Studying the effect of various contact materials in perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell

Shabnam, Shamaita

IUT Repository Home
→
Mechanical and Production Engineering (MPE)
→
Thesis
→
Undergraduate
→
2021
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Shabnam, Shamaita
dc.date.accessioned	2022-04-30T03:09:57Z
dc.date.available	2022-04-30T03:09:57Z
dc.date.issued	2021-03-30
dc.identifier.citation	[1] “Perovskites Solar Cell Structure, Efficiency & More \| Ossila.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ossila.com/pages/perovskites-and-perovskite-solarcells-an-introduction#ref6. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021]. [2] M. A. Green, Y. Hishikawa, E. D. Dunlop, D. H. Levi, J. Hohl-Ebinger, and A. W. Y. Ho-Baillie, “Solar cell efficiency tables (version 52),” Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 427–436, 2018. [3] “Perovskite Solar \| Perovskite-Info.” [Online]. Available: https://www.perovskite-info.com/perovskite-solar. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021]. [4] “Perovskite solar cell: Hero, villain or just plain fantasy?” [Online]. Available: https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2020/02/perovskite-solar-cells-herovillain-or-just-plain-fantasy/. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021]. [5] “Oxford PV closes £65 million funding round \| Perovskite-Info.” [Online]. Available: https://www.perovskite-info.com/oxford-pv-closes-65-millionfunding-round. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021]. [6] “Dyesol declares perovskite stability breakthrough \| Perovskite-Info.” [Online]. Available: https://www.perovskite-info.com/dyesol-declares-perovskitestability-breakthrough. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021]. [7] “solar cell \| Definition, Working Principle, & Development \| Britannica.” [Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/technology/solarcell#ref289540. [Accessed: 11-Mar-2021]. [8] R. Amantea, “An introduction to modeling and simulation,” R.C.A. Rev., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 281–288, 1985. [9] A. De Vos, “Detailed balance limit of the efficiency of tandem solar cells,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 839–846, May 1980. [10] J. Xu et al., “Triple-halide wide-band gap perovskites with suppressed phase segregation for efficient tandems,” Science (80-. )., vol. 367, no. 6482, pp. 1097–1104, 2020. 36 [11] Y. Hou et al., “Efficient tandem solar cells with solution-processed perovskite on textured crystalline silicon,” Science (80-. )., vol. 367, no. 6482, pp. 1135– 1140, 2020. [12] B. Chen et al., “Blade-Coated Perovskites on Textured Silicon for 26%- Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells,” Joule, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 850–864, 2020. [13] M. Jošt, L. Kegelmann, L. Korte, and S. Albrecht, “Monolithic Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells: A Review of the Present Status and Advanced Characterization Methods Toward 30% Efficiency,” Adv. Energy Mater., vol. 10, no. 26, 2020. [14] J. P. Mailoa et al., “A 2-terminal perovskite/silicon multijunction solar cell enabled by a silicon tunnel junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 106, no. 12, 2015. [15] J. Werner et al., “Zinc tin oxide as high-temperature stable recombination layer for mesoscopic perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 109, no. 23, pp. 2–6, 2016. [16] Y. Wu et al., “Monolithic perovskite/silicon-homojunction tandem solar cell with over 22% efficiency,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2472– 2479, 2017. [17] J. Zheng et al., “Large area efficient interface layer free monolithic perovskite/homo-junction-silicon tandem solar cell with over 20% efficiency,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2432–2443, 2018. [18] J. Zheng et al., “21.8% Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Homo-JunctionSilicon Tandem Solar Cell on 16 cm2,” ACS Energy Lett., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2299–2300, 2018. [19] D. Rached and R. Mostefaoui, “Influence of the front contact barrier height on the Indium Tin Oxide/hydrogenated p-doped amorphous silicon heterojunction solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 15, pp. 5087–5092, 2008. [20] M. Stolterfoht, V. M. Le Corre, M. Feuerstein, P. Caprioglio, L. J. A. Koster, and D. Neher, “Voltage-Dependent Photoluminescence and How It Correlates 37 with the Fill Factor and Open-Circuit Voltage in Perovskite Solar Cells,” ACS Energy Lett., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2887–2892, 2019. [21] E. L. Unger et al., “Hysteresis and transient behavior in current-voltage measurements of hybrid-perovskite absorber solar cells,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 3690–3698, 2014. [22] R. Cheacharoen, N. Rolston, D. Harwood, K. A. Bush, R. H. Dauskardt, and M. D. McGehee, “Design and understanding of encapsulated perovskite solar cells to withstand temperature cycling,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 144–150, 2018. [23] K. Ellmer, R. Wendt, and R. Cebulla, “ZnO/ZnO:Al window and contact layer for thin film solar cells: high rate deposition by simultaneous rf and dc magnetron sputtering,” Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf., pp. 851–854, 1996. [24] M. F. Ali and M. F. Hossain, “Influence of Front and Back Contacts on Photovoltaic Performances of p-n Homojunction Si Solar Cell: Considering an Electron-Blocking Layer,” Int. J. Photoenergy, vol. 2017, 2017. [25] S. Ahmed et al., “Simulation studies of Sn-based perovskites with Cu backcontact for non-toxic and non-corrosive devices,” J. Mater. Res., vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 2789–2795, 2019. [26] Afrasiab et al., “Optimization of efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell,” Optik (Stuttg)., vol. 208, no. January, p. 164573, 2020. [27] M. Aitezaz Hussain, S. Khan, A. Rahim, A. Jan, and M. Rashid, “Optimization of Power Conversion Efficiency for Perovskite Solar Cell using GPVDM,” Int. J. Eng. Work., vol. 07, no. 02, pp. 109–115, 2020. [28] W. Farooq et al., “Thin-Film Tandem Organic Solar Cells with Improved Efficiency,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 74093–74100, 2020. [29] M. Sittirak, J. Ponrat, K. Thubthong, P. Kumnorkaew, J. Lek-Uthai, and Y. Infahsaeng, “The effects of layer thickness and charge mobility on performance of FAI:MABr:PbI2:PbBr2 perovskite solar cells: GPVDM simulation 38 approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1380, no. 1, 2019. [30] A. Hima, N. Lakhdar, B. Benhaoua, A. Saadoune, I. Kemerchou, and F. Rogti, “An optimized perovskite solar cell designs for high conversion efficiency,” Superlattices Microstruct., vol. 129, no. March, pp. 240–246, 2019. [31] R. Yasodharan, A. P. Senthilkumar, J. Ajayan, and P. Mohankumar, “Effects of layer thickness on Power Conversion Efficiency in Perovskite solar cell: A numerical simulation approach,” 2019 5th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst. ICACCS 2019, pp. 1132–1135, 2019. [32] “Spiro-OMeTAD (Spiro-MeOTAD) \| CAS 207739-72-8 \| Ossila.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ossila.com/products/spiroometad?variant=23115455681. [Accessed: 12-Mar-2021]. [33] “Fill Factor \| PVEducation.” [Online]. Available: https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/solar-cell-operation/fill-factor. [Accessed: 13-Mar-2021].	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1450
dc.description	Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Hamidur Rahman, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering(MPE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704. Bangladesh.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	In the last decade, Perovskite based solar cells have seen massive enhancement, as opposed to conventional silicon (Si) based solar cells. As a result, its research has attracted a lot of attention in recent times. The material, still being under extensive research, has shown much changes in power conversion efficiency due to factors such as thickness, irradiance, temperature, and etcetera. This thesis looks into the effect of different types of optical materials if used as contact materials on the open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current and power conversion efficiency, in the case of a perovskite/Si tandem solar cell. The software used for this study is GPVDM software. Built-in electrical parameters have been used in the simulation procedure and the materials changed within the layers to see the effect. The simulations utilised Maxwell-Boltzmann analysis to perform the task. The results show that the type of contact material affects the efficiency, and that different oxides give varying efficiencies. Metal contacts showed better performance when used as back contact, while oxides were more efficient on the front. The work also compares the performance of a tandem cell to the performance of a simple silicon base solar cell, where the results indicate improved performance for the tandem cells. This study will aid in understanding how perovskite/Si tandem cells behave in terms of its contact materials, so that more enhancement can be achieved and improved upon in further studies.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering	en_US
dc.subject	Perovskite, power conversion efficiency, contact materials, tandem solar cell, GPVDM	en_US
dc.title	Studying the effect of various contact materials in perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US