Engineering University Teachers’ Conceptions of ICT Enhanced Teaching: Bangladesh Perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khalid, Mboka
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-29T17:19:23Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-29T17:19:23Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03-30
dc.identifier.citation Abdul Latif, G., & Lajiman, J. (2011). A study of student‘s perception of teaching and learning in instructional design and technology faculty of languages and communication. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(15), 80–86. Åkerlind *, G. S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216679 Åkerlind, G. (2005). Phenomenographic methods: a case illustration. Doing Developmental Phenomenography, 103–127. Åkerlind, G., & Bowden, J. (2005). Learning to do Phenomenography : A reflective discussion. 74– 100. Åkerlind, G. S. (2005a). Higher Education Research & Development Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672 Åkerlind, G. S. (2005b). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672 Alsop, G., & Tompsett, C. (2006). Making sense of ‗pure‘ phenomenography in information and communication technology in education. Alt-J, 14(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760600837058 Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the ‗world‘ of phenomenography? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383980420407 Award-Winning University Teachers ’ Concepts of Teaching Author ( s ): M . J . Dunkin and R . P . Precians Published by : Springer Stable URL : http://www.jstor.com/stable/3447583 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : refe. (1992). 24(4), 483–502. Bailey, J. (2008). First steps in qualitative data analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice, 25(2), 127– 131. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn003 Bain, J., McNaught, C., Mills, C., & Lueckenhausen, G. (1998). Describing Computer-facilitated Learning Environments in Higher Education. Learning Environments Research, 1(2), 163– 180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009905832421 Bangladesh education statistics 1. (2018). Bansal, D. (2016). BENEFITS OF ICT IN EDUCATION Challenges of ICT enabled Education at school and home. Issue II, 5(Ii), 1–8. Baş, G., & Baştuğ, M. (2020). Teaching-learning conceptions, teaching motivation, and perceptions towards ICT: A research in Turkish public high schools. Education and Information 68 Technologies, Prensky 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10324-y Bauer, S. C., & Brazer, S. D. (2013). The Impact of Isolation on the Job Satisfaction of New Principals. Journal of School Leadership, 23(1), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461302300106 Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105 Biggs, J., & Tang, C. S. K. (2011). Train-the-Trainers: Implementing Outcomes-based Teaching and Learning in Malaysian Higher Education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.8.2011.7624 Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. (n.d.). Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Brown, K. L. (2003). Teachervsstudentindiverseclasss (pp. 49–54). Collier-Reed, B. I., Ingerman, Å., & Berglund, A. (2009). Reflections on trustworthiness in phenomenographic research: Recognising purpose, context and change in the process of research. Education as Change, 13(2), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823200903234901 Cope, C. (2004). Ensuring Validity and Reliability in Phenomenographic Research Using the Analytical Framework of a Structure of Awareness. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(2), 5. Corazon, M., Castro, S. A., Impact, M. C. S. A. T., Technology, C., Maria, P., & Saturnina, C. (2019). Tamansiswa International Journal in Education and Sciences ( TIJES ) The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Pedagogy : Benefits , Issues , and Challenges To cite this article : The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on P. 1, 28– 35. Cropley, D. H. (2015). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000008 Dahlgren, L. O. W. E. (1976). On non-verbatim learning. 49–55. Degago, A. T., & Kaino, L. M. (2015). Towards student-centred conceptions of teaching: the case of four Ethiopian universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020779 Dowling-Guyer, S., Johnson, M. E., Fisher, D. G., Needle, R., Watters, J., Andersen, M., Williams, M., Kotranski, L., Booth, R., Rhodes, F., Weatherby, N., Estrada, A. L., Fleming, D., Deren, S., & Tortu, S. (1994). Reliability of drug users‘ self-reported hiv risk behaviors and validity of self-reported recent drug use. Assessment, 1(4), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119400100407 Dr. Y. Rajasekhar, D. Y. R. (2012). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Higher Education. International Journal of Scientific Research, 3(3), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/march2014/28 Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use 69 ICT innovatively? Computers and Education, 51(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001 Dyer, H. T. (2020). Mediated Identities in the Futures of Place: Emerging Practices and Spatial Cultures. January. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06237-8 Ed, M. A. I. H. M., Ed, P. G. D., Ag, B. S., Dip, A., & Sci, A. (2010). TAFE-Horticulture teachers ’ conceptions of curriculum changes in Queensland , 1990-2003 A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in the Faculty of Education , Queensland University of Technology . SILVIN. November, 1990–2003. Ertmer. P.A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 4(47), 47–61. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen‘s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers and Education, 64(March 2018), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008 Eynon, R. (2005). The use of the internet in higher education: Academics‘ experiences of using ICTs for teaching and learning. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57(2), 168– 180. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530510589137 Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers and Education, 157(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969 Fomunyam, K. G. (2019). ICT Possibilities for primary and secondary education in Africa. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 10(12), 29–36. Gonzalez, C. (2009). Conceptions of, and approaches to, teaching online: A study of lecturers teaching postgraduate distance courses. Higher Education, 57(3), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9145-1 González, C. (2009). Teaching in ―blended‖ learning environments: How are conceptions of teaching and eteaching associated? ASCILITE 2009 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 346–353. González, C. (2010). Studies in Higher Education What do university teachers think eLearning is good for in their teaching ? July 2011, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902874632 Gow, L., & Kernbet-, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. 20–33. Harati, H., Blocher, J. M., Armfield, S. W., & Tu, C. H. (2019). Technology integration in a modified flipped spiraling curriculum: Reversing roles and rationale. Handbook of Research on Fostering Student Engagement With Instructional Technology in Higher Education, December, 388–410. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0119-1.ch021 Hazel, E., Conrad, L., & Martin, E. (1997). Exploring gender and phenomenography. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160208 70 Hodgson, V., & Shah, U. (2017). A phenomenographic study of lecturers‘ conceptions of using learning technology in a Pakistani context. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1154074 Hongboontri, C., & Keawkhong, N. (2014). School culture: Teachers‘ beliefs, behaviors, and instructional practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n5.7 Ingole, S. B. (2020). Role of ict in qualityteachingimprovement. 05, 256–262. Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Khaleel, M., Khalid, J., Al Mamun, M. A., Bhuiyan, M. Y. A., & Fouji, M. H. (2018). From ICT adoption to ICT addiction: The mediating factors between the use of ICT and learning performance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 9(2), 133– 159. https://doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.1561 Jacobvitz, D., Curran, M., & Moller, N. (2002). Measurement of adult attachment: The place of self-report and interview methodologies. Attachment and Human Development, 4(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730210154225 Js, P. (1994). Phenomenography Conference. Kain, D. J. (2003). Teacher-Centered versus Student-Centered: Balancing Constraint and Theory in the Composition Classroom. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 3(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-3-1- 104 Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177–228. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002177 Kaur, H. (2012). Do We Really Need Computers in Classroom Instructions. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 2(3), 64–66. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v2i3a.2673 Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics‘ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 4752(96)00028-X Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943877 Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers‘ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569608656 Khan, M. S. H., & Markauskaite, L. (2017). Approaches to ICT-enhanced teaching in technical and vocational education: a phenomenographic perspective. Higher Education, 73(5), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9990-2 Khan, S. H. (2014a). Phenomenography: a Qualitative Research Methodology in Bangladesh. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(2), 34–43. 71 Khan, S. H. (2014b). Vocational teachers‘ conceptions of, and approaches to, ICT in professional education. Vocational Teachers’ Conceptions of, and Approaches to, ICT in Professional Education. Khan, S. H. (2014c). Vocational teachers‘ conceptions of, and approaches to, ICT in professional education. Vocational Teachers’ Conceptions of, and Approaches to, ICT in Professional Education. https://manchester.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1794116445?a ccountid=12253%0Ahttp://manfe.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/44MAN/44MAN_services_page?url_ver=Z39.88- 2004&rft_val_fmt=dissertation&genre=unknown&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3A Khan, S. H. (2015). Emerging conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching: Australian TAFE context. Instructional Science, 43(6), 683–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9356-7 Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.773419 Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ―enhanced‖ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404 Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? the development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV Landgrebe, D., Thyrre, M., Landgrebe Thomsen, D., Thyrre Sørensen, M., & Ryberg, T. (2016). Aalborg Universitet Where have all the students gone? They are all on Facebook Now Where have all the students gone? They are all on Facebook Now. 94–102. Larsson, J., & Holmström, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 2(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601068105 Lawlis, G. F., Selby, D., Hinnant, D., & McCoy, C. E. (1985). Reduction of postoperative pain parameters by presurgicai relaxation instructions for spinal pain patients. Spine, 10(7), 649– 651. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198509000-00010 Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Vargas, V. R., & Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309 Limberg, L. (2000). Phenomenography: A relational approach to research on information needs, seeking and use. New Review of Information Behaviour Research VO - 1, 1(l), 51–67. Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers‘ 72 engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9 Marton, Saljo1976 On Qualitative Differences in Learning-1.pdf. (n.d.). MARTON, F., & SÄLJÖ, R. (1976). on Qualitative Differences in Learning: I-Outcome and Process*. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49. Marton, Ference. (1981a). Phenomenography - describing worldaroundus conceptio. 10, 177–200. Marton, Ference. (1981b). Phenomenography — Descr. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26373/ Marton, Ference. (1981c). Studying Conceptions of Reality — A Metatheoretical Note. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 25(4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383810250401 Marton, Ference. (1986). Phenomenography: A Research Approach to Investigating Different Understandings of Reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/42589189 Marton, Ference. (1992). Phenomenography and ―the art of teaching all things to all men.‖ International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839920050305 Marton, Ference. (2004). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods, 21(3), 141– 161. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203645994-17 Marton, Ference, & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284706 Mcmanus, J. (2009). Research Design Options : Phenomenography (.ppt). Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education Edited by. (n.d.). Miller, J. W., Martineau, L. P., & Clark, R. C. (2000). Technology infusion and higher education: Changing teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 24(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ihie.0000047412.64840.1c Ministry of Education, G. O. B. (2010). Education Policy 2010. 73 Mirete, A. B., Maquilón, J. J., Mirete, L., & Rodríguez, R. A. (2020). Digital competence and university teachers‘ conceptions about teaching. A structural causal model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124842 Moffitt, P. (2020). Engineering academics and technology enhanced learning; A phenomenographic approach to establish conceptions of scholarly interactions with theory. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.3aaef24b Munyengabe, S., Mukamusoni, D., Harindintwari, J., & Ndeze, J. C. (2019). Information communication technology as catalyst for pedagogical changes to generate a smart manpower requirement in developing countries. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109041 Nahar, S., Hasan, K. B. M. R., Limited, A. B., Chowdhury, T. S., Khan, S., & Zayed, N. M. (2020). Business Students ’ Attitude Towards Internet Usage : a Strategic Analysis on the Students of University of Rajshahi ,. 19(1), 1–6. Njoki, M. M., Wabwoba, F., & Micheni, E. M. (2016). ICT Definition Implication on ICT Career Choice and Exclusion among Women. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 8(5), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2016.05.07 Philosophy, L. (2015). Use of ICT in Libraries : An Empirical Study of Selected Libraries in Bangladesh Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice ( ejournal ) University of Nebraska Lincoln Use of ICT in Libraries : An Empirical Study of Selec. August 2007. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137 Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers‘ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008 Priyowidodo, G. (n.d.). Millennial Generation Conception about Islamophobic , De- radicalization and Communication Process Based on Multicultural Education : A Phenomenography Study. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01224.x Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics‘ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90024-8 Pulkkinen, J. (2007). Cultural globalization and integration of ICT in education. In Oulu Finland: University of Oulu. Qualitative Differences in Approaches to Teaching First Year University Science Author ( s ): Keith Trigwell , Michael Prosser and Philip Taylor Published by : Springer Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/3448286. (2016). 27(1), 75–84. 74 Queensland University of Technology. (1994). Phenomenography: Philosophy and Practice. In Phenomenography: Philosophy and Practice. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/53908/1/53908.pdf#page=345 Rahman, T., Nakata, S., Nagashima, Y., Rahman, M., Sharma, U., & Rahman, M. A. (2019). Bangladesh Tertiary Education Sector Review. Bangladesh Tertiary Education Sector Review. https://doi.org/10.1596/31526 Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438- 020-00155-y Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students‘ approaches to learning and teachers‘ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344720 Roberts, G. (2003). Teaching using the Web: Conceptions and approaches from a phenomenographic perspective. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022547619474 Rotar, O. (n.d.). Reflective phenomenography : elaborating on the reflective practice framework for phenomenographic data analysis. Salberg, J., Bäckström, J., Röing, M., & Öster, C. (2019). Ways of understanding nursing in psychiatric inpatient care – A phenomenographic study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1826–1834. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12882 Samueeowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics‘ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004130031247 Sandbergh, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160207 Saxena, N. (2017). The Role and Impact of ICT in Improving the Quality of Education: An Overview. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology The, 6(3), 501–503. Science, I. (1981). PHENOMENOGRAPHY — DESCRIBING CONCEPTIONS OF THE WORLD AROUND US Author ( s ): FERENCE MARTON Published by : Springer Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/23368358 . Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of U. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. Silviyanti, T. M., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). EFL teachers‘ perceptions on using ICT in their teaching: To use or to reject? Teaching English with Technology, 15(4), 29–43. Sin, S. (2010). Considerations of Quality in Phenomenographic Research. 305–319. Sjöström, B., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Applying phenomenography in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02375.x 75 Stolz, S. A. (2020). Phenomenology and phenomenography in educational research: A critique. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(10), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1724088 Technology, C. (2006). A survey of Internet access in a large public university in Bangladesh M . Roknuzzaman. Journal of Education, 2(3), 86–105. that some people are better at learning than others? which in its turn led to the second question: 2. (1994). 8, 4424–4429. Tight, M. (2016). Phenomenography: the development and application of an innovative research design in higher education research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1010284 Timsal, A., Hodgson, V., & Shah, U. (2018). of using Learning Technology in Pakistan Existing Literature on Students ’ Experience and Networked Learning. 2013, 104–112. Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—Predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035 Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing Approaches to Teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381211 Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160210 Tsai, P. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Preservice teachers‘ conceptions of teaching using mobile devices and the quality of technology integration in lesson plans. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12613 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1445
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan, Department of Technical and Vocational Education, Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.description.abstract This is a qualitative study on the rising concerns of using Information and Communication Technology [ICT] in higher education. The purpose of this study was to investigate views, practices and attitudes that define varying conceptions of engineering university teachers’ use of ICT in their teaching. A cohort of 14 teachers was selected from two universities in Bangladesh to participate in a semi-structured interview. Phenomenography research design was used to analyze data. The findings revealed five qualitatively different categories of description such as: imparting information, transmitting structured knowledge, offering guided learning, engaging students toward practice and engaging students toward innovation. Relationships among the categories of description revealed four dimensions of variation such as: purpose of using ICT in engineering teaching, role of teacher, role of student and TPACK components. The study further found that, ICT-use underpins teacher’s pedagogical approach to teaching engineering subjects and therefore provides useful information for university policy makers, teachers and curriculum designers toward quality teaching and learning outcomes. A quantitative investigation to determine impact of pedagogical approaches to teaching underpinned by ICT-use in engineering education is recommended. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Departmental of Technical and Vocational Education(TVE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject ICT, TPACK, engineering teaching, phenomenography and conceptio en_US
dc.title Engineering University Teachers’ Conceptions of ICT Enhanced Teaching: Bangladesh Perspective en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics