Sarcasm Generation with Emoji: A Multi-Modular Framework Incorporating Valence Reversal & Semantic Incongruity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sogir, Tasmia Binte
dc.contributor.author Kader, Faria Binte
dc.contributor.author Nujat, Nafisa Hossain
dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-18T06:27:41Z
dc.date.available 2024-01-18T06:27:41Z
dc.date.issued 2023-05-30
dc.identifier.citation [1] Tuhin Chakrabarty, Debanjan Ghosh, Smaranda Muresan, and Nanyun Peng. R3: Reverse, retrieve, and rank for sarcasm generation with commonsense knowledge. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. [2] Aditya Joshi, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark James Carman. Sarcasmbot: An open-source sarcasm-generation module for chatbots. In WISDOM Workshop at KDD, 2015. [3] Abhijit Mishra, Tarun Tater, and Karthik Sankaranarayanan. A modular architec ture for unsupervised sarcasm generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 6144–6154, 2019. [4] Aditya Joshi, Diptesh Kanojia, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark Carman. Sar casm suite: a browser-based engine for sarcasm detection and generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 31, 2017. [5] Spencer Cappallo, Thomas Mensink, and Cees GM Snoek. Image2emoji: Zero-shot emoji prediction for visual media. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 1311–1314, 2015. [6] Santosh Kumar Bharti, Bakhtyar Vachha, RK Pradhan, Korra Sathya Babu, and Sanjay Kumar Jena. Sarcastic sentiment detection in tweets streamed in real time: a big data approach. Digital Communications and Networks, 2(3):108–121, 2016. [7] Jayashree Subramanian, Varun Sridharan, Kai Shu, and Huan Liu. Exploiting emojis for sarcasm detection. In International conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction and behavior representation in model ing and simulation, pages 70–80. Springer, 2019. [8] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sand hini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. 66 Bibliography 67 Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Inter national conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021. [9] Basant Agarwal, Namita Mittal, Pooja Bansal, and Sonal Garg. Sentiment analy sis using common-sense and context information. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2015, 2015. [10] Aditya Joshi, Samarth Agrawal, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark Carman. Ex pect the unexpected: Harnessing sentence completion for sarcasm detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06151, 2017. [11] Milagros Fern´andez-Gavilanes, Jonathan Juncal-Mart´ınez, Silvia Garc´ıa-M´endez, Enrique Costa-Montenegro, and Francisco Javier Gonz´alez-Casta˜no. Creating emoji lexica from unsupervised sentiment analysis of their descriptions. Expert Systems with Applications, 103:74–91, 2018. [12] Muhammad Abulaish and Ashraf Kamal. Self-deprecating sarcasm detec tion: an amalgamation of rule-based and machine learning approach. In 2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), pages 574– 579. IEEE, 2018. [13] Karthik Sundararajan and Anandhakumar Palanisamy. Multi-rule based ensem ble feature selection model for sarcasm type detection in twitter. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2020, 2020. [14] Ashraf Kamal and Muhammad Abulaish. An lstm-based deep learning approach for detecting self-deprecating sarcasm in textual data. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 201–210, 2019. [15] Silviu Oprea and Walid Magdy. Exploring author context for detecting intended vs perceived sarcasm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.11932, 2019. [16] Richard J Gerrig and Yevgeniya Goldvarg. Additive effects in the perception of sarcasm: Situational disparity and echoic mention. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(4): 197–208, 2000. [17] Deirdre Wilson. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116 (10):1722–1743, 2006. [18] John D Campbell and Albert N Katz. Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes, 49(6):459–480, 2012. [19] Ellen Riloff, Ashequl Qadir, Prafulla Surve, Lalindra De Silva, Nathan Gilbert, and Ruihong Huang. Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative Bibliography 68 situation. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 704–714, 2013. [20] Christian Burgers, Margot Van Mulken, and Peter Jan Schellens. Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres. Journal of Language and Social Psy chology, 31(3):290–310, 2012. [21] Rachel Giora. On irony and negation. Discourse processes, 19(2):239–264, 1995. [22] Suzana Ili´c, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Jorge A Balazs, and Yutaka Matsuo. Deep contextualized word representations for detecting sarcasm and irony. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09795, 2018. [23] Jona Dimovska, Marina Angelovska, Dejan Gjorgjevikj, and Gjorgji Madjarov. Sarcasm and irony detection in english tweets. In International Conference on Telecommunications, pages 120–131. Springer, 2018. [24] Rolandos Alexandros Potamias, Georgios Siolas, and Andreas-Georgios Stafy lopatis. A transformer-based approach to irony and sarcasm detection. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(23):17309–17320, 2020. [25] Usman Naseem, Imran Razzak, Peter Eklund, and Katarzyna Musial. Towards improved deep contextual embedding for the identification of irony and sarcasm. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2020. [26] Jennifer Ling and Roman Klinger. An empirical, quantitative analysis of the differences between sarcasm and irony. In European semantic web conference, pages 203–216. Springer, 2016. [27] Maria Khokhlova, Viviana Patti, and Paolo Rosso. Distinguishing between irony and sarcasm in social media texts: Linguistic observations. In 2016 International FRUCT Conference on Intelligence, Social Media and Web (ISMW FRUCT), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2016. [28] Diana G Maynard and Mark A Greenwood. Who cares about sarcastic tweets? in vestigating the impact of sarcasm on sentiment analysis. In Lrec 2014 proceedings. ELRA, 2014. [29] Mikhail Khodak, Nikunj Saunshi, and Kiran Vodrahalli. A large self-annotated corpus for sarcasm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05579, 2017. [30] Yitao Cai, Huiyu Cai, and Xiaojun Wan. Multi-modal sarcasm detection in twitter with hierarchical fusion model. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2506–2515, 2019. Bibliography 69 [31] Santosh Kumar Bharti, Korra Sathya Babu, and Sanjay Kumar Jena. Parsing based sarcasm sentiment recognition in twitter data. In 2015 IEEE/ACM In ternational Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pages 1373–1380. IEEE, 2015. [32] Santosh Kumar Bharti, Ramkrushna Pradhan, Korra Sathya Babu, and San jay Kumar Jena. Sarcasm analysis on twitter data using machine learning ap proaches. Trends in Social Network Analysis, pages 51–76, 2017. [33] Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, Devamanyu Hazarika, and Prateek Vij. A deeper look into sarcastic tweets using deep convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.08815, 2016. [34] Aniruddha Ghosh and Tony Veale. Fracking sarcasm using neural network. In Proceedings of the 7th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sen timent and social media analysis, pages 161–169, 2016. [35] Tanvi Dadu and Kartikey Pant. Sarcasm detection using context separators in online discourse. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 51–55, 2020. [36] Avinash Kumar, Vishnu Teja Narapareddy, Pranjal Gupta, Veerubhotla Aditya Srikanth, Lalita Bhanu Murthy Neti, and Aruna Malapati. Adversarial and aux iliary features-aware bert for sarcasm detection. In 8th ACM IKDD CODS and 26th COMAD, pages 163–170. 2021. [37] Aditya Joshi, Pranav Goel, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark Carman. Auto matic identification of sarcasm target: An introductory approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.07091, 2016. [38] Yi Tay, Luu Anh Tuan, Siu Cheung Hui, and Jian Su. Reasoning with sarcasm by reading in-between. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02856, 2018. [39] Devamanyu Hazarika, Soujanya Poria, Sruthi Gorantla, Erik Cambria, Roger Zim mermann, and Rada Mihalcea. Cascade: Contextual sarcasm detection in online discussion forums. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.06413, 2018. [40] Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Sixing Wu, Zhigang Yuan, Junxin Liu, and Yongfeng Huang. Thu ngn at semeval-2018 task 2: Residual cnn-lstm network with attention for english emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 410–414, 2018. [41] Aditya Joshi, Vaibhav Tripathi, Kevin Patel, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark Carman. Are word embedding-based features useful for sarcasm detection? arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.00883, 2016. Bibliography 70 [42] Paras Dharwal, Tanupriya Choudhury, Rajat Mittal, and Praveen Kumar. Auto matic sarcasm detection using feature selection. In 2017 3rd International Con ference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT), pages 29–34. IEEE, 2017. [43] Ameeta Agrawal and Aijun An. Affective representations for sarcasm detection. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1029–1032, 2018. [44] Natalie Parde and Rodney Nielsen. Detecting sarcasm is extremely easy;-. In Proceedings of the workshop on computational semantics beyond events and roles, pages 21–26, 2018. [45] Elena Filatova. Irony and sarcasm: Corpus generation and analysis using crowd sourcing. In Lrec, pages 392–398. Citeseer, 2012. [46] Shereen Oraby, Vrindavan Harrison, Amita Misra, Ellen Riloff, and Marilyn Walker. Are you serious?: Rhetorical questions and sarcasm in social media dialog. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05305, 2017. [47] Xinyu Wang, Xiaowen Sun, Tan Yang, and Hongbo Wang. Building a bridge: a method for image-text sarcasm detection without pretraining on image-text data. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Natural Language Process ing Beyond Text, pages 19–29, 2020. [48] Hongliang Pan, Zheng Lin, Peng Fu, and Weiping Wang. Modeling the incongruity between sentence snippets for sarcasm detection. In ECAI 2020, pages 2132–2139. IOS Press, 2020. [49] Nan Xu, Zhixiong Zeng, and Wenji Mao. Reasoning with multimodal sarcastic tweets via modeling cross-modality contrast and semantic association. In Proceed ings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages 3777–3786, 2020. [50] Rossano Schifanella, Paloma De Juan, Joel Tetreault, and Liangliang Cao. De tecting sarcasm in multimodal social platforms. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 1136–1145, 2016. [51] Tom´aˇs Pt´aˇcek, Ivan Habernal, and Jun Hong. Sarcasm detection on czech and english twitter. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th international conference on computational linguistics: Technical papers, pages 213–223, 2014. [52] Francesco Barbieri, Horacio Saggion, and Francesco Ronzano. Modelling sarcasm in twitter, a novel approach. In proceedings of the 5th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, pages 50–58, 2014. Bibliography 71 [53] David Bamman and Noah Smith. Contextualized sarcasm detection on twitter. In proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, volume 9, pages 574–577, 2015. [54] Silvio Amir, Byron C Wallace, Hao Lyu, and Paula Carvalho M´ario J Silva. Mod elling context with user embeddings for sarcasm detection in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00976, 2016. [55] Meishan Zhang, Yue Zhang, and Guohong Fu. Tweet sarcasm detection using deep neural network. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Confer ence on Computational Linguistics: technical papers, pages 2449–2460, 2016. [56] Bjarke Felbo, Alan Mislove, Anders Søgaard, Iyad Rahwan, and Sune Lehmann. Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for de tecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00524, 2017. [57] Aniruddha Ghosh and Tony Veale. Magnets for sarcasm: Making sarcasm detec tion timely, contextual and very personal. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 482–491, 2017. [58] Anukarsh G Prasad, S Sanjana, Skanda M Bhat, and BS Harish. Sentiment anal ysis for sarcasm detection on streaming short text data. In 2017 2nd Interna tional Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications (ICKEA), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2017. [59] Christos Baziotis, Nikos Athanasiou, Georgios Paraskevopoulos, Nikolaos Ellinas, Athanasia Kolovou, and Alexandros Potamianos. Ntua-slp at semeval-2018 task 2: Predicting emojis using rnns with context-aware attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06657, 2018. [60] Debanjan Ghosh, Alexander R Fabbri, and Smaranda Muresan. Sarcasm analysis using conversation context. Computational Linguistics, 44(4):755–792, 2018. [61] Cynthia Van Hee, Els Lefever, and V´eronique Hoste. Semeval-2018 task 3: Irony detection in english tweets. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 39–50, 2018. [62] Navonil Majumder, Soujanya Poria, Haiyun Peng, Niyati Chhaya, Erik Cambria, and Alexander Gelbukh. Sentiment and sarcasm classification with multitask learning. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 34(3):38–43, 2019. [63] Akshi Kumar, Saurabh Raj Sangwan, Anshika Arora, Anand Nayyar, Mohamed Abdel-Basset, et al. Sarcasm detection using soft attention-based bidirectional Bibliography 72 long short-term memory model with convolution network. IEEE access, 7:23319– 23328, 2019. [64] Amit Kumar Jena, Aman Sinha, and Rohit Agarwal. C-net: Contextual network for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the second workshop on figurative language processing, pages 61–66, 2020. [65] Lakshya Kumar, Arpan Somani, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. ” having 2 hours to write a paper is fun!”: Detecting sarcasm in numerical portions of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01950, 2017. [66] Abhijeet Dubey, Lakshya Kumar, Arpan Somani, Aditya Joshi, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. “when numbers matter!”: Detecting sarcasm in numerical por tions of text. In Proceedings of the tenth workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, pages 72–80, 2019. [67] Dipto Das and Anthony J Clark. Sarcasm detection on facebook: A supervised learning approach. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Multi modal Interaction: Adjunct, pages 1–5, 2018. [68] Aytu˘g Onan. Topic-enriched word embeddings for sarcasm identification. In Com puter science on-line conference, pages 293–304. Springer, 2019. [69] Debanjan Ghosh, Alexander Richard Fabbri, and Smaranda Muresan. The role of conversation context for sarcasm detection in online interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06226, 2017. [70] K Sreelakshmi and PC Rafeeque. An effective approach for detection of sarcasm in tweets. In 2018 International CET Conference on Control, Communication, and Computing (IC4), pages 377–382. IEEE, 2018. [71] Tao Xiong, Peiran Zhang, Hongbo Zhu, and Yihui Yang. Sarcasm detection with self-matching networks and low-rank bilinear pooling. In The world wide web conference, pages 2115–2124, 2019. [72] Ramish Jamil, Imran Ashraf, Furqan Rustam, Eysha Saad, Arif Mehmood, and Gyu Sang Choi. Detecting sarcasm in multi-domain datasets using convolutional neural networks and long short term memory network model. PeerJ Computer Science, 7:e645, 2021. [73] Tanya Jain, Nilesh Agrawal, Garima Goyal, and Niyati Aggrawal. Sarcasm detec tion of tweets: A comparative study. In 2017 Tenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2017. Bibliography 73 [74] Ben Eisner, Tim Rockt¨aschel, Isabelle Augenstein, Matko Boˇsnjak, and Sebastian Riedel. emoji2vec: Learning emoji representations from their description. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08359, 2016. [75] Siti Khotijah, Jimmy Tirtawangsa, and Arie A Suryani. Using lstm for context based approach of sarcasm detection in twitter. In Proceedings of the 11th Inter national Conference on Advances in Information Technology, pages 1–7, 2020. [76] Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1532–1543, 2014. URL http://www.aclweb.org/ anthology/D14-1162. [77] Pulkit Mehndiratta and Devpriya Soni. Identification of sarcasm using word em beddings and hyperparameters tuning. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 22(4):465–489, 2019. [78] Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), 2010. [79] Damian Borth, Tao Chen, Rongrong Ji, and Shih-Fu Chang. Sentibank: large-scale ontology and classifiers for detecting sentiment and emotions in visual content. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 459– 460, 2013. [80] Antoine Bosselut, Hannah Rashkin, Maarten Sap, Chaitanya Malaviya, Asli Ce likyilmaz, and Yejin Choi. Comet: Commonsense transformers for automatic knowledge graph construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05317, 2019. [81] Shubhadeep Mukherjee and Pradip Kumar Bala. Sarcasm detection in microblogs using na¨ıve bayes and fuzzy clustering. Technology in Society, 48:19–27, 2017. [82] Roberto Gonz´alez-Ib´anez, Smaranda Muresan, and Nina Wacholder. Identifying sarcasm in twitter: a closer look. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 581–586, 2011. [83] Dmitry Davidov, Oren Tsur, and Ari Rappoport. Semi-supervised recognition of sarcasm in twitter and amazon. In Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on computational natural language learning, pages 107–116, 2010. Bibliography 74 [84] Santosh Kumar Bharti, Ramkrushna Pradhan, Korra Sathya Babu, and San jay Kumar Jena. Sarcastic sentiment detection based on types of sarcasm oc curring in twitter data. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 13(4):89–108, 2017. [85] Aditya Joshi, Vinita Sharma, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 757– 762, 2015. [86] Gavin Abercrombie and Dirk Hovy. Putting sarcasm detection into context: The effects of class imbalance and manual labelling on supervised machine classifica tion of twitter conversations. In Proceedings of the ACL 2016 student research workshop, pages 107–113, 2016. [87] Shubhadeep Mukherjee and Pradip Kumar Bala. Detecting sarcasm in customer tweets: an nlp based approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2017. [88] Sakshi Thakur, Sarbjeet Singh, and Makhan Singh. Detecting sarcasm in text. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pages 996–1005. Springer, 2018. [89] Akshay Khatri et al. Sarcasm detection in tweets with bert and glove embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11512, 2020. [90] Christopher Ifeanyi Eke, Azah Norman, Liyana Shuib, Faith B Fatokun, and Isaiah Omame. The significance of global vectors representation in sarcasm analysis. In 2020 International Conference in Mathematics, Computer Engineering and Com puter Science (ICMCECS), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2020. [91] Karthik Sundararajan, J Vijay Saravana, and Anandhakumar Palanisamy. Textual feature ensemble-based sarcasm detection in twitter data. In Intelligence in Big Data Technologies—Beyond the Hype, pages 443–450. Springer, 2021. [92] Arghasree Banerjee, Mayukh Bhattacharjee, Kushankur Ghosh, and Sankhadeep Chatterjee. Synthetic minority oversampling in addressing imbalanced sarcasm detection in social media. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(47):35995–36031, 2020. [93] Mattia Antonino Di Gangi, Giosu´e Lo Bosco, and Giovanni Pilato. Effectiveness of data-driven induction of semantic spaces and traditional classifiers for sarcasm detection. Natural Language Engineering, 25(2):257–285, 2019. Bibliography 75 [94] Thomas K Landauer, Peter W Foltz, and Darrell Laham. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse processes, 25(2-3):259–284, 1998. [95] Saurabh Porwal, Gaurav Ostwal, Anagha Phadtare, Mohini Pandey, and Man isha V Marathe. Sarcasm detection using recurrent neural network. In 2018 second international conference on intelligent computing and control systems (ICICCS), pages 746–748. IEEE, 2018. [96] Sayed Saniya Salim, Agrawal Nidhi Ghanshyam, Darkunde Mayur Ashok, Dun garpur Burhanuddin Mazahir, and Bhushan S Thakare. Deep lstm-rnn with word embedding for sarcasm detection on twitter. In 2020 international conference for emerging technology (INCET), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2020. [Guo and Shah] Nick Guo and Ruchir Shah. Finding sarcasm in reddit postings: A deep learning approach. [97] Yufeng Diao, Hongfei Lin, Liang Yang, Xiaochao Fan, Yonghe Chu, Kan Xu, and Di Wu. A multi-dimension question answering network for sarcasm detection. IEEE Access, 8:135152–135161, 2020. [98] Yafeng Ren, Donghong Ji, and Han Ren. Context-augmented convolutional neural networks for twitter sarcasm detection. Neurocomputing, 308:1–7, 2018. [99] Y Alex Kolchinski and Christopher Potts. Representing social media users for sarcasm detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08470, 2018. [100] Rishabh Misra and Prahal Arora. Sarcasm detection using hybrid neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07414, 2019. [101] Avinash Kumar, Vishnu Teja Narapareddy, Veerubhotla Aditya Srikanth, Aruna Malapati, and Lalita Bhanu Murthy Neti. Sarcasm detection using multi-head attention based bidirectional lstm. Ieee Access, 8:6388–6397, 2020. [102] Yiyi Liu, Yequan Wang, Aixin Sun, Zheng Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, and Xuying Meng. A dual-channel framework for sarcasm recognition by detecting sentiment conflict. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03587, 2021. [103] Ramya Akula and Ivan Garibay. Explainable detection of sarcasm in social me dia. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pages 34–39, 2021. [104] Edoardo Savini and Cornelia Caragea. A multi-task learning approach to sarcasm detection (student abstract). In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 13907–13908, 2020. Bibliography 76 [105] Rolandos-Alexandros Potamias, Georgios Siolas, and Andreas Stafylopatis. A robust deep ensemble classifier for figurative language detection. In Interna tional Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks, pages 164–175. Springer, 2019. [106] Rahul Gupta, Jitendra Kumar, Harsh Agrawal, et al. A statistical approach for sarcasm detection using twitter data. In 2020 4th international conference on intelligent computing and control systems (ICICCS), pages 633–638. IEEE, 2020. [107] Jens Lemmens, Ben Burtenshaw, Ehsan Lotfi, Ilia Markov, and Walter Daelemans. Sarcasm detection using an ensemble approach. In proceedings of the second work shop on figurative language processing, pages 264–269, 2020. [108] Angela Fan, Thibaut Lavril, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Sainbayar Sukhbaatar. Addressing some limitations of transformers with feedback memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09402, 2020. [109] Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019. [110] Zhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel, Piyush Sharma, and Radu Soricut. Albert: A lite bert for self-supervised learning of language representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11942, 2019. [111] Himani Srivastava, Vaibhav Varshney, Surabhi Kumari, and Saurabh Srivastava. A novel hierarchical bert architecture for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 93–97, 2020. [112] Hunter Gregory, Steven Li, Pouya Mohammadi, Natalie Tarn, Rachel Draelos, and Cynthia Rudin. A transformer approach to contextual sarcasm detection in twitter. In Proceedings of the second workshop on figurative language processing, pages 270–275, 2020. [113] A Kalaivani and D Thenmozhi. Sarcasm identification and detection in conversion context using bert. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 72–76, 2020. [114] Soroush Javdan, Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli, et al. Applying transformers and aspect based sentiment analysis approaches on sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the second workshop on figurative language processing, pages 67–71, 2020. Bibliography 77 [115] Biqing Zeng, Heng Yang, Ruyang Xu, Wu Zhou, and Xuli Han. Lcf: A local context focus mechanism for aspect-based sentiment classification. Applied Sciences, 9(16): 3389, 2019. [116] Pradeesh Parameswaran, Andrew Trotman, Veronica Liesaputra, and David Ey ers. Bert’s the word: Sarcasm target detection using bert. In Proceedings of the The 19th Annual Workshop of the Australasian Language Technology Association, pages 185–191, 2021. [117] Chenwei Lou, Bin Liang, Lin Gui, Yulan He, Yixue Dang, and Ruifeng Xu. Af fective dependency graph for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 44th Inter national ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1844–1849, 2021. [118] Boaz Shmueli, Lun-Wei Ku, and Soumya Ray. Reactive supervision: A new method for collecting sarcasm data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13080, 2020. [119] Raj Kumar Gupta and Yinping Yang. Crystalnest at semeval-2017 task 4: Using sarcasm detection for enhancing sentiment classification and quantification. In Pro ceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2017), pages 626–633, 2017. [120] Hankyol Lee, Youngjae Yu, and Gunhee Kim. Augmenting data for sarcasm de tection with unlabeled conversation context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.06259, 2020. [121] Arup Baruah, Kaushik Das, Ferdous Barbhuiya, and Kuntal Dey. Context-aware sarcasm detection using bert. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 83–87, 2020. [122] Adithya Avvaru, Sanath Vobilisetty, and Radhika Mamidi. Detecting sarcasm in conversation context using transformer-based models. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 98–103, 2020. [123] Nikhil Jaiswal. Neural sarcasm detection using conversation context. In Pro ceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 77–82, 2020. [124] Xiangjue Dong, Changmao Li, and Jinho D Choi. Transformer-based context aware sarcasm detection in conversation threads from social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11424, 2020. [125] Amardeep Kumar and Vivek Anand. Transformers on sarcasm detection with context. In Proceedings of the second workshop on figurative language processing, pages 88–92, 2020. Bibliography 78 [126] Debanjan Ghosh, Avijit Vajpayee, and Smaranda Muresan. A report on the 2020 sarcasm detection shared task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05814, 2020. [127] Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084, 2019. [128] Jasabanta Patro, Srijan Bansal, and Animesh Mukherjee. A deep-learning frame work to detect sarcasm targets. In proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 6336–6342, 2019. [129] Abhijeet Dubey, Aditya Joshi, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. Deep models for con verting sarcastic utterances into their non sarcastic interpretation. In Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Manage ment of Data, pages 289–292, 2019. [130] Joseph Tepperman, David Traum, and Shrikanth Narayanan. ” yeah right”: sar casm recognition for spoken dialogue systems. In Ninth international conference on spoken language processing, 2006. [131] Byron C Wallace, Laura Kertz, Eugene Charniak, et al. Humans require con text to infer ironic intent (so computers probably do, too). In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 512–516, 2014. [132] Aditya Joshi, Prayas Jain, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark Carman. Who would have thought of that!’: A hierarchical topic model for extraction of sarcasm prevalent topics and sarcasm detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.04326, 2016. [133] Joan Plepi and Lucie Flek. Perceived and intended sarcasm detection with graph attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04001, 2021. [134] Zelin Wang, Zhijian Wu, Ruimin Wang, and Yafeng Ren. Twitter sarcasm detec tion exploiting a context-based model. In international conference on web infor mation systems engineering, pages 77–91. Springer, 2015. [135] Yasemin Altun, Ioannis Tsochantaridis, and Thomas Hofmann. Hidden markov support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on machine learning (ICML-03), pages 3–10, 2003. [136] Andrea Vanzo, Danilo Croce, and Roberto Basili. A context-based model for sentiment analysis in twitter. In Proceedings of coling 2014, the 25th international conference on computational linguistics: Technical papers, pages 2345–2354, 2014. Bibliography 79 [137] Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, L´eon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of machine learning research, 12(ARTICLE):2493–2537, 2011. [138] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. [139] Mike Schuster and Kuldip K Paliwal. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE transactions on Signal Processing, 45(11):2673–2681, 1997. [140] Rongcheng Lin, Jing Xiao, and Jianping Fan. Nextvlad: An efficient neural net work to aggregate frame-level features for large-scale video classification. In Pro ceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops, pages 0–0, 2018. [141] Jiasen Lu, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, and Stefan Lee. Vilbert: Pretraining task agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019. [142] Jiasen Lu, Vedanuj Goswami, Marcus Rohrbach, Devi Parikh, and Stefan Lee. 12-in-1: Multi-task vision and language representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10437–10446, 2020. [143] Chris Alberti, Jeffrey Ling, Michael Collins, and David Reitter. Fusion of detected objects in text for visual question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05054, 2019. [144] Silviu Oprea, Steven Wilson, and Walid Magdy. Chandler: An explainable sar castic response generator. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 339–349, 2021. [145] Sourav Das, Soumitra Ghosh, Anup Kumar Kolya, and Asif Ekbal. Unparalleled sarcasm: a framework of parallel deep lstms with cross activation functions to wards detection and generation of sarcastic statements. Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1–38, 2022. [146] Jie Ruan, Yue Wu, Xiaojun Wan, and Yuesheng Zhu. How to describe images in a more funny way? towards a modular approach to cross-modal sarcasm generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10992, 2022. Bibliography 80 [147] Fabio Petroni, Tim Rockt¨aschel, Patrick Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, Alexander H Miller, and Sebastian Riedel. Language models as knowledge bases? arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01066, 2019. [148] Joe Davison, Joshua Feldman, and Alexander M Rush. Commonsense knowledge mining from pretrained models. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 1173–1178, 2019. [149] Zhenjie Zhao, Evangelos Papalexakis, and Xiaojuan Ma. Learning physical com mon sense as knowledge graph completion via bert data augmentation and con strained tucker factorization. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 3293–3298, 2020. [150] Prajjwal Bhargava and Vincent Ng. Commonsense knowledge reasoning and gen eration with pre-trained language models: a survey. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 12317–12325, 2022. [151] Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A Smith, and Yejin Choi. Atomic: An atlas of machine commonsense for if-then reasoning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 33, pages 3027–3035, 2019. [152] Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 31, 2017. [153] Push Singh, Thomas Lin, Erik T Mueller, Grace Lim, Travell Perkins, and Wan Li Zhu. Open mind common sense: Knowledge acquisition from the general pub lic. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: Confederated International Conferences CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2002 Proceedings, pages 1223–1237. Springer, 2002. [154] Jena D Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Jeff Da, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Antoine Bosselut, and Yejin Choi. (comet-) atomic 2020: On symbolic and neu ral commonsense knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 6384–6392, 2021. [155] Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. Bibliography 81 [156] Peter West, Chandra Bhagavatula, Jack Hessel, Jena D Hwang, Liwei Jiang, Ro nan Le Bras, Ximing Lu, Sean Welleck, and Yejin Choi. Symbolic knowledge dis tillation: from general language models to commonsense models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07178, 2021. [157] Pengcheng Yang, Lei Li, Fuli Luo, Tianyu Liu, and Xu Sun. Enhancing topic-to essay generation with external commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages 2002–2012, 2019. [158] Jian Guan, Yansen Wang, and Minlie Huang. Story ending generation with in cremental encoding and commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 6473–6480, 2019. [159] Jian Guan, Fei Huang, Zhihao Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Minlie Huang. A knowledge-enhanced pretraining model for commonsense story generation. Trans actions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:93–108, 2020. [160] Pei Zhou, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Seokhwan Kim, Jay Pu jara, Xiang Ren, Yang Liu, and Dilek Hakkani-Tur. Think before you speak: Us ing self-talk to generate implicit commonsense knowledge for response generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08501, 2021. [161] Pei Zhou, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Seokhwan Kim, Jay Pu jara, Xiang Ren, Yang Liu, and Dilek Hakkani-Tur. Think before you speak: Explicitly generating implicit commonsense knowledge for response generation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1237–1252, 2022. [162] Hao Zhou, Tom Young, Minlie Huang, Haizhou Zhao, Jingfang Xu, and Xiaoyan Zhu. Commonsense knowledge aware conversation generation with graph atten tion. In IJCAI, pages 4623–4629, 2018. [163] Sixing Wu, Ying Li, Dawei Zhang, Yang Zhou, and Zhonghai Wu. Diverse and informative dialogue generation with context-specific commonsense knowl edge awareness. In Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages 5811–5820, 2020. [164] Houyu Zhang, Zhenghao Liu, Chenyan Xiong, and Zhiyuan Liu. Grounded con versation generation as guided traverses in commonsense knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02707, 2019. [165] Sixing Wu, Ying Li, Dawei Zhang, Yang Zhou, and Zhonghai Wu. Topicka: Gener ating commonsense knowledge-aware dialogue responses towards the recommended Bibliography 82 topic fact. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on Inter national Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, pages 3766–3772, 2021. [166] Tom Young, Erik Cambria, Iti Chaturvedi, Hao Zhou, Subham Biswas, and Minlie Huang. Augmenting end-to-end dialogue systems with commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 32, 2018. [167] Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. Common senseqa: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00937, 2018. [168] Tianqiao Liu, Qiang Fang, Wenbiao Ding, Hang Li, Zhongqin Wu, and Zitao Liu. Mathematical word problem generation from commonsense knowledge graph and equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.06196, 2020. [169] Aditi Chaudhary, Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Naoki Otani, and Alan W Black. What a sunny day: toward emoji sensitive irony detection. Proc. W-NUT, page 212, 2019. [170] Dushyant Singh Chauhan, Gopendra Vikram Singh, Aseem Arora, Asif Ekbal, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. An emoji-aware multitask framework for multimodal sarcasm detection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 257:109924, 2022. [171] Francesco Barbieri, Miguel Ballesteros, and Horacio Saggion. Are emojis pre dictable? arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.07285, 2017. [172] C¸ a˘grı C¸ ¨oltekin and Taraka Rama. T¨ubingen-oslo at semeval-2018 task 2: Svms perform better than rnns in emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th Inter national Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 34–38, 2018. [173] Jo¨el Coster, Reinder Gerard van Dalen, and Nathalie Adri¨enne Jacqueline Stier man. Hatching chick at semeval-2018 task 2: Multilingual emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 445–448, 2018. [174] Daphne Groot, R´emon Kruizinga, Hennie Veldthuis, Simon de Wit, and Hessel Haagsma. Pickleteam! at semeval-2018 task 2: English and spanish emoji predic tion from tweets. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 454–458, 2018. [175] Jing Chen, Dechuan Yang, Xilian Li, Wei Chen, and Tengjiao Wang. Peperomia at semeval-2018 task 2: Vector similarity based approach for emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 428–432, 2018. Bibliography 83 [176] Ga¨el Guibon, Magalie Ochs, Patrice Bellot, G Guibon, M Ochs, P Bellot, et al. From emoji usage to categorical emoji prediction. In 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLING 2018). Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Switzerland, volume 10, 2018. [177] Dunlu Peng and Huimin Zhao. Seq2emoji: A hybrid sequence generation model for short text emoji prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 214:106727, 2021. [178] Francesco Barbieri, Luis Marujo, Pradeep Karuturi, William Brendel, and Horacio Saggion. Exploring emoji usage and prediction through a temporal variation lens. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00731, 2018. [179] Francesco Barbieri, Miguel Ballesteros, Francesco Ronzano, and Horacio Saggion. Multimodal emoji prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02392, 2018. [180] Angelo Basile and Kenny W Lino. Tajjeb at semeval-2018 task 2: Traditional approaches just do the job with emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 470–476, 2018. [181] Larisa Alexa, Alina Beatrice Lorent, Daniela Gifu, and Diana Trandabat. The dabblers at semeval-2018 task 2: Multilingual emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 405–409, 2018. [182] Daniel Kopev, Atanas Atanasov, Dimitrina Zlatkova, Momchil Hardalov, Ivan Koychev, Ivelina Nikolova, and Galia Angelova. Tweety at semeval-2018 task 2: Predicting emojis using hierarchical attention neural networks and support vector machine. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 497–501, 2018. [183] Zhenduo Wang and Ted Pedersen. Umdsub at semeval-2018 task 2: Multilingual emoji prediction multi-channel convolutional neural network on subword embed ding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10274, 2018. [184] Jonathan Beaulieu and Dennis Asamoah Owusu. Umduluth-cs8761 at semeval 2018 task 2: Emojis: Too many choices? In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 400–404, 2018. [185] Nan Wang, Jin Wang, and Xuejie Zhang. Ynu-hpcc at semeval-2018 task 2: Multi ensemble bi-gru model with attention mechanism for multilingual emoji prediction. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 459–465, 2018. [186] Toshiki Tomihira, Atsushi Otsuka, Akihiro Yamashita, and Tetsuji Satoh. What does your tweet emotion mean? neural emoji prediction for sentiment analysis. Bibliography 84 In proceedings of the 20th international conference on information integration and web-based applications & services, pages 289–296, 2018. [187] Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Sixing Wu, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. Tweet emoji prediction using hierarchical model with attention. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers, pages 1337–1344, 2018. [188] Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel R Bowman. A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05426, 2017. [189] Jingjing Xu, Xu Sun, Qi Zeng, Xuancheng Ren, Xiaodong Zhang, Houfeng Wang, and Wenjie Li. Unpaired sentiment-to-sentiment translation: A cycled reinforce ment learning approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.05181, 2018. [190] Guillaume Klein, Yoon Kim, Yuntian Deng, Jean Senellart, and Alexander M Rush. Opennmt: Open-source toolkit for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02810, 2017. [191] Bill Yuchen Lin, Wangchunshu Zhou, Ming Shen, Pei Zhou, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin Choi, and Xiang Ren. Commongen: A constrained text generation challenge for generative commonsense reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03705, 2019. [192] Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D Man ning, Andrew Y Ng, and Christopher Potts. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 1631–1642, 2013. [193] Dimitrios Kotzias, Misha Denil, Nando De Freitas, and Padhraic Smyth. From group to individual labels using deep features. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 597–606, 2015. [194] Edward Loper and Steven Bird. Nltk: The natural language toolkit. arXiv preprint cs/0205028, 2002 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2058
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Md. Kamrul Hasan, Co-Supervisor, Mr. Md. Mohsinul Kabir, Department of Computer Science and Engineering(CSE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.description.abstract Sarcasm pertains to the subtle form of language that individuals use to express the op posite of what is implied. We present a novel architecture for sarcasm generation with emoji from a non-sarcastic input sentence. We divide the generation task into two sub tasks: one for generating textual sarcasm and another for collecting emojis associated with those sarcastic sentences. Two key elements of sarcasm are incorporated into the textual sarcasm generation task: valence reversal and semantic incongruity with con text, where the context may involve shared commonsense or general knowledge between the speaker and their audience. The majority of existing sarcasm generation works have focused on this textual form. However, in the real world, when written texts fall short of effectively capturing the emotional cues of spoken and face-to-face communication, people often opt for emojis to accurately express their emotions. Due to the wide range of applications of emojis, incorporating appropriate emojis to generate textual sarcastic sentences helps advance sarcasm generation. We conclude our study by evaluating the generated sarcastic sentences using human judgement. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Computer Science and Engineering(CSE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject Sarcasm Generation; Emoji; Commonsense Knowledge; Valence Reversal; Semantic Incongruity en_US
dc.title Sarcasm Generation with Emoji: A Multi-Modular Framework Incorporating Valence Reversal & Semantic Incongruity en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics