| Login
dc.contributor.author | Al Suraimi, Aqel Surama Mohammed | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-22T08:43:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-22T08:43:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL Students' Perceptions of Blended Learning Environment: Advantages, Limitations, and Suggestions for Improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95-110. Arkhipova, M. V., Belova, E. E., Gavrikova, Y. A., Lyulyaeva, N. A., & Shapiro, E. D. (2017). Blended learning in teaching EFL to different age groups. Paper presented at the International Conference on Humans as an Object of Study by Modern Science. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18. Bukhari, S. S. F., & Basaffar, F. M. (2019). EFL Learners’ Perception about Integrating Blended Learning in ELT. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (5). 190-205. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.14 Chen, W.-F. (2012). An Investigation of Varied Types of Blended Learning Environments on Student Achievement: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(3). Curtis J. Bonk, C. R. G. (2005). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. Dikmenli, Y., & Unaldi, U. E. (2013). Effect of the Blended Learning Environment and the Application of Virtual Class upon the Achievement and the Attitude against the Geography Course. Online Submission, 3(2), 43-56. Elaine Allen, J. S., and Richard Garrett. (2007). Blending In. In Blending In The Extent and Promise of Blended Education (pp. 29): United States of America. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, 3-21. Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, First Edition (pp. 253-259): IGI Global. Hamad, M. M. (2015). Blended Learning Outcome vs. Traditional Learning Outcome. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 75-78. Heinze, A., & Procter, C. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. Hoic-Bozic, N. (2009). A blended learning approach to course design and implementation IEEE transactions on education 19-30. Picciano, A. G. (2006). BLENDED LEARNING: IMPLICATIONS FOR GROWTH AND ACCESS. Journal of Asynchronous, 8. Sagarra, N., & Zapata, G. C. (2008). Blending classroom instruction with online homework: A study of student perceptions of computer-assisted L2 learning. ReCALL, 20(2), 208-224. Saltan, F. (2017). Blended learning experience of students participating pedagogical formation program: Advantages and limitation of blended education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 63-73. Su, J.-M., Tseng, S.-S., Lin, H.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2011). A personalized learning content adaptation mechanism to meet diverse user needs in mobile learning environments. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 21(1-2), 5-49. Waha, B., & Davis, K. (2014). University students’ perspective on blended learning. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 172-182. Wichadee, S. (2017). A development of the blended learning model using Edmodo for maximizing students’ oral proficiency and motivation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(02), 137-154. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-20. learning, I. (2018, September 12). 5 Benefits of Blended Learning. Retrieved from Imagine learning: https://www.imaginelearning.com/blog/2018/09/5-benefits-blended-learning | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1397 | |
dc.description | Supervised by Dr. Mahbub Hasan, Assistant Professor, Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) Islamic University of Technology (IUT) Gazipur, Bangladesh | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims at investigating university students’ perceptions about the integration of Blended Learning (BL) in theory courses at the Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Bangladesh. To explore students' perceptions of BL as a teaching-learning platform, a mixedmethod research approach was adopted through the construction of a structured questionnaire including open-ended questions. A total of 226 students from different departments of IUT participated in this study. An electronic survey was conducted that includes three subsections: a) to improve learners’ interaction, b) to increase their interests, and c) to provide autonomous learning. Besides online surveys, printed questionnaires were also distributed to the students who resided in the halls of residence (male and female). Based on the data collected, the descriptive frequencies and thematic analysis were conducted to study students’ perceptions of integrating Blended Learning. The results indicate an overall positive attitude towards integrating BL in university courses. It is recommended that there is an increase for integrating BL at the university level curriculum to stimulate the process of teaching and learning. This study also provides valuable insight into the academic process participants to harvest benefits of the technology, collaboration, boosting motivation, and encouraging personalized approach in university teaching and learning. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT) | en_US |
dc.title | Learners’ Perspectives on Integrating Blended Learning: A Case of Islamic University of Technology (IUT) | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |