Ke ller,+J.+M.+(1983).+Motivational+design+of+instruction.+In+C.+M.+Reigeluth+(Ed.),+Instruction al+design+theories+and+models:+An+overview+of+their+current+status+(Vol.+1,+pp.+3 Keller, john M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach - John M. Keller - Google Books. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from https://books.google.com.bd/books?hl=en&lr=&id=HRCQlZzMwhsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Kelle r,+J.+M.+(2010).+Motivational+design+for+learning+and+performance:+The+ARCS+model+appr oach.+New+York,+NY:+Springer.&ots=RaKPTX327I&sig=jygoRZYaUcMGyfTn2LPTUN5J0MY 85 &redir_esc= Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904345 Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020 GLOBAL DIGITAL OVERVIEW. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-brazil Kennewell, S. (2006). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning Using Affordances and Constraints to Evaluate. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200105 Kenny, & Baron, A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512353 Kline. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), Thought (third edit, Vol. 20). https://doi.org/10.5840/thought194520147 Korableva, O., Durand, T., Kalimullina, O., & Stepanova, I. (2019). Studying user satisfaction with the MOOC platform interfaces using the example of coursera and open education platforms. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322134.3322139 Kumar, S., & Daniel, B. K. (2016). Integration of learning technologies into teaching within Fijian Polytechnic Institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0036-8 Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001 L. Smart, K., & J. Cappel, J. (2006). Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5, 201–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/243 Lane, M. (2014). UNIVERSITY STAFF ADOPTION OF IPADS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY USING AN EXTENDED TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL. 18(3), 53–74. Lee, Jung-Wan Kim, Y.-E. (2009). Perceived Interaction in Online Classes and Technology Acceptance Model to Student Satisfaction. Journal of Distribution Science, 7(3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.7.3.200909.25 Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2012). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses _1306 1..10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01306.x Liaw, S. (2008). Investigating students ’ perceived satisfaction , behavioral intention , and effectiveness of e-learning : A case study of the Blackboard system. 51, 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005 Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2013). Computers & Education Perceived satisfaction , perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015 Lin, Y. M., Lin, G. Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.1.a Malinowsky, C., Kottorp, A., Tanemura, R., Asaba, E., Nagao, T., Noda, K., … Nyga, L. (2015). ScienceDirect Validation of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire in a Japanese context. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.002 Mends-brew, E. (2012). ENHACEMENT OF ICT IN POLYTECHNICS FOR ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT. 3(3), 99–107. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial : Three types of interaction Editorial : Three Types of Interaction. 3647(October). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659 Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103(October 2018), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008 Muilenburg, L. Y., Berge, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2007). Student barriers to online 86 learning : Afactoranalyticstudy Student Barriersto Online Learning : A. 7919. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269 Olanrewaju, O. S., & Ikuereye, E. P. (2019). M-Learning in Developing Countries : Challenges , Remedies and Benefits in Instructional Activities. 4(1), 105–114. Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology- Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294 Parai, M., Shenoy, P., & Loh, K. Y. (2015). Students ’ perception of technology-assisted learning in undergraduate medical education – A survey. The Social Science Journal, 52(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.08.007 Park, S. Y. (2014). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students ’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. Peart, D. J., Rumbold, P. L. S., Keane, K. M., & Allin, L. (2017). Student use and perception of technology enhanced learning in a mass lecture knowledge-rich domain first year undergraduate module. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0078-6 Perry R.Hinto, Isabella McMurray, C. B. (2014). SPSS Explained second edition. In Sereal Untuk (Vol. 51). Prensky, M. (2009). H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital... Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3). Rabin, E., Henderikx, M., Kalman, Y. M., & Kalz, M. (2020). What are the barriers to learners’ satisfaction in MOOCs and what predicts them? The role of age, intention, self-regulation, self- efficacy and motivation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.5919 Rainer, R. K., & Miller, M. D. (1996). An assessment of the psychometric properties of the computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747- 5632(95)00021-6 Rivers, J. K., & Rivers, P. A. (2015). Africa and Technology in Higher Education : Trends , Challenges , and Promise. International Journal for Innovation, 3(5), 14–31. Retrieved from http://ijier.net/index.php/ijier/article/view/354 Rocci Luppicini. (2005). International Forum of Educational Technology & Society A Systems Definition of Educational Technology in Society Author ( s ): Rocci Luppicini Published by : International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Linked references are available on JSTOR. 8(3), 103– 109. Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., & Avgerinou, M. D. (2013). Internet and Higher Education The effects of technology on the Community of Inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.006 S.A. Onasanya, R.A. Shehu, R. O. O. and L. A. S. (2010). higher institution’s lectures’ attitude towards integration of ICT into teaching and research in nigeria. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjit.2010.1.10 Santos, H., Batista, J., & Marques, R. P. (2019). Digital transformation in higher education: The use of communication technologies by students. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.163 Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00051-5 Shahadat Khan, Mahbub, H., & C Clement. (2012). Barriers To the Introduction of Ict Into Education in Developing Countries: the Example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 61– 80. Shelley, M. C. (2008). Considering Students ’ Perceptions : The Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model Considering Students ’ Perceptions : The Distance Education Student. Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone Ownership Update. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life 87 Project., 3–12. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology, 13(1982), 290. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723 Sthle, L., & Wold, S. (1990). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 9(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(90)80094-M Strachota, E. M. (2003). Student satisfaction in online courses: An analysis of the impact of learner- content, learner-instructor, learner-learner and learner-technology interaction. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of WisconsinMilwaukee, Dissertati(64(08)), 2746. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.050 Šumak, B., Hericko, M., Pušnik, M., & Polančič, G. (2011). Factors affecting university students’ use of moodle: An empirical study based on TAM. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017010102 Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., & Chen, Y. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning ? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. 50, 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 UNESCO, I. de statistique de. (2015). TECHNOLOGIES DE L ’ IN FORMATION ET DE LA COMMUNICATION ( TIC ) EN EDUCATION EN AFRIQUE SUBSAHARIENNE Analyse comparative du développement numérique dans les écoles. Venkatesh, V. . M. D. D. (2003). (2006). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, Second Edition - 3 Volume Set, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780849375477.ch230 Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Studies Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies. 46(2), 186–204. Villanti, A. C., Johnson, A. L., Ilakkuvan, V., Jacobs, M. A., Graham, A. L., & Rath, J. M. (2017). Social media use and access to digital technology in US Young Adults in 2016. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e196. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7303 Xu, F., & Du, J. T. (2018). Factors influencing users’ satisfaction and loyalty to digital libraries in Chinese universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.029 Xue, H., Sharma, P., & Wild, F. (2019). User Satisfaction in Augmented Reality-Based Training Using Microsoft HoloLens. Computers, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers8010009 Yalcin, Y. (2017). Florida State University Libraries Online Learners ’ Satisfaction : Investigating the Structural Relationships among Self- Regulation , Self-Efficacy , Task Value ,. Yi-Cheng CHEN et al. (2013). Examining Factors Affecting College Students’ Intention to Use Web- Based Instruction Systems: Towards an Integrated Model - University of Huddersfield. Retrieved November 30, 2020, from TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational technology 12.2 website: https://hud.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/openurl?institution=44HUD_INST&vid=44HUD_IN ST:Services&%3Fctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi%2Fenc:UTF- 8&rfr_id=info:sid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi%2Ffmt:kev:mtx:journal &rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining Factors Affecting College Students%27 Intention to Use Web-Based Instruction Systems: Towards an Integrated Model&rft.jtitle=TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational technology&rft.au=Yi-Cheng CHEN&rft.au=Yi-Chien LIN&rft.au=Ron Chuen YEH&rft.au=Shi-Jer LOU&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.eissn=1303- 6521&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.externalDocID=3031410981&paramdict=en-US Yuen, A. H. K., Cheng, M., & Chan, F. H. F. (2019a). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 88 2520–2535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12830 Yuen, A. H. K., Cheng, M., & Chan, F. H. F. (2019b). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2520–2535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12830 Zhang, Y., & Lin, C. H. (2020). Student interaction and the role of the teacher in a state virtual high school: what predicts online learning satisfaction? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 57– 71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1694061 Zhu, Y., Hua, J., Wing, Z., & Greg, A. (2020). University students ’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses : a self ‑ regulated learning perspective. In Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09753-w	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1396
dc.description	Supervised by Dr. Abdulalh Al Mamun,, Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur 1704, Dhaka.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Over the decade, technology has undoubtedly entered all areas of human affairs. Specifically, it becomes ubiquitous in the education system. Its integration into tertiary education has contributed significantly to the improvement of teaching and learning experience. However, despite significant progress in the integration and optimal use of these tools by tertiary education stakeholders, there are still grey areas that requires further calibration and understanding to get the maximum benefit of the technology. One such area is the polytechnic students’ perceived satisfaction of using technology in their study. This study proposes a structural model that explains polytechnic students’ perceived satisfaction and investigates the relationships among the factors that affect polytechnic students’ perceived satisfaction in the use of technology in their learning process. Moreover, the influence of some demographics data (gender, age, district, level of the academic year, living place, study time using technology and type of internet connection) on the factors that affect students’ perceived satisfaction require to be scrutinized carefully. Therefore, this study attempts to address this gap by designing a quantitative survey research method in the context of Polytechnique institutes of Bangladesh. An online survey was conducted and a total of 847 polytechnic students from 16 polytechnic institutes in Bangladesh effectively participated in this study. Data collected from the students were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and independent multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results revealed that social interaction, attitude and self-efficacy have a significant impact on perceived satisfaction; social interaction has a positive effect on attitude; attitude has a positive effect on self- efficacy; perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and anxiety have non significant effect on attitude. Furthermore, the study finds that gender, living place, study time and type of internet connection have a significant effect on both social interaction and polytechnic students’ perceived satisfaction of using technology in their learning, while attitude and self-efficacy are influenced only by study time and type of internet connection. Finally, implications for theory and practice are discussed, limitations are highlighted, and the future research directions are suggested	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT)	en_US
dc.subject	Technology in learning, Polytechnic students, Perceived satisfaction, Technology acceptance model (TAM), Structural equation model, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.title	Polytechnic Students’ Perceived Satisfaction of Using Technology in the Learning Process	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US