Identifying The Best Pair of Electrode For  Industrial Wastewater Treatment by  Electrocoagulation

Hasan, Alvy; Nahian, Tamzid Kamal; Antar, Rafiul Hasan

IUT Repository Home
→
Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE)
→
Thesis
→
Undergraduate
→
2023
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Hasan, Alvy
dc.contributor.author	Nahian, Tamzid Kamal
dc.contributor.author	Antar, Rafiul Hasan
dc.date.accessioned	2023-12-02T09:43:20Z
dc.date.available	2023-12-02T09:43:20Z
dc.date.issued	2023-05-30
dc.identifier.citation	[1] A. Kumar, S. Gururkula, K. Vishwavidyalaya, V. Kumar, and G. Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, “Overview of Electrolytic treatment: An alternative technology for purification of wastewater,” 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216350479 [2] A. Tahreen, M. S. Jami, and F. Ali, “Role of electrocoagulation in wastewater treatment: A developmental review,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 37. Elsevier Ltd, Oct. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101440. [3] G. Chen, “Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment,” Sep Purif Technol, vol. 38, no. 1, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.006. [4] A. K. Chopra, A. Kumar, S. Gururkula, K. Vishwavidyalaya, V. Kumar, and G. Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, “Overview of Electrolytic treatment: An alternative technology for purification of wastewater Bio-remediation of contaminants along with bio-energy production View project Phytoremediation of Industrial Effluents using Aquatic macrophytes View project,” 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216350479 [5] A. N. Módenes, F. R. Espinoza-Quiñones, D. R. Manenti, F. H. Borba, S. M. Palácio, and A. Colombo, “Performance evaluation of a photo-Fenton process applied to pollutant removal from textile effluents in a batch system,” J Environ Manage, vol. 104, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.032. [6] A. Benhadji, M. Taleb Ahmed, and R. Maachi, “Electrocoagulation and effect of cathode materials on the removal of pollutants from tannery wastewater of Rouïba,” Desalination, vol. 277, no. 1–3, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.014. [7] H. C. Tao et al., “Removal of heavy metals from fly ash leachate using combined bioelectrochemical systems and electrolysis,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 264, pp. 1–7, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.057. [8] H. Hossini, G. Mohamadiyan, H. Masoumbeigi, and A. Rezaee, “Optimization of Chromium reductionand Sludge productionbybipolar Electrocoagulation us-ing Response Surface Methodology,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259971666 [9] A. Arora, R. Kaur, A. Kaur, N. Singh, and S. Sharma, “TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER THROUGH ELECTROCOAGULATION,” Poll Res, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 394–403, 2018. [10] M. J. Matteson, R. L. Dobson, R. W. Glenn, N. S. Kukunoor, W. H. Waits, and E. J. Clayfield, “Electrocoagulation and separation of aqueous suspensions of ultrafine 46 particles,” Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp, vol. 104, no. 1, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0927-7757(95)03259-G. [11] X. Chen, G. Chen, and P. L. Yue, “Separation of pollutants from restaurant wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Sep Purif Technol, vol. 19, no. 1–2, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00072-6. [12] “Electroflotation-A critical review.” [13] M. K. Oden and H. Sari-Erkan, “Treatment of metal plating wastewater using iron electrode by electrocoagulation process: Optimization and process performance,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 119, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.08.001. [14] D. T. Moussa, M. H. El-Naas, M. Nasser, and M. J. Al-Marri, “A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges,” J Environ Manage, vol. 186, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.032.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1978
dc.description	Supervised by Dr. Amimul Ahsan, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Islamic University of Technology (IUT) Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Each year, a large number of businesses release a substantial quantity of wastewater into the environment. To treat this wastewater and lower the level of contaminants, many techniques are used. Sediment and light suspensions that float are two different types of contaminants that are removed from the wastewater during the electrochemical process of emulsification. By electrochemically dissolving sacrificial anodes, usually made of iron or aluminum, the electrocoagulation (EC) procedure disturbs pollutants that are suspended, dissolved, or emulsified. This method has the potential to remove both organic and inorganic pollutants that can be present in different types of wastewater. The pH, electrode type, operation time, and current density are some of the factors that affect how effective the EC process is. Examining the most pertinent recently released studies on this subject is the goal of this study. Electrode passivation and energy consumption are the two main issues with the EC technique. Using 36 different variations of electrode pair, the treated sample is tested different parameter. The best value for additional efficiency of E.C & Salinity for Al(+) and Zn(-) pair is 147.376 & 143.75 respectively. No other electrode pair have more than one higher parameter value. Compared to other conventional technologies, EC has benefits including lower operating costs and energy consumption. The following variables are controlled in this study: pH, BOD, COD, TSS, TDS and Salinity.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering(CEE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.title	Identifying The Best Pair of Electrode For Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Electrocoagulation	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US