Exploring the factors affecting the movement of female pedestrians at night-time in Dhaka city

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Taslim, Faiyaz Ahmed
dc.contributor.author Labiba, Hurmetun Nesa
dc.contributor.author Momin, Nafisa Binte
dc.contributor.author Sameen, Tahseen Mohammed
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-24T08:42:02Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-24T08:42:02Z
dc.date.issued 2024-07-08
dc.identifier.citation 1. Aziz, H.M.A., Nagle, N.N., Morton, A.M. et al. Exploring the impact of walk–bike infrastructure, safety perception, and built-environment on active transportation mode choice: a random parameter model using New York City commuter data. Transportation 45, 1207–1229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116- 017-9760-8 2. Lambas, M. E. L., Sánchez, J. R., & Alonso, A. (2021). The walking health: A route choice model to analyze the street factors enhancing active mobility. Journal of Transport and Health, 22, 101133.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101133 3. Dadpour, S., Pakzad, J., & Khankeh, H. (2016). Understanding the Influence of Environment on Adults' Walking Experiences: A Meta-Synthesis Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(7), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070731 4. Seedat, M., Mackenzie, S., & Mohan, D. (2006). The phenomenology of being a female pedestrian in an African and an Asian city: A qualitative investigation. Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.09.005 5. Fillone, A. M., & Mateo-Babiano, I. (2018). Do I walk or ride the rickshaw? Examining the factors affecting first- and last-mile trip options in the historic district of Manila (Philippines). Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 237–254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26622401 6. Paydar, M. M., Kamani-Fard, A., & Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R. (2017). Perceived security of women in relation to their path choice toward sustainable neighborhood in Santiago, Chile. Cities, 60, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.002 7. Goodspeed, R., Xie, T., Dillahunt, T. R., & Lustig, J. (2019). An alternative to slow transit, drunk driving, and walking in bad weather: An exploratory study of ridesourcing mode choice and demand. Journal of Transport Geography, 79, 102481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102481 8. Bird, S; Kurowksi, W; Feldman, S; Browning, C; Lau, R; Radermacher, H; Thomas, S; Sims, J. The influence of the built environment and other factors on the physical activity of older women from different ethnic communities. J. Women Aging 2009, 21, 33–47 9. Burton, NW; Turrell, G; Oldenburg, B. Participation in recreational physical activity: Why do socioeconomic groups differ? Health Educ. Behav 2003, 30, 225–244. 10. Lambas, M. E. L., Sánchez, J. R., & Alonso, A. (2021). The walking health: A route choice model to analyze the street factors enhancing active mobility 29 | P a g e 11. Allik, M., & Kearns, A. (2017). “There goes the fear”: Feelings of safety at home and in the neighborhood: The role of personal, social, and service factors. Journal of Community Psychology, 45(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21875 12. Banerjee, A., & Maurya, A. K. (2020). Comparative Study of Pedestrians’ Movement on Different Types of Pedestrian Sidewalks in Sikkim, Gangtok. In T. V. Mathew, G. J. Joshi, N. R. Velaga, & S. Arkatkar (Eds.), Transportation Research (Vol. 45, pp. 3–17). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9042-6_1 13. Betron, M. L., McClair, T. L., Currie, S., & Banerjee, J. (2018). Expanding the agenda for addressing mistreatment in maternity care: A mapping review and gender analysis. Reproductive Health, 15(1), 143.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0584-6 14. Clark, A. F., & Scott, D. M. (2016). Barriers to Walking: An Investigation of Adults in Hamilton (Ontario, Canada). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13020179 15. Davies, M. W., & Farrington, D. P. (2020). An examination of the effects on crime of switching off street lighting. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 20(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818818861 16. Dičiūnaitė-Rauktienė, R., Gurskienė, V., Burinskienė, M., & Maliene, V. (2018). The Usage and Perception of Pedestrian Zones in Lithuanian Cities: Multiple Criteria and Comparative Analysis. Sustainability, 10(3), Article 3.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030818 17. Doyle, M., Frogner, L., Andershed, H., & Andershed, A.-K. (2016). Feelings of Safety In The Presence Of the Police, Security Guards, and Police Volunteers. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9282-x 18. Ferrer, S., Ruiz, T., & Mars, L. (2015). A qualitative study on the role of the built environment for short walking trips. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 33, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.014 19. Fotios, S., Unwin, J., & Farrall, S. (2015). Road lighting and pedestrian reassurance after dark: A review. Lighting Research & Technology, 47(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153514524587 20. Gurbuz, O., & Cheu, R. L. (2020). Survey to Explore Behavior, Intelligent Transportation Systems Needs, and Level of Service Expectations for Student Parking at a University Campus. Transportation Research Record, 2674(1), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119900169 30 | P a g e 21. Herrmann-Lunecke, M. G., Mora, R., & Sagaris, L. (2020). Persistence of walking in Chile: Lessons for urban sustainability. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1712494 22. Hung, H.-K., & Wu, C.-C. (2020). Impact of night markets on residents’ quality of life. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8316 23. Jahan, Md. I., Mazumdar, A. A. B., Hadiuzzaman, Md., Mashrur, Sk. Md., & Murshed, M. N. (2020). Analyzing Service Quality of Pedestrian Sidewalks under Mixed Traffic Condition Considering Latent Variables. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(2), 04020011.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000563 24. Kalam, A. (2014). Social Norms and Impediments of Women Development in Bangladesh. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v2i2.365 25. Leão, A. L., Lino, L., & Kanashiro, M. (2021). Women’s walking by night: The influence of street connectivity and sociodemographic composition. (p. 447). https://doi.org/10.46421/singeurb.v3i00.1122 26. Lim, H., & Wilcox, P. (2017). Crime-Reduction Effects of Open-street CCTV: Conditionality Considerations. Justice Quarterly, 34(4), 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1194449 27. Mazumder, H., & Pokharel, B. (2019). Sexual Violence on Public Transportation: A Threat to Women’s Mobility in Bangladesh. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(8), 1017–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1491487 28. Miti, M. M., Prema, A. J., Raihan, M. A., & Hossain, M. (2023). Women’s Vulnerability on Public Transport. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 036119812311657. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231165769 29. Mojanoski, C. (2015). The Citizens’ Perceptions of the Contribution of the Police for the Feeling of Safety. Security Dialogues /Безбедносни Дијалози, 2.1, 275–290. https://doi.org/10.47054/SD152.10275m 30. Tiznado-Aitken, I., Muñoz, J. C., & Hurtubia, R. (2018). The Role of Accessibility to Public Transport and Quality of Walking Environment on Urban Equity: The Case of Santiago de Chile. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(35), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118782036 31. Uddin, R., Khan, A., & Burton, N. W. (2017). Prevalence and sociodemographic patterns of physical activity among Bangladeshi young adults. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-017-0108-y 31 | P a g e 32. Uttley, J., Fotios, S., & Lovelace, R. (2020). Road lighting density and brightness linked with increased cycling rates after-dark. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0233105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233105 33. Van Soest, D., Tight, M. R., & Rogers, C. D. F. (2020). Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1575491 34. Xu, H., Tay, J., Malik, A., Afzal, S., & Ebert, D. S. (2015). Safety in view: A public safety visual analytics tool based on CCTV camera angles of view. 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2015.7225333 35. Zafri, N. M., Prithul, A. A., Baral, I., & Rahman, M. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing pedestrian vehicle crash severity in Dhaka, Bangladesh. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 27(3), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2020.1774618 36. Zhu, M., Teng, R., Wang, C., Wang, Y., He, J., & Yu, F. (2023). Key environmental factors affecting perceptions of security of night-time walking in neighbourhood streets: A discussion based on fear heat maps. Journal of Transport & Health, 32, 101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101636 37. Zumelzu, A., Estrada, M., Moya, M., & Troppa, J. (2022). Experiencing Public Spaces in Southern Chile: Analysing the Effects of the Built Environment on Walking Perceptions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912577 38. Brownson, R. C., Baker, E. A., Housemann, R. A., Brennan, L. K., & Bacak, S. J. (2001). Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1995–2003. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.91.12.1995 39. Mutesi, L., & Abbott, P. (2013). Kigali Safe City for Women and Girls. 40. Orozco-Fontalvo, M., Soto, J., Arévalo, A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2019). Women’s perceived risk of sexual harassment in a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system: The case of Barranquilla, Colombia. Journal of Transport & Health, 14, 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100598 41. Abdulla Ph.D., K., Abdelmonem, M., & Selim, G. (2016). Understanding Walkability in the Libyan Urban Space: Policies, Perceptions and Smart Design for Sustainable Tripoli. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(12) 2016, 1602. 42. Adlakha, D., & Parra, D. C. (2020). Mind the gap: Gender differences in walkability, transportation and physical activity in urban India. Journal of Transport & Health, 18, 100875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100875 32 | P a g e 43. Alshammari, T. O. (2022). Smart pedestrian network is an approach for promoting walkability: A case of Riyadh city. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 10(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i4.2975 44. Alyssa, B. Mayer. (2011). Pedestrian safety in Hillsborough County, Florida: a proposed policy approach. Florida Public Health Review, 8(1), 60-65. 45. Bansal, T., Roychowdhury, P., Rawat, P., Choubey, A. N., & Hoda, Md. N. (2022). Gender and smart city: canvassing (in)security in Delhi. GeoJournal, 87(3), 2307–2325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020- 10369-z 46. Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Walkability and Its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218 47. Batra, K. (2018). Transporting metropolitanism: Road-mapping feminist solutions to sexual violence in Delhi. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 54(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2018.1461979 48. Beaujolais, B. (2023). Empowerment Self-Defense Intervention Outcomes: A Descriptive Review of Measures. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231179727 49. Bernitsas, E., Osborne, B., Taylor, N., Zeng, F., Anatchkova, M., & Kielhorn, A. (2023). Characterizing the Impact of NMOSD on Mobility, Daily Activities, and Social Activities Through Patient Interviews (P13-5.011). Thursday, April 27, 3387. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000203233 50. Biantoro, P., Suparno, S., & Budianto, A. (2023). Law Enforcement based on Community Social Culture Approach. Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2022, 12 November 2022, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2022.2327299 51. Charafi, S. (2023). Gender mainstreaming and intersectionality in urban policies. Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies, 26(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2023.1.003.CHAR 52. Cui, Q., Gong, P., Yang, G., Zhang, S., Huang, Y., Shen, S., Wei, B., & Chen, Y. (2023a). Women-Oriented Evaluation of Perceived Safety of Walking Routes between Home and Mass Transit: A Case Study and Methodology Test in Guangzhou. Buildings, 13(3), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030715 53. Cui, Q., Gong, P., Yang, G., Zhang, S., Huang, Y., Shen, S., Wei, B., & Chen, Y. (2023b). Women-Oriented Evaluation of Perceived Safety of Walking Routes between Home and Mass Transit: A Case Study and Methodology Test in Guangzhou. Buildings, 13(3), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030715 54. Cynthia, G. (2009). Cochrane reviews - in their own words. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2(3), 207–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01037_1.x 33 | P a g e 55. Day, K. (2021). Feminist Approaches to Urban Design. In Public Space Reader(pp. 72–79). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-12 56. Domeneghini, J., Macke, J., & Sarate, J. A. R. (2022). Walkability Drivers for Sustainable Cities: a Pedestrian Behavior Survey. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 30(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.30.1.29756 57. Emad, M., Ishack, M., Ahmed, M., Osama, M., Salah, M., & Khoriba, G. (2021). Early-Anomaly Prediction in Surveillance Cameras for Security Applications. 2021 International Mobile, Intelligent, and Ubiquitous Computing Conference (MIUCC), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIUCC52538.2021.9447668 58. Fournier, N. (2021). Hybrid pedestrian and transit priority zoning policies in an urban street network: Evaluating network traffic flow impacts with analytical approximation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 152, 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.08.009 59. Golan, Y., Wilkinson, N., Henderson, J. M., & Weverka, A. (2019). Gendered walkability: Building a daytime walkability index for women. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1472 60. Goss, C. W., Van Bramer, L. D., Gliner, J. A., Porter, T. R., Roberts, I. G., & DiGuiseppi, C. (2008). Increased police patrols for preventing alcohol-impaired driving. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005242.pub2 61. Hollander, J. A. (2018). Empowerment Self-Defense. In Sexual Assault Risk Reduction and Resistance (pp. 221–244). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805389- 8.00011-6 62. Hollander, J. A., & Cunningham, J. (2020). Empowerment Self-Defense Training in a Community Population. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319897937 63. Jones, A. L. E., & Mattingly, K. (2016). Empowerment, Social Justice, and Feminist Self Defense.Affilia, 31(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109916634164 64. Jung, Y., & Wheeler, A. P. (2023). The effect of public surveillance cameras on crime clearance rates. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09477-8 65. Kaplan, J., & Chalfin, A. (2022). Ambient lighting, use of outdoor spaces and perceptions of public safety: evidence from a survey experiment. Security Journal, 35(3), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284- 021-00296-0 66. Karusala, N., & Kumar, N. (2017). Women’s Safety in Public Spaces. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3340–3351. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025532 34 | P a g e 67. Komatireddy, A. R., Reddy, K. R., Boini, B., & Kumar, Dr. G. G. (2022). Women Safety Night Patrolling Robot. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 10(6), 1279– 1284. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.44043 68. Krog, S., Nel, N. M., & David, B. B.-. (2014). Community Engagement Projects Executed According to University Policy. Participatory Educational Research, 1(2), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.14.08.1.2 69. Kumar U., A., & Adityan, B. (2020). A Mobile-based personal safety app to detect well-lit streets: for safe night-time travel. 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214128 70. Lakhotia, S., Lassarre, S., Rao, K. R., & Tiwari, G. (2020). Pedestrian accessibility and safety around bus stops in Delhi. IATSS Research, 44(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.07.001 71. Leifeld, P., Henrichsen, T., Buckton, C., Fergie, G., & Hilton, S. (2022). Belief system alignment and cross-sectoral advocacy efforts in policy debates. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(8), 1225–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1945131 72. Li, J. (2023). Analysis of Relationships between Cultural Gender Norms and Gender Gap. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 5(1), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753- 7048/5/20220477 73. Maghelal, P., & Capp, C. J. (2011). ‘Walkability: A Review of Existing Pedestrian Indices.’ URISA Journal, 23, 5–19. 74. Mahalakshmi, R., Kavitha, M., Gopi, B., & Kumar, S. M. (2023). Women Safety Night Patrolling IoT Robot. 2023 5th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT55814.2023.10060955 75. Mariana, Macedo. , L. Lotero. , A. Cardillo. , R. Menezes. , H. Barbosa. (2021). Differences in the spatial landscape of urban mobility: gender and socioeconomic perspectives.. 76. Moayedi, F., Zakaria, R., Bigah, Y., Mustafar, M., Che Puan, O., Zin, I. S., & Klufallah, M. M. A. (2013). Conceptualising the Indicators of Walkability for SustainableTransportation. Jurnal Teknologi, 65(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2151 77. Mohammadi, A., & Choobchian, P. (n.d.). Improving Walkability by Focusing on Residents’ Needs and Neighborhood’s Built Environment. In Leveraging Sustainable Infrastructure for Resilient Communities (pp. 70–81). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483879.007 35 | P a g e 78. Montolio, D., & Planells-Struse, S. (2015). When police patrols matter. The effect of police proximity on citizens’ crime risk perception. Journal of Economic Psychology, 50, 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.008 79. Muhammad Mulyadi, A., Verani Rouly Sihombing, A., Hendrawan, H., Vitriana, A., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Walkability and importance assessment of pedestrian facilities on central business district in capital city of Indonesia. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 16, 100695.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100695 80. Navarrete-Hernandez, P., Vetro, A., & Concha, P. (2021). Building safer public spaces: Exploring gender difference in the perception of safety in public space through urban design interventions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104180 81. Nichols, N., Malenfant, J., & Schwan, K. (2020). Networks and evidence-based advocacy: influencing a policy subsystem. Evidence & Policy, 16(4), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X15868720780747 82. Patil, M., Majumdar, B. B., & Sahu, P. K. (2021). Evaluating Pedestrian Crash-Prone Locations to Formulate Policy Interventions for Improved Safety and Walkability at Sidewalks and Crosswalks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(9), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211004127 83. Priya Uteng, T., Singh, Y. J., & Lam, T. (2019). Safety and daily mobilities of urban women— Methodolgies to confront the policy of “invisibility.” In Measuring TransportEquity (pp. 187–202). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814818-1.00012-3 84. RATCLIFFE, J. H., TANIGUCHI, T., GROFF, E. R., & WOOD, J. D. (2011). THE PHILADELPHIA FOOT PATROL EXPERIMENT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF POLICE PATROL EFFECTIVENESS IN VIOLENT CRIME HOTSPOTS*. Criminology, 49(3), 795–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00240.x 85. Ripat, J. D., Redmond, J. D., & Grabowecky, B. R. (2010). The Winter Walkability Project: Occupational Therapists’ Role in Promoting Citizen Engagement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2010.77.1.2 86. Rodríguez-García, M. J., & Donati, F. (2021). European Integral Urban Policies from a Gender Perspective. Gender-Sensitive Measures, Transversality and Gender Approaches. Sustainability, 13(17), 9543.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179543 87. Saez Reale, A. (2019). Walkability as a sustainable urban public policy (p. 290). 36 | P a g e 88. Saharuddin, S., Pede, A., Yunus, Y., Lasori, S. A., & Salam, S. (2022). The Role of Community Policing for Law Enforcement in Resolving Issues Outside of Court. Nurani Hukum, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v5i1.14627 89. Schaffer, E. B. (2023). Community Policing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003358657 90. Schneider, R. J. (2018). “Complete Streets” Policies and Eliminating Pedestrian Fatalities. American Journal of Public Health, 108(4), 431–433. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304317 91. Sravan Kumar, G., Kavya, D., Priyanka, G., Rahul, P., & Nagul Sharif, S. (2022). WOMEN SAFETY TOOL. YMER Digital, 21(05), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.37896/YMER21.05/13 92. Stefanidis, R.-M., & Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A. (2022a). Where to improve pedestrian streetscapes: Prioritizing and mapping street-level walkability interventions in Cape Town’s city centre. Urbani Izziv, 33(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-02-05 93. Stefanidis, R.-M., & Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A. (2022b). Where to improve pedestrian streetscapes: Prioritizing and mapping street-level walkability interventions in Cape Town’s city centre. Urbani Izziv, 33(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-02-05 94. Stummvoll, G. P. (2004). Design Against Crime in Vienna: A Feminist Approach. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 6(4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140202 95. Terraza, H., Orlando, M. B., Lakovits, C., Lopes Janik, V., & Kalashyan, A. (2020). Handbook for Gender Inclusive Urban Planning and Design. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/33197 96. Tobon, S., Mejia, D., & Gómez, S. (2020). The Deterrent Effect of Surveillance Cameras on Crime. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3560356 97. Trumpeter, N. N., & Wilson, D. K. (2014). Positive Action for Today’s Health (PATH): Sex differences in walking and perceptions of the physical and social environment. Environment and Behavior, 46(6), 745– 767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513480860 98. Veer, E., Lange, M., Haar, E., & Karremans, J. (2012). Feelings of Safety: Ironic Consequences of Police Patrolling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00967.x 99. Walsh, R. (2012). Local Policies and Practices That Support Safe Pedestrian Environments. Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.17226/22739 100. Whitzman, C., Shaw, M., Andrew, C., & Travers, K. (2009). The effectiveness of women’s safety audits. Security Journal, 22(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.1 37 | P a g e 101. Yeap, P.-F., & Liow, M. L. S. (2023). Tourist walkability and sustainable community-based tourism: conceptual framework and strategic model. International Journal of TourismCities. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-05-2022-0117 102. Yoon, J., Chun, J., & Kim, H. (2020). Investigating the Relation between Walkability and the Changes in Pedestrian Policy through Wearable Sensing. Sustainability, 12(24), 10447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410447 103. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2014. [1945]). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge. Milgram, Stanley. 1977. The Individual in a Social World: Essays and Experiments. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Co 104. Hardley, J., & Richardson, I. (2021). Mistrust of the city at night: networked connectivity and embodied perceptions of risk and safety. Australian Feminist Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2021.1934815 105. Bose, Anoushka. (2022). MAPPING THE FEAR OF TOUCH IN THE METROPOLIS OF BANGALORE. 7. 2456-3315. 106. Ewing, R., Haliyur, P., & Page, G. W. (1994). Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transportation Research Record, 1466, 53. 107. Cervero, R. (1996). Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 30(5), 361-377. 108. Holtzclaw, J. (1994). Using residential patterns and transit to decrease auto dependence and costs (Vol. 11). San Francisco: Natural Resources Defense Council. 109. Prins, R., & Van Lenthe, F. J. (2015). The hour-to-hour influence of weather conditions on walking and cycling among Dutch older adults. Age And Ageing, 44(5), 886–890. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afv103 110. De Montigny, L., Ling, R., & Zacharias, J. (2011). The effects of weather on walking rates in nine cities. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511409033 111. Shaaban, K., Muley, D., & Elnashar, D. (2017). Evaluating the effect of seasonal variations on walking behaviour in a hot weather country using logistic regression. The International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22(3), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2017.1403363 112. Kaur, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., & Colvile, R. N. (2005). Pedestrian exposure to air pollution along a major road in Central London, UK. Atmospheric Environment, 39(38), 7307–7320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.008 113. Marshall, J., Bräuer, M., & Frank, L. D. (2009). Healthy neighborhoods: walkability and air pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(11), 1752–1759. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900595 114. Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M., & Basbas, S. (2000). THE IMPACT OF PEDESTRIANIZATION SCHEMES ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AT CENTRAL AREAS. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 49, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.2495/ut000481 38 | P a g e 115. Onifade, A. O., Folasayo, B., & Babatunde, A. (2022). ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION: EFFECT ON PEDESTRIANS WHILE WALKING IN URBAN STREET. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijes.1436 116. Franěk, M., Režný, L., Šefara, D., & Cabal, J. (2018). Effect of traffic noise and relaxations sounds on pedestrian walking speed. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4), 752.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040752 117. King, E. A., Murphy, E., & McNabola, A. (2009). Reducing pedestrian exposure to environmental pollutants: A combined noise exposure and air quality analysis approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(5), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.03.005 118. Beimborn, E., Greenwald, M. J., & Jin, X. (2003). Accessibility, Connectivity, and Captivity: Impacts on transit choice. Transportation Research Record, 1835(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/1835- 01 119. Hasan, T., Siddique, A., Hadiuzzaman, M., & Musabbir, S. R. (2015). Determining the Most Suitable Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Dhaka City, Bangladesh, through a Synthesis of Measurements. Transportation Research Record, 2519(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.3141/2519-12 120. Saha, M. K., Rahman, T., Islam, M. S., & Mitra, S. K. (2013). Pedestrian behavioral pattern and preferences in different road crossing systems of Dhaka CityPedestrian. . . ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281102140_Pedestrian_Behavioral_Pat tern_and_Preferences_in_Different_Road_Crossing_Systems_of_Dhaka_CityPe destrian_Behavioral_Pattern_and_Preferences_in_Different_Road_Crossing_Sy stems_of_Dhaka_City 121. Lee, I. M., & Buchner, D. M. (2008). The importance of walking to public health. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(7), S512-S518. 122. Litman, T. (2013). SMARTER CONGESTION RELIEF IN ASIAN CITIES Win-Win Solutions to Urban Transport Problems en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2288
dc.description Supervised by Dr. Shakil Mohammad Rifaat, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering(CEE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh. This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2024 en_US
dc.description.abstract In Bangladesh, where women account for half the population, the majority have experienced sexual harassment or violence in public spaces. The urban environment, particularly after dark, poses unique challenges and concerns for women, affecting their mobility and overall sense of safety. Cultural norms and societal expectations, coupled with a lack of law enforcement presence, contribute to an environment where women feel insecure and reluctant to venture out at night. Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted on the issue of women's safety when moving around at night in developed countries as well as in developing countries like Bangladesh. However, existing research in Bangladesh focuses on specific groups such as garment workers’ safety as pedestrians during night time, leaving a gap in understanding the factors that influence the women's experiences of other sectors or cohorts. Hence, to find the influence of demographic traits of the victims, for instance, age, income, profession, car ownership, marital status, location of residence, prior experience of harassment and road infrastructure factors such as road network connectivity, lighting conditions, presence and condition of sidewalks, foot-over bridges, traffic density and other various reasons, this study will explore the perception of female pedestrian moving at night, considering diverse background from the perspective of a developing country. This paper seeks to identify the factors that discourage or encourage female pedestrian movement during night-time. A questionnaire, segmented into six categories, was designed with 47 questions by reviewing existing literature, considering the local context, and conducting a pilot survey. These encompass a range of socio-economic & demographic features, road infrastructure, surrounding environment, safety and security, incident reporting, and policy and social awareness. The survey was conducted in various locations within Dhaka city, including garments, hospitals, outside schools, government and non-government offices, and public places, collecting responses from 500 women of diverse ages and backgrounds. Independent variables were formed based on the responses provided in this survey. The dependent variable for this study is whether women commute outside during nighttime. Ordered Probit Model (Fixed Coefficient), due to the ordinal nature of the dependent variable, is employed to identify the key factors influencing the perceptions of female pedestrians when moving at night. The Ordered Probit Model will illustrate the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The analysis will reveal significant factors encouraging or discouraging women from walking at night. The model assists in finding out the most and least affected cohort of women. Additionally, independent variables with significant impacts on the perception of female pedestrians are also comprehended. The study's outcomes will empower policymakers to prioritize road infrastructure enhancements and enact legislation to enhance the safety and well-being of female pedestrians during nighttime in developing cities like Dhaka. Furthermore, safety authorities can utilize the insights from this paper to implement a strong monitoring system in areas where women experience higher rates of sexual harassment and violence. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering(CEE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh en_US
dc.title Exploring the factors affecting the movement of female pedestrians at night-time in Dhaka city en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics