Data-Driven-Approach-to-Construct-Flow-Field-of-A-2d-Airfoil

Chowdhury, Nahiyan; Hossain, Fahmid; Mahi-al-rashid, Abrar

IUT Repository Home
→
Mechanical and Production Engineering (MPE)
→
Thesis
→
Undergraduate
→
2022
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Chowdhury, Nahiyan
dc.contributor.author	Hossain, Fahmid
dc.contributor.author	Mahi-al-rashid, Abrar
dc.date.accessioned	2023-03-29T08:57:09Z
dc.date.available	2023-03-29T08:57:09Z
dc.date.issued	2022-06-10
dc.identifier.citation	[1] S. A. Niederer, M. S. Sacks, M. Girolami, and K. Willcox, “Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial,” Nature Computational Science 2021 1:5, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 313–320, May 2021, doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00072-5. [2] M. P. Brenner, J. D. Eldredge, and J. B. Freund, “Perspective on machine learning for advancing fluid mechanics,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 4, no. 10, p. 100501, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.100501. [3] O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9351, pp. 234–241, 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28. [4] “Attention is All you Need.” https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aaAbstract.html (accessed Jun. 04, 2022). [5] “What is Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)? \| SimScale \| SimScale.” https://www.simscale.com/docs/simwiki/cfd-computational-fluid-dynamics/what-is-cfdcomputational-fluid-dynamics/ (accessed May 07, 2022). [6] J. L. Hess and A. M. O. Smith, “Calculation of Potential Flow About Arbitrary Bodies,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 8, no. C, pp. 1–138, 1967, doi: 10.1016/0376- 0421(67)90003-6. [7] S. Samant et al., 25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 1987. doi: 10.2514/6.1987-34. [8] R. Carmichael and L. Erickson, 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 1981. doi: 10.2514/6.1981-1255. [9] F. White, “Viscous Fluid Flow (McGraw-Hill Mechanical Engineering),” p. 640, 2005. [10] V. Thomée, “From finite differences to finite elements A short history of numerical analysis of partial differential equations,” Numerical Analysis: Historical Developments in the 20th Century, pp. 361–414, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-50617-7.50016-1. [11] J. Tu, G.-H. Yeoh, and C. Liu, Computational Fluid Dyanmics, vol. 53, no. 9. 2013. [12] A. Sharma, Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030- 72884-7. [13] “SOLIDWORKS.” https://www.solidworks.com/ (accessed May 12, 2022). [14] “AutoCAD Software \| Get Prices & Buy Official AutoCAD 2023 \| Autodesk.” 55 https://www.autodesk.com/products/autocad/overview?term=1-YEAR&tab=subscription (accessed May 12, 2022). [15] “Introduction to Ansys DesignModeler CFD \| Ansys Training.” https://www.ansys.com/trainingcenter/course-catalog/fluids/introduction-to-ansys-designmodeler (accessed May 12, 2022). [16] “Ansys SpaceClaim \| 3D CAD Modeling Software.” https://www.ansys.com/products/3ddesign/ansys-spaceclaim (accessed May 12, 2022). [17] “What is a Mesh? \| SimWiki Documentation \| SimScale.” https://www.simscale.com/docs/simwiki/preprocessing/what-is-a-mesh/ (accessed May 12, 2022). [18] “Handbook of Grid Generation - Google Books.” https://books.google.com.bd/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fxABEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=T hompson,+J.+F.,+Soni,+B.+K.,+Wheatherill,+N.+P.,+%E2%80%9CHandbook+of+Grid+Genera tion%E2%80%9D,+1999&ots=0VUygSSuAr&sig=YinXFxQV5IUBAJKXuPM6wnZ2aY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed May 12, 2022). [19] “Quick overview of different ‘Boundary Conditions’ in CFD.” https://www.manchestercfd.co.uk/post/quick-overview-of-different-boundary-conditions-in-cfd (accessed May 12, 2022). [20] J. Gorman, S. Bhattacharyya, L. Cheng, and J. Abraham, “Turbulence Models Commonly Used in CFD,” Computational Fluid Dynamics [Working Title], Aug. 2021, doi: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.99784. [21] R. Vinuesa and S. L. Brunton, “The Potential of Machine Learning to Enhance Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Oct. 2021, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.02085. [22] J. Ling, A. Kurzawski, and J. Templeton, “Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 807, pp. 155–166, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1017/JFM.2016.615. [23] K. Duraisamy, G. Iaccarino, and H. Xiao, “Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data,” https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547, vol. 51, pp. 357–377, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV-FLUID-010518-040547. [24] S. E. Ahmed, S. Pawar, O. San, A. Rasheed, T. Iliescu, and B. R. Noack, “On closures for reduced order models—A spectrum of first-principle to machine-learned avenues,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 9, p. 091301, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0061577. [25] O. Obiols-Sales, A. Vishnu, N. Malaya, and A. Chandramowliswharan, “CFDNet: A deep learning-based accelerator for fluid simulations,” Proceedings of the International Conference on 56 Supercomputing, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1145/3392717.3392772. [26] J. N. Kutz, “Deep learning in fluid dynamics,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 814, pp. 1–4, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1017/JFM.2016.803. [27] J. X. Wang, J. L. Wu, and H. Xiao, “Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 034603, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.2.034603/FIGURES/11/MEDIUM. [28] C. Jiang, R. Vinuesa, R. Chen, J. Mi, S. Laima, and H. Li, “An interpretable framework of datadriven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 5, p. 055133, May 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0048909. [29] J. Weatheritt and R. Sandberg, “A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress–strain relationship,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 325, pp. 22–37, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JCP.2016.08.015. [30] J. L. Wu, H. Xiao, and E. Paterson, “Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 074602, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.3.074602/FIGURES/16/MEDIUM. [31] Y. Mi, M. Ishii, and L. H. Tsoukalas, “Flow regime identification methodology with neural networks and two-phase flow models,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 204, no. 1–3, pp. 87–100, Feb. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00325-3. [32] A. Beck, D. Flad, and C.-D. Munz, “Deep neural networks for data-driven LES closure models,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 398, p. 108910, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108910. [33] C. J. Lapeyre, A. Misdariis, N. Cazard, D. Veynante, and T. Poinsot, “Training convolutional neural networks to estimate turbulent sub-grid scale reaction rates,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 203, pp. 255–264, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.019. [34] G. Novati, H. L. de Laroussilhe, and P. Koumoutsakos, “Automating turbulence modelling by multi-agent reinforcement learning,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–96, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00272-0. [35] Y. Guo, Y. Liu, A. Oerlemans, S. Lao, S. Wu, and M. S. Lew, “Deep learning for visual understanding: A review,” Neurocomputing, vol. 187, pp. 27–48, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2015.09.116. [36] M. Ma, J. Lu, and G. Tryggvason, “Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for a simple bubbly system,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 27, no. 9, p. 092101, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4930004. 57 [37] F. Gibou, D. Hyde, and R. Fedkiw, “Sharp interface approaches and deep learning techniques for multiphase flows,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 380, pp. 442–463, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JCP.2018.05.031. [38] S. N. Skinner and H. Zare-Behtash, “State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 62, pp. 933–962, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.ASOC.2017.09.030. [39] Y. Bar-Sinai, S. Hoyer, J. Hickey, and M. P. Brenner, “Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 116, no. 31, pp. 15344–15349, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1814058116. [40] J. Jeon and S. J. Kim, “FVM Network to Reduce Computational Cost of CFD Simulation,” International Journal of Energy Research, May 2021, doi: 10.1002/er.7879. [41] B. Stevens and T. Colonius, “FiniteNet: A Fully Convolutional LSTM Network Architecture for Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equations,” Feb. 2020, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.03014. [42] K. Fukami, Y. Nabae, K. Kawai, and K. Fukagata, “Synthetic turbulent inflow generator using machine learning,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 4, no. 6, p. 064603, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.4.064603/FIGURES/11/MEDIUM. [43] Y. Morita, S. Rezaeiravesh, N. Tabatabaei, R. Vinuesa, K. Fukagata, and P. Schlatter, “Applying Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process regression to computational fluid dynamics problems,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 449, p. 110788, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JCP.2021.110788. [44] W. Tang et al., “Study on a Poisson’s equation solver based on deep learning technique,” 2017 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems Symposium, EDAPS 2017, vol. 2018-January, pp. 1–3, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/EDAPS.2017.8277017. [45] A. G. Ozbay, A. Hamzehloo, S. Laizet, P. Tzirakis, G. Rizos, and B. Schuller, “Poisson CNN: Convolutional neural networks for the solution of the Poisson equation on a Cartesian mesh,” Data-Centric Engineering, vol. 2, no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1017/DCE.2021.7. [46] R. Vinuesa, S. M. Hosseini, A. Hanifi, D. S. Henningson, and P. Schlatter, “Pressure-Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers Developing Around a Wing Section,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 99, no. 3–4, pp. 613–641, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S10494-017-9840-Z. [47] G. Novati, H. L. de Laroussilhe, and P. Koumoutsakos, “Automating turbulence modelling by multi-agent reinforcement learning,” Nature Machine Intelligence 2021 3:1, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87– 96, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00272-0. [48] R. Vinuesa and S. L. Brunton, “The Potential of Machine Learning to Enhance Computational Fluid Dynamics,” pp. 1–13, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02085 58 [49] H. Eivazi, S. le Clainche, S. Hoyas, and R. Vinuesa, “Towards extraction of orthogonal and parsimonious non-linear modes from turbulent flows,” Sep. 2021, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.01514. [50] L. Guastoni et al., “Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantities,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 928, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1017/JFM.2021.812. [51] Y. Bar-Sinai, S. Hoyer, J. Hickey, and M. P. Brenner, “Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 116, no. 31, pp. 15344–15349, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1814058116. [52] B. Stevens and T. Colonius, “Enhancement of shock-capturing methods via machine learning,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 483–496, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S00162-020-00531-1/FIGURES/12. [53] C. W. Rowley and S. T. M. Dawson, “Model Reduction for Flow Analysis and Control,” http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060042, vol. 49, pp. 387–417, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV-FLUID-010816-060042. [54] K. Taira et al., “Modal analysis of fluid flows: Applications and outlook,” AIAA Journal, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 998–1022, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.2514/1.J058462/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/FIGURE19.JPEG. [55] “The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows \| CiNii Research.” https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571980075051475712 (accessed May 14, 2022). [56] V. Sekar, Q. Jiang, C. Shu, and B. C. Khoo, “Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 31, no. 5, p. 057103, May 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5094943. [57] “Airfoil data information.” http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/ (accessed May 11, 2022). [58] P. R. Spalart and S. R. Allmaras, “One-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows,” Recherche aerospatiale, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 1994, doi: 10.2514/6.1992-439. [59] S. M. Nazia Fathima, R. Tamilselvi, M. Parisa Beham, and D. Sabarinathan, “Diagnosis of Osteoporosis using modified U-net architecture with attention unit in DEXA and X-ray images,” Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 953–973, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3233/XST-200692. [60] H. Kim, J. Kim, S. Won, and C. Lee, “Unsupervised deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulence,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 910, 2021, doi: 10.1017/JFM.2020.1028. [61] A. Güemes, S. Discetti, A. Ianiro, B. Sirmacek, H. Azizpour, and R. Vinuesa, “From coarse wall measurements to turbulent velocity fields through deep learning,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 59 7, p. 075121, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0058346. [62] K. Fukami, T. Nakamura, and K. Fukagata, “Convolutional neural network based hierarchical autoencoder for nonlinear mode decomposition of fluid field data,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 32, no. 9, p. 095110, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1063/5.0020721. [63] “The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows \| CiNii Research.” https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571980075051475712 (accessed May 14, 2022). [64] R. Wang, R. Walters, and R. Yu, “Incorporating Symmetry into Deep Dynamics Models for Improved Generalization,” Feb. 2020, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.03061. [65] J. C. Loiseau and S. L. Brunton, “Constrained sparse Galerkin regression,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 838, pp. 42–67, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1017/JFM.2017.823. [66] H. Frezat, G. Balarac, J. le Sommer, R. Fablet, and R. Lguensat, “Physical invariance in neural networks for subgrid-scale scalar flux modeling,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 024607, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.6.024607/FIGURES/17/MEDIUM. [67] O. Mesnard and L. A. Barba, “Reproducible and Replicable Computational Fluid Dynamics: It’s Harder Than You Think,” Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 44–55, 2017, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2017.3151254. [68] L. A. Barba, “The hard road to reproducibility,” Science (1979), vol. 354, no. 6308, p. 142, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.354.6308.142/ASSET/35E106D4-FB4C-41F4-A7AEEDEFCD081B90/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/354_142_F1.JPEG	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1798
dc.description	Supervised by Dr. Md Rezwanul Karim, (Co-Supervisor) Mr. Tahsin Sejat Saniat Lecturer, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering (MPE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh. This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical and Production Engineering, 2022.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Machine learning is quickly becoming a significant scientific computer tool, with enormous potential to broaden the field of computational fluid dynamics. Various research has been conducted in the recent past which emphasized on how the use of different Machine Learning algorithm is playing an important role in the enhancement of computational fluid dynamics. In this work we try to discuss about how we created an architecture of a Machine Learning algorithm by using U-net, which is a type of convolutional neural network and tried to apply it in order to reproduce a flow field around a 2D airfoil, which can be easily, if not quickly, produced using CFD analysis. The principal aim of this thesis is to check whether our Deep learning architecture is capable of providing an acceptable prediction of the flow field or not. If the flow field from DL matches with that of CFD, then we can use this observation for further study and if it does not match, there is still room for further correction. In order to execute the experiment, 3325 CFD simulations were carried out and the flow fields achieved from the simulation as the result of the experiment were separated into two groups.80% of the data was taken for training the DL algorithm and 20% were used for validation. After implementing the DL algorithm, some of the results were found to be almost similar to the results produced from the CFD simulation.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.subject	Computational Fluid Dynamic, Machine learning, Deep learning, U-net, Airfoil, Attention	en_US
dc.title	Data-Driven-Approach-to-Construct-Flow-Field-of-A-2d-Airfoil	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US