- IUT Repository Home
- →
- Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEE)
- →
- Thesis
- →
- Graduate
- →
- 2024
- →
- View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Hasan, Gazi Fahmid | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-13T05:42:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-13T05:42:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. P. S. Kulkarni, A. G. Kothari, D. P. K, “Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Using Improved Backpropagation Neural Network,” Electric Machines & Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 31–44, Jan. 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/073135600268496. 2. A. Pereira-Neto, C. Unsihuay, and O. R. Saavedra, “Efficient evolutionary strategy optimisation procedure to solve the nonconvex economic dispatch problem with generator constraints,” IEE proceedings, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 653–653, Jan. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:20045287. 3. N. Kumar, K. P. Singh. Parmar, and S. Dahiya, “Optimal Solution of Combined Economic Emission Load Dispatch using Genetic Algorithm,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 15–20, Jun. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.5120/7424-0410. 4. E. Selva, M. Marsaline Beno, and J. Annrose, “A Solution for Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Problem using Hybrid Optimization Techniques,” Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, Sep. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-019-00192-z. 5. P. Singhal, Ram Naresh, J. N. Sharma, and Goutham Kumar N, “Enhanced lambda iteration algorithm for the solution of large scale economic dispatch problem,” May 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icraie.2014.6909294. 6. Shin Der Chen and Jiann Fuh Chen, “A direct Newton–Raphson economic emission dispatch,” International journal of electrical power & energy systems, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 411–417, Jun. 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-0615(02)00075-3. 7. L. G. Papageorgiou and E. S. Fraga, “A mixed integer quadratic programming formulation for the economic dispatch of generators with prohibited operating zones,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 1292–1296, Aug. 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2006.09.020. 8. Fahad Parvez Mahdi, Pandian Vasant, Vish Kallimani, Junzo Watada, P. Yeoh, and M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud, “A holistic review on optimization strategies for combined 79 economic emission dispatch problem,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 3006–3020, Jan. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.111. 9. Fahad Parvez Mahdi, Pandian Vasant, Vish Kallimani, Junzo Watada, P. Yeoh, and M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud, “A holistic review on optimization strategies for combined economic emission dispatch problem,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 3006– 3020, Jan. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.111. 10. M. Q. Wang, Hoay Beng Gooi, S. X. Chen, and S.-S. Lu, “A Mixed Integer Quadratic Programming for Dynamic Economic Dispatch With Valve Point Effect,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 11. S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, “The Whale Optimization Algorithm,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 95, pp. 51–67, May 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008. 12. S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 69, pp. 46–61, Mar. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007. 13. S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm: Theory and application,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 105, pp. 30–47, Mar. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.004. 14. S. Mirjalili, “Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 89, pp. 228–249, Nov. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006. 15. J. Talaq, “A Pareto Optimal Solution for Environmental/Economic Power Dispatch using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm,” International Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.36224/ijes.110401. 16. K. T. Chaturvedi, M. Pandit, and L. Srivastava, “Particle swarm optimization with time varying acceleration coefficients for non-convex economic power dispatch,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 249–257, Jul. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.01.010. 17. Y. A. Gherbi, H. Bouzeboudja, and F. Z. Gherbi, “The combined economic environmental 80 dispatch using new hybrid metaheuristic,” Energy, vol. 115, pp. 468–477, Nov. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.079. 18. M. Basu, “Dynamic economic emission dispatch using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 30, no. 2,pp. 140–149, Feb. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.06.009 19. W. Luo, X. Yu, and Y. Wei, “Solving combined economic and emission dispatch problems using reinforcement learning-based adaptive differential evolution algorithm,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 126, pp. 107002–107002, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107002. 20. S. Arunachalam, T. AgnesBhomila, and M. Ramesh Babu, “Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Firefly Algorithm Based Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Including Valve Point Effect,” Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 647–660, Jan. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20294-5_56. 21. W. Luo, X. Yu, and Y. Wei, “Solving combined economic and emission dispatch problems using reinforcement learning-based adaptive differential evolution algorithm,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 126, pp. 107002–107002, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107002. 22. M. H. Hassan, D. Yousri, S. Kamel, and C. Rahmann, “A modified Marine predators algorithm for solving single- and multi-objective combined economic emission dispatch problems,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 164, p. 107906, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107906. 23. H. Vennila and R. Rajesh, “Ant Lion Optimization for Solving Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Problems,” Smart innovation, systems and technologies, pp. 639–649, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7996-4_46. 24. C.K. Faseela and H. Vennila, “Combined economic and emission dispatch using whale optimisation algorithm,” International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 32–32, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijenm.2019.10019585. 25. G. Bhargava and N. K. Yadav, “Solving combined economic emission dispatch model via hybrid differential evaluation and crow search algorithm,” Evolutionary Intelligence, Feb. 81 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00357-0. 26. K. Manikandan, K. Swapna, Narendra Naik J, K. Naveen Kumar, KN Rakesh, and K. Vaishnavi, “Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm based Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Problem,” May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icaaic56838.2023.10141035. 27. R. Karthikeyan, “Combined economic emission dispatch using grasshopper optimization algorithm,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, pp. 3378–3382, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.187. 28. A. Hussien, S. Kamel, M. Ebeed, and J. Yu, “A Developed Approach to Solve Economic and Emission Dispatch Problems Based on Moth-Flame Algorithm,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 49, no. 1–2, pp. 94–107, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2021.1943063. 29. V. Hayyolalam and A. A. Pourhaji Kazem, “Black Widow Optimization Algorithm: A novel meta-heuristic approach for solving engineering optimization problems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 87, p. 103249, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103249. 30. P. Dahiya and A. K. Saha, “Frequency Regulation of Interconnected Power System Using Black Widow Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 25219–25236, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3155201. 31. B. Sadeghi, N. Shafaghatian, R. Alayi, M. El Haj Assad, F. Zishan, and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Optimization of synchronized frequency and voltage control for a distributed generation system using the Black Widow Optimization algorithm,” Clean Energy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 105–118, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkab062. 32. S. Arora and S. Singh, “An improved butterfly optimization algorithm with chaos,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1079–1088, Jan. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-16798. 33. S. Saremi and S. Mirjalili, “Integrating Chaos to Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm,” International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, pp. 655– 658, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.7763/ijcce.2013.v2.268. 34. G. Yang, S. Liu, J. Zhang, and Q. Feng, “Control and synchronization of chaotic systems by 82 an improved biogeography-based optimization algorithm,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 132–143, Dec. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0398-0. 35. S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Biogeography-based optimisation with chaos,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1077–1097, Apr. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1597-x. 36. R. B. Naik and U. Singh, “A Review on Applications of Chaotic Maps in Pseudo-Random Number Generators and Encryption,” Annals of Data Science, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-021-00364-7. 37. Uğur Güvenç, Yusuf Sönmez, S. Duman, and Nuran Yörükeren, “Combined economic and emission dispatch solution using gravitational search algorithm,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1754–1762, Dec. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.030. 38. A. Y. Abdelaziz, E. S. Ali, and S. M. Abd Elazim, “Implementation of flower pollination algorithm for solving economic load dispatch and combined economic emission dispatch problems in power systems,” Energy, vol. 101, pp. 506–518, Apr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.041 39. K. Senthil and K. Manikandan, “Economic Thermal Power Dispatch with Emission Constraint and Valve Point Effect Loading Using Improved Tabu Search Algorithm,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 6–11, Jul. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.5120/770-1080. 40. D. C. Walters and G. B. Sheble, “Genetic algorithm solution of economic dispatch with valve point loading,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1325–1332, 1993, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/59.260861. 41. M. C. B. Andrade and E. M. Banta, “Value of male remating and functional sterility in redback spiders,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 857–870, May 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2003. 42. T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Møller, Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Elsevier, 1998. Accessed: May 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=FhvmHW972mAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA307 &dq=Birkhead 83 43. M. A. Elgar and D. R. Nash, “Sexual cannibalism in the garden spider Araneus diadematus,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1511–1517, Sep. 1988, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(88)80221-5. 44. A. Jayaweera, D. N. Rathnayake, K. S. Davis, and K. L. Barry, “The risk of sexual cannibalism and its effect on male approach and mating behaviour in a praying mantid,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 110, pp. 113–119, Dec. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.09.021. 45. K. Perampaladas, J. A. Stoltz, and M. C. B. Andrade, “Mated Redback Spider Females Re Advertise Receptivity Months after Mating,” Ethology, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 589–598, Jun. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01513.x. 46. L. Forster, “The Stereotyped Behavior of Sexual Cannibalism in Latrodectus-Hasselti Thorell (Araneae, Theridiidae), the Australian Redback Spider,” Australian Journal of Zoology, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 1, 1992, doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/zo9920001. 47. M. C. B. Andrade, A. Baskaran, M. D. Biaggio, and M. Modanu, “Juvenile Experience with Male Cues Triggers Cryptic Choice Mechanisms in Adult Female Redback Spiders,” Insects, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 825, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12090825. 48. M. F. Downes, “Postembryonic Development of Latrodectus hasselti Thorell (Araneae, Theridiidae),” The Journal of Arachnology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 293–301, 1986, Accessed: May 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3705670 49. M. Modanu, L. D. X. Li, H. Said, N. Rathitharan, and M. C. B. Andrade, “Sibling cannibalism in a web-building spider: Effects of density and shared environment,” Behavioural Processes, vol. 106, pp. 12–16, Jul. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.03.011. 50. D. W. Mock and B. J. Ploger, “Parental manipulation of optimal hatch asynchrony in cattle egrets: an experimental study,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 150–160, Feb. 1987, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(87)80220-8. 51. P. Schausberger and D. Hoffmann, “Maternal manipulation of hatching asynchrony limits sibling cannibalism in the predatory mitePhytoseiulus persimilis,” Journal of Animal 84 Ecology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1109–1114, Nov. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2656.2008.01440.x. 52. J. C. PERRY and B. D. ROITBERG, “Games among cannibals: competition to cannibalize and parent-offspring conflict lead to increased sibling cannibalism,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1523–1533, Oct. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420- 9101.2005.00941.x. 53. A. Petersen, K. T. Nielsen, C. B. Christensen, and S. Toft, “The advantage of starving: success in cannibalistic encounters among wolf spiders,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1112–1117, Sep. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq119.eBooks, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91781-0.00001-6. 54. H. Lu, X. Wang, Z. Fei, and M. Qiu, “The Effects of Using Chaotic Map on Improving the Performance of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/924652. 55. S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Biogeography-based optimisation with chaos,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1077–1097, Apr. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1597-x. 56. Uğur Güvenç, Yusuf Sönmez, S. Duman, and Nuran Yörükeren, “Combined economic and emission dispatch solution using gravitational search algorithm,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1754–1762, Dec. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.030. 57. E. Mostafa, M. Abdel-Nasser, and K. Mahmoud, “Performance evaluation of metaheuristic optimization methods with mutation operators for combined economic and emission dispatch,” Dec. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/mepcon.2017.8301304. 58. M.R. AlRashidi and M.E. El-Hawary, “Emission-Economic Dispatch using a Novel Constraint Handling Particle Swarm Optimization Strategy,” Jan. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ccece.2006.277592. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2393 | |
| dc.description | Supervised by Dr. Ashik Ahmed, Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE) Islamic University of Technology (IUT) Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2024 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Economic Dispatch is a key optimization problem in power systems, aiming to distribute generation from sources to meet demand at the lowest cost while ensuring operational constraints are met. With a growing focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, Combined Economic Emission Dispatch (CEED) methods have emerged to integrate economic and environmental goals. These methods optimize power generation allocation to minimize fuel costs and emissions, striking a balance between efficiency and environmental impact, which is crucial for cleaner power generation. In earlier works, various optimization algorithms have been proposed to solve CEED, with classical methods like Linear Programming, Lambda-Iteration, and Newton Raphson having drawbacks such as converging towards local optimums and limitations in dealing with non-smooth cost functions. In recent years, nature-inspired optimization algorithms like Black Widow Optimization (BWO) have gained popularity for complex optimization problems like CEED. This research aims to improve the economic and environmental efficiency of power systems by combining chaotic mapping with the BWO algorithm. By considering a fitness function that accounts for both fuel costs and emissions, the proposed method is applied to three test systems. For test system 1, Chaotic Black Widow Optimization (CBWO) achieved the lowest best fitness value at $94,880 per hour, surpassing the second-best BWO's best of $95,505 per hour. For test system 2, CBWO recorded the lowest best fitness value at $166,210 per hour, which is comparatively better than the others. For test system 3, CBWO reached a best fitness of $42,995 per hour, significantly better than the others. The selection of comparative algorithms—BWO, Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO), Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA), and Moth-Flame Optimization (MFO)—is based on their unique characteristics and proven efficacy in complex optimization scenarios. To validate the results and ensure the robustness and reliability of the proposed method, it was necessary to compare them with previously published works. This comparison included three additional test systems, with test system 6 specifically considering all kinds of emissions, including NOx, SOx, and COx. CBWO demonstrated superior performance in these test systems as well, outperforming other algorithms, demonstrating its effectiveness. This comprehensive validation underscores CBWO's potential to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of power systems by effectively balancing economic and environmental objectives. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Department of Electrical and Elecrtonics Engineering(EEE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh | en_US |
| dc.subject | Power System Optimization, Combined Economic Emission Dispatch, Metaheuristic Algorithms, Chaotic Maps, Chaotic Black Widow Optimization, | en_US |
| dc.title | Black Widow Optimization Based Novel Approach for Enhancing Economic and Environmental Performance of Power System | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
2024 [5]