Effects of Neighborhood Characteristics on Sustainable Transportation Alternatives

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bhuiyan, M.A.Afrahim
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-23T09:05:22Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-23T09:05:22Z
dc.date.issued 2018-11-15
dc.identifier.citation Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R., Vlek, C., 2009. Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: a question of self-interest or morality?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 12, 317–324. American Planning Association, 2008. The characteristics of a great neighborhood: list of the best places in America. Press Release Report. American Planning Association, USA. Azeez, A., Supian A., 1996. A study of applicability of teleworking on selected business firm in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the Telecommute Conference, Jacksonville, USA. Aditjandra, P. T., Cao, X. J., Mulley, C., 2012. Understanding neighborhood design impact on travel behavior: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (1), 22-32. Agatz, N. A., Erera, A. L., Savelsbergh, M. W., Wang, X., 2011. Dynamic ride-sharing: a simulation study in metro Atlanta. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (9), 1450-1464. Agatz, N. A., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., Wang, X., 2012. Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: a review. European Journal for Operational Research 223 (2), 295–303. Appleyard, D., 1980. Livable streets: protected neighborhoods?. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 451, 106-117. Axhausen, K., Garling, T., 1992. Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews 12, 323–341. Barla, P., Miranda-Moreno, L. F., Lee-Gosselin, M., 2011. Urban travel CO2 emissions and land use: a case study for Quebec City. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16, 423-428. Beckx, C., Lefebvre, W., Degraeuwe, B., Vanhulsel, M., Kochan, B., Bellemans, T., Dhondt, S., Int Panis, L., 2013. Assessing the environmental impact associated with different trip purposes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 18, 110-116. Bento, A. M., Hughes, J. E., Kaffine, D., 2013. Carpooling and driver responses to fuel price changes: evidence from traffic flow in Los Angeles. Urban Economics 77, 41–56. Beckman, M. J., 1965. On optimal tolls for highways, tunnels and bridges. Transportation Research Board 00816920, 331-341. Belz, N., Lee, B., 2012. Composition of vehicle occupancy for journey-to-work trips: evidence of ridesharing from the 2009 national household travel survey Vermont add-on sample. Transportation Research Records: 2322 (1), 1-9. 136 Bonsall, P., 1981. Carsharing in the United Kingdom. Transport Economics Policy 15, 35-44. Bruntland, G. H., 1987. Report for the world commission on environment and development. Assessment Report. Bruntland Commission Report, WCED. Brundell-Freij, K., Ericsson, E., 2005. Influence of street characteristics, driver category and car performance on urban traffic patterns. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10, 213-229. Bergstad, C. J., Gamble, A., Hangman, O., Polk, M., Garling, T., Olsson, L. E., 2011. Affective symbolic and instrumental independence psychological motives mediating effects of sociodemographic variables on daily car use. Transportation Geography 19, 33-38. Buliung, R. N., Soltys, K., Bui, R., Habel, C., Lanyon, R., 2010. Catching a ride on the information super-highway: toward an understanding of internet-based carpool formation and use. Transportation Research Board 37 (6), 849–873. Buliung, R. N., Bui, R., Lanyon, R., 2012. When the internet is not enough: toward an understanding of carpool services for service workers. Transportation Research Board 39 (5), 877-893. Cervero, R., 1986. Suburban gridlock. Research Report. Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, USA. Cervero, R., Carolyn, R., 1996. Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3 (3), 127-141. Cervero, R., 1989. America’s Suburban Centers. Research Report. Department of Transport, USA. Cervero, R., 1990. Transit pricing research: a review and synthesis. Journal of Transportation 17 (2), 117–139. Chakour, V., Eluru, N., 2013. Analyzing commuter train user behavior: a decision framework for access mode and station choice. Journal of Transportation 41 (1), 211-228. Chapman, A. J., Sheehy, N. P., Heywood, S., Dooley, B., Collins, S. C., 1995. The organizational implications of teleworking. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 10, 229-248. CARTAS, 2013. Changing travel behavior in the Calgary region. Survey Report. Travel Behaviour Report Series: CARTAS, Canada. Cheng, Y., Chang, Y., Lu, I. J., 2015. Urban transportation energy and carbon dioxide emission reduction strategies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 12, 121-132. 137 Chung, C. L., Jeng, J. Y., Lee, Z. Y., Lee, Shian, J., 2015. Study of carpool user behaviors and route characteristics in Taiwan. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology 39 (6), 1105-1109. Chowdhury, S., Cede,r A., 2016. Users’ willingness to ride an integrated public transport service: a literature review. Transport Policy 48, 183-195. Charles, K. K., Kline, P., 2006. Relational costs and the production of social capital: evidence from carpooling. The Economic Journal 116 (511), 581–604. Ciari, F., 2012. Why do people carpool? Results from a Swiss survey. Journal of Swiss Transport Research Conference 4 (6), 29-37. Clavel, R., Legrand, P., 2009. Dynamic carpooling: preliminary study before experimentation. Research Report. Centre d’Etudes Sur Lrs Reseaux, Les Transports, l’Urbanisme et Les Constructions Publiques, Lyon, France. Collia, D. V., Sharp, J., Giesbrecht, L., 2003. The 2001 national household survey: a look into the travel pattern of older Americans. Safety Research 34, 461-470. Collura, J., 1994. Evaluating ride-sharing programs: Massachusetts’ experience. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 120 (1), 28–47. Correia, G., Viegas, J. M., 2011. Carpooling and carpool clubs: clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a stated preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45 (2), 81-90. Costanza, R., Patten, B.C., 1995. Defining and predicting sustainability. Journal of Ecological Economics 15, 193–196. Cox, W., 2009. Executive summary: improving quality of life through telecommuting. Research Report. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Washington, USA. Crepeau, R., 1998. Does neighborhood design influence travel? : A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transportation Research 3, 225-238. Davidson, M., 1998. The Principles of smart development: neighborhood street design. Technical Report. Planning Advisory Service, American Planning Association and Oregon Transportation and Growth Management Program, Chicago, USA. Davis, S. C., Diegel, S. W., Boundy, R. G., 2013. Transportation Energy. Data Book. In: Department of Transportation, USA. Deakin, E., Frick, K. T., Shively, K., 2012. Dynamic ridesharing. Research Report. University of California Transportation Center, University of California, USA. 138 De Graaff, T., Rietveld P., 2007. Substitution between working at home and out-of-home: the role of ICT and commuting costs. Journal of Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41, 142–160. De Graaff, T., Rietveld, P., 2004. ICT and substitution between out-of-home and at home work: the importance of timing. Journal of Environment and Planning 36, 879–896. De Graaff, T., 2004. On the substitution between telework and travel: a review and application. Research Memorandum 2004-16. University Of Amsterdam, Netherlands. DeLoach, S., Tiemann, T., 2010. Not driving alone: commuting in the twenty-first century. Research Report. Department of Economics, Elon University, North Carolina, USA. Delhomme, P., Gheorghiu, A., 2015. Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: which factors contribute the most to carpooling?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 42, 1–15. DOT, 1986. National travel survey. Survey Report. Department of Transport, HMSO, London, UK. DOT, 2015. About transportation and climate Change: transportation's role in climate change: overview. Technical Report. Transportation and Climate Change Clearinghouse, Department of Transport, HMSO, London, UK. Di Martino, V., Wirth, L., 1990. Telework: a new way of working and living. International Labor Review 129 (5), 529-554. Dissanayake, D., 2008. Sustainable urban policies for developing countries by integrating center based telecommuting with transit and road pricing case study of Bangkok, Thailand metropolitan region. Transportation Research Record 2067, 137-145. Duecker, K. J., Bair, B. O., Levin, I. P., 1977. Ridesharing: psychological factors. Journal of Transportation Engineering 103 (6), 685-692. Dumbaugh, E., 2005. Safe streets, livable streets. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (3), 283-298. Ellis, M., Wright, R., Parks, V., 2004. Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and work. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (3), 620-637. European Environment Agency, 2010. Occupancy rates of passenger vehicles. Assessment Report. European Environment: IND-117, European Union, Netherlands. EU, 2012. European Union transport in figures. Statistical Pocketbook. European Union, Luxemburg. 139 EU, 2007. Green Paper: towards a new culture for urban mobility. Assessment Report. European Union, Luxembourg. European Commission, 2011. Accompanying the white paper roadmap to a single European transport area towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. Assessment Report. European Commission, Brussels. Ewing, R., 2003. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion 18 (1), 47-57. Ewing, R., Cervero, R., 2001. Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Research Record 1780, 87-114. Ferdous, N., Pinjari, A. R., Bhat, C. R., Pendyaia, R. M., 2010. A comprehensive analysis of household transportation expenditures relative to other goods and service: an application of United States consumer expenditure data. Journal of Transportation 37 (3), 363-390. Farber, S., Bartholomew, K., Li, X., Paez, A., Habib, K. M. N., 2014. Assessing social equity in distance-based transit fares using a model of travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 67, 291-303. Ferguson, F., 1995. Demographics of carpooling. Transportation Research Record 1496, 142–150. Filion, P., Hammond, k., 2003. Neighborhood land use and performance: the evaluation of neighborhood morphology over 20th century. Journal of Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (2), 271-296. Florida, R., 2002. The rise of the creative class. In: Basic Books Limited, New York, USA. Frank, L. D., Engelke, P., Schmid, T., 2003. Health and community design: the impact of the built environment on physical activity. Press Note. Island Press, Washington, USA. Friman, M., Edvardsson, B., Garling, T., 2001. Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 8, 95-104. Garrison, W., 2007. Increasing the flexibility of legacy systems. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research 2 (2), 40-56. Garling, T., Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., Johansson-Stenman, O., Kitamura, R., 2002. A conceptual analysis of the impact of travel demand management on private car use. Journal of Transport Policy 9, 59–70. Gardner, B., Abraham, C., 2008. Psychological correlates of car use: a meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Transport Policy and Behaviour 11 (4), 300–311. 140 Gao, S., Johnston, R. A., 2009. Public versus private mobility for low-income households: transit improvements versus increased car ownership in the Sacramento, California, region. Transportation Research Board 2125, 9–15. Garling, T., Steg, L., 2007. Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: problems, causes, and solutions. Journal of Elsevier: Oxford 187–204. Gilbert, R., Tanguay, H., 2000. Sustainable transportation performance indicators project: brief review of some relevant worldwide activity and development of an initial long list of indicators. Research Report. Centre for Sustainable Transportation, Toronto, Canada. Giuliano, G., 1992. Transportation demand management promise or panacea. Journal of American Planning Association 58 (3), 327–335. Giuliano, G., Levine, D., Teal, R., 1990. Impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on carpooling behavior. Journal of Transportation 17 (2), 159–77. Greene, D. L., Hillsman, E. L., Wolfe, A. K., 1994. Energy, emissions, and social consequences of telecommuting: series of the energy efficiency in the USA economy. National Report. Department of Energy, USA. Goodwin, P. B., 1996. Simple arithmetic. Journal of Transport Policy 3, 79–80. Handy, S. L., Mokhtarian, P. L., 1995. Planning for telecommuting: measurement and policy. Journal of American Planning Association 61 (1), 99-111. Handy, S. L., Mokhtarian, P. L., 1996. The future of telecommuting. Journal of Futures 28 (3), 227-240. Harpaz, I., 2002. Advantages and disadvantages of telecommuting for the individual, organization, and society. Journal of Work Study 5I (2/3), 74-80. Harris, C. B., Webber, M. E., 2012. A temporal assessment of vehicle use patterns and their impact on the provision of vehicle-to-grid services. Journal of Environmental Research 7, 034033. Hensher, D. A., 1985. An econometric model of vehicle use in the household sector. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 19, 303–313. Horowitz, A. D., Sheth, J. N., 1979. Ride sharing to work: an attitudinal analysis. Transportation Research Record 637, 1–8. Hunton, J., Norman, C., 2010. The impact of alternative telework arrangements or organizational comment: insights from a longitudinal field experiment. Journal of Information System 24 (1), 67-90. 141 International Energy Agency, 2005. Saving oil in a hurry: measures for rapid demand restraint in transport. Assessment Report. International Energy Agency and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change: mitigation of climate change. Assessment Report. 5th Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK. IPCC, 2007. IPCC 4th assessment report: mitigation of climate change. Assessment Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK. Jakobson, C., Fujii, S., Garling, T., 2002. Effects of economic disincentives on private car use. Journal of Transportation 29, 349–370. Jacobson, S. H., King, D. M., 2009. Fuel saving and ridesharing in the US: motivations, limitations, and opportunities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 14, 14–21, 134. James, P., 2004. Is teleworking sustainable? An analysis of its economic, environmental and social impacts. Assessment Report. European Communities, Peterborough, UK. James, P., Magee, L., Scerri, A., Manfred B. S., 2015. Urban sustainability in theory and practice: circle of sustainability. In: Routledge, UK. Jeon, C. M., Amekudzi, 2005. Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 31–50. Jia, S., Mao, B., Liu, S., Sun, Q., 2010. Calculation and analysis of transportation energy consumption level in China. Journal of Transportation Systems and Engineering and Information Technology 10 (1), 22-27. Jia, Z., Wang, D. Z. W., Cai, X., 2016. Traffic management for household travels in congested morning commute. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 91, 173–189. Jou, R., Chen, T., 2014. Factors affecting public transportation, car, and motorcycle usage. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 61, 186-198. Kaufman, S., 2002. Why people (don’t) carpool and change for the better: a social capital framework for investigating environmental behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference of Sustainable Campuses, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia. Kennedy, C., Miller, E., Shalaby, A., Maclean, H., Coleman, J., 2005. The four pillars of sustainable urban transportation. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal 25, 393-414. 142 Kenworthy, J. R., 2003. Transport energy use and greenhouse emissions in urban passenger transport systems: a study of 84 global cities. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the Regional Government Network for Sustainable Development, Notre Dame University, Fremantle, Western Australia. Kitamura, R., Fujii, S., Pas, E. I., 1997. Time-use data, analysis, and modeling: toward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies. Journal of Transport Policy 4, 225–235. Khattak, A. J., Rodriguez, D., 2006. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in the USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (6), 481–500. Koenig, B. E., Henderson, D. K., Mokhtarian, P. L., 1996. The travel and emissions impacts of telecommuting for the state of California telecommuting pilot project. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies: 4 (1), 13-32. Kong, L., 2010. Making sustainable creative/cultural space in Shanghai and Singapore. Journal of Geographical Review 99 (1), 1–22. Kulash, W., 1990. Traditional neighborhood development: will the traffic work?. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Pedestrian Conference, Bellevue, Western Australia. Lau, J., Hung, W. T., Cheung, C. S., Yuen, D., 2008. Contributions of roadside vehicle emissions to general air quality in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport Environment 13 (1), 19–26. LeBeau, P., 2012. Consumer attitudes towards battery electric vehicles: a large-scale survey. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles 5 (1), 28-43. Litman, T., 1998. Measuring transportation: traffic, mobility and accessibility. Institute of Transportation Engineering Journal 73 (10), 28-32. Litman, T., 2009. Sustainable transportation and TDM. Online TDM Encyclopedia. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, British Columbia, Canada. Lefevre, B., Eisenbeirg, K., Yadav, N., Enriquez, A., 2016 A. LEDS in practice: fight poverty. Research Report. Low Emission Development Strategies Global Partnership Program, LEDS GP. Lefevre, B., Eisenbeirg, K., Yadav, N., Enriquez, A., 2016 B. LEDS in practice: breathe clean. Research Report. Low Emission Development Strategies Global Partnership Program, LEDS GP. LCCMT, 1962. London traffic survey. Survey Report. Department of Transport, HMSO, London, UK. 143 Lucas, K., 2009. Actual and perceived car dependence: likely implications of enforced reductions in car use for livelihoods, lifestyles, and well-being. Transportation Research Board 2118, 8–15. Magee, L., Scerri, A., James, P.; Thom, J. A., Padgham, L., Hickmott, S., Deng, H., Cahill F., 2013. Reframing social sustainability reporting: towards an engaged approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability 15 (1), 243-245. Malodia, S., Singla, H., 2016. A study of carpooling behavior using a state performance web survey in selected cities of India. Transportation Planning and Technology 39 (5), 538-550. Marshal, W. E., Garrick, N. W., 2010. The effect of street network design on walking and biking. Official Report. 89th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA. Margolin, J., Misch, M. R., Stahr, M., 1978. Incentives and disincentives of ridesharing. Transportation Research Record 673, 7-15. Mannering, F. L., 1983. An econometric analysis of vehicle use in multi-vehicle households. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 17, 183–189. Mayer, H., 1999. Air pollution in cities. Journal of Atmospheric Environment 33, 24–25, 4029–4037. McKenzie, B., 2014. Modes less traveled: Bicycling and walking to work in the United States. State Report, USA Government. USA. Meyer, M., 1999. Demand management as an element of transportation policy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 (7), 575–599. Meyer, M., Miller, E., 2001. Urban transportation planning: a decision-oriented approach. In: McGraw-Hill Incorporation, New York, USA. Minett, P., Pearce, J., 2011. Estimating the energy consumption impact of casual carpooling. Journal of Energies 4 (1), 126–139. Minett, P., 2013. Flexible carpooling to transit stations. Final Project Report. Transit IDEA Project-61, Trip Convergence Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand. Mitropoulos, L. K., Prevedouros, P. D., 2014. Multi-criterion sustainability assessment in transportation private cars, car sharing, and transit buses. Transportation Research Board 2403, 52–61. Mokhtarian, P. L., 1990. A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 24, 231–242. 144 Mokhtarian, P. L., Handy, S. L., Salomon, I., 1995. Methodological issues in the estimation of the travel, energy, and air-quality impacts of telecommuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 29 (4), 283-302. Mokyr, J., 1999. The British industrial revolution: an economic perspective. Press Release. Westview Press, Boulder, USA. Montgomery, D. C., Runger, G. C., 2003. Applied statistics and probability for engineers. In: John Willy and Sons Company Limited, New York, USA. Morency, C., 2007. The ambivalence of ridesharing. Journal of Transportation 34 (2), 239-253. Moudon, A., Untermann, R., 1987. Grids revisited: public streets for public use. In: Moudon, A. V. (Ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, UK. Naoum-Sawaya, J., Cogill, R., Ghaddar, B., Sajja, S., Shorten, R., Taheri, N., Tommasi, P., Verago, R., Wirth, F., 2015. Stochastic optimization approach for the car placement problem in ridesharing systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 80, 173–184. Nelson, P., Safirova, E., Walls, M., 2007. Telecommuting and environmental policy: lessons from the e-commute program. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 12 (3), 195-207. Nilles, J. M., 1988. Traffic reduction by telecommuting: a status review and selected bibliography. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 22, 301–317. Nolan, A., 2010. A dynamic ownership of household car ownership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44, 446-455. Nurrdden, A., Rahman, R. A., Ismail, A., 2007. Effect of transport policy on model shift from private car to public transport in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences 7 (7), 1014-1018. OECD, 2002. OECD: environmental outlook. Assessment Report. OECD, Paris, France. OECD, 2001. Environmental outlook. Assessment Report. OECD, Paris, France. OICA, 2015a. OICA 2005-2014 sales statistics: world motor vehicle sales. Assessment Report. International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers, Paris, France. O'Sullivan, A., 1993. Urban economics. In: Irwin Limited, Boston, USA. Ouyang, Y., Shankar, V., Yamamoto, T., 2002. Modeling the simultaneity in injury causation in multi-vehicle collisions. Transportation Research Record 1784, 143-152. Ozanne, L., Mollenkopf, D., 1999. Understanding consumer intentions to carpool: a test of alternative models. Annual Assessment Report. Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy, Australia. 145 Park, H.; Gebeloff, R., 2011. Car-pooling declines as driving becomes cheaper. Press Report. The New York Times, USA. Pasha, M., Rifaat, S. M., Tay, R., De Barros, A., 2016 (A). Urban design and planning influences on the share of trips taken by cycling. Journal of Urban Design 21 (4), 471-480. Pasha, M., Rifaat, S. M., Tay, R., De Barros, A., 2016 (B). Effects of street pattern, traffic, road infrastructure, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics on public transit ridership. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20 (3), 1017-1022. Pasha, M., 2016. Effects of neighborhood characteristics on sustainable transportation modes. Master of Science in Civil Engineering Thesis, Islamic University of Technology, Bangladesh. Pendyala, R. M., Kitamura, R., Chen, C., Pas, E. I., 1997. An activity-based microsimulation analysis of transportation control measures. Journal of Transport Policy 4, 183–192. Peincherry, V., 2009. A framework for evaluating regional impacts of broadband internet access: application to telecommuting behavior. Journal of Decision Economics 45, 28-36. Pigou, A. C., 1920. The Economics of welfare. In: MacMillian and Company Limited, London, UK. Pratt, J. H., 1984. Home teleworking: a study of its pioneers. Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change 25 (1), 7-14. Poudenx, P., 2008. The effect of transportation policies on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission from urban passenger transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42 (6), 901-909. Portney, K. E., 2001. Taking sustainable cities seriously: a comparative analysis of twenty-three U.S. Cities. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Meetings of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California. Ranasinghe, W.C., Hemakumara, G. P. T. S., 2018. Spatial modelling of the householders' perception and assessment of the potentiality to improve the urban green coverage in residential areas: a case study from Issadeen Town Matara, Sri Lanka. Ruhuna. Journal of Science 9 (1), 52-61. Richard, R., 2006. Eco cities: building cities in balance with nature. In: New Society Publishers, UK. Richardson, A. J., Young W., 1982. The spatial structure of carpool formation. In: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA. Rifaat, S. M., Chin, H.C., 2007. Accident severity analysis using ordered probit model. Journal of Advanced Transportation 41 (1), 91-114. 146 Roy, S., 2016. The impact of genders, personality and previous use on attitude towards the sharing economy and future use of the services. Master of Business Administration Thesis, Library of Fresnostate, California State University, USA. Rose, G., Ampt, E., 2001. Travel blending: An Australian travel awareness initiative. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 6, 95–110. Rye, T., 2002. Travel plans: do they work?. Journal of Transport Policy 9, 287–298. Saalman, H., 1971. Haussmann: Paris transformed. In: Braziller, G. (Ed.), Studio Vista, New York, USA. Salomon, I., 1986. Telecommunications and travel relationships: a review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 20 (3), 223–238. Salomon, I., 2000. Can telecommunication help solve transportation problems?: Handbook of Transport Modelling. In: Hensher, D. A. (Ed.), Elsevier Science Limited, Netherlands. Schafer, A., 1998. The global demand for motorized mobility. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice 32 (6), 455-477. Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P. L., 1998. Does dissonance between desired and current residential neighborhood type affect individual travel behavior?: San Francesco Bay Area. Empirical Assessment Report. Department of Transport, USA. Simandan, D., 2016. Proximity, subjectivity, and space: rethinking distance in human geography. Geoforum 75, 249-252. Shoup, D., 1997. Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: eight case studies. Journal of Transport Policy 4 (4), 201–216. Shoup, D., 2006. Cruising for parking. Journal of Transport Policy 13 (6), 479–486. Shoup, D., 2011. Free parking or free markets. ACCESS Magazine 1 (38), 28–35. Shmelev, S. E., Shmeleva, I. A., 2009. Sustainable cities: problems of integrated interdisciplinary research. International Journal of Sustainable Development 12 (1), 4 – 23. Social Exclusion Unit, 2010. Making the connections: final report on transport and social exclusion. Assessment Report. Office of the Prime Minister, London, UK. Southworth, M., Parthasarathy, B., 1996. The suburban public realm I: its emergence, growth, and transformation in the American metropolis. Journal of Urban Design 1 (3), 245-263. Southworth, M., Ben-Joseph, E., 1995. Streets standards and the shaping of suburbia. Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (1), 65-81. 147 Southworth, M., 1997. Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neo-traditional communities at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1), 28-44. Southworth, M., Owens, P., 1993. The evolving metropolis: studies of community, neighborhood, and street form at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (3), 271-287. Steininger, K., Vogl, C., Zettl, R., 1996. Car-sharing organizations: the size of the market segment and revealed change in mobility behavior. Journal of Transportation Policy 3 (4), 177–185. Steyaert, J., De Haan, J., 2001. Geleidelijk Digitaal, een nuchtere kijk op de sociale gevolgen van ICT. Assessment Report. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag, Netherlands. Steg, L., 2005. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and effective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 29 (2–3), 147–162. Steg, L., Gifford, R., 2005. Sustainable transport and quality of life. Transport Geography 13, 24-33. Stradling, S., 2007. Determinants of car dependence: comprehensive strategic management. In: Stag, L. (Ed.), Emerald Publishing Limited, UK. Sundo, M., Fujii, S., 2005. The effects of a compressed working week on commuters’ daily activity patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (10), 835–848. Sustainable Communities Task Force Report, 1997. Appendix A: definitions and principles of sustainable communities. Task Force Report. Sustainable Community’s Task Force, USA Government, USA. Taylor, B., 2006. Putting a price on mobility: cars and contradictions in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (3), 279–284. TDM encyclopedia, 2010. Ridesharing: carpooling and vanpooling. Assessment Report. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, British Columbia, Canada. Teal, R. F., 1987. Carpooling: who, how and why. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 21 (3), 203-214. Teal, R., Giuliano, G., Levine, D., 1989. Impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on carpooling behavior. Journal of Transportation 17 (2), 159–77. Tennoy, A., 2012. How and why planners make plans which, if implemented, cause growth in traffic volumes. Research Report. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway. 148 Texas Transportation Institute, 2009. Urban mobility report. Assessment Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas, USA. Tezcan, H. O., 2015. Potential of carpooling among unfamiliar users: case of undergraduate students at Istanbul Technical University. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 11, 733. Thakuriah, P., Liao, Y., 2005. An analysis of variations in vehicle-ownership expenditures. Transportation Research Record: 1926, 1-9. Thakuriah, P., Liao, Y., 2006. Transportation expenditures and ability to pay evidence from consumer expenditure survey. Transportation Research Record 1985, 257-265 Tischer, M., Dobson, R., 1979. An empirical analysis of behavioral intentions of single-occupant auto drivers to shift to high occupancy vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 13 (3), 143–158. Tonnesen, A., 2015. Urban entrepreneurialism and car-use reduction. Planning Theory and Practice 16 (2), 206–225. Transport Canada, 2008. Key Issues in Transportation. Assessment Report. Transport Canada, Canada. Tsao, H. J., Lin D. J., 1999. Spatial and temporal factors in estimating the potential of ride-sharing for demand reduction. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, USA. Turnbull, K., Stokes, R.W., Henk, R.H., 1991. Current practices in evaluating freeway HOV facilities. Transportation Research Record 1299, 63-73. Tyrinopoulos, Y., Antoniou, C., 2013. Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility. European Transport Research Review 5, 27–39. USEPA, 2018. National multipollutant emissions comparison by source sector in 2002. Assessment Report. United States Environmental Protection Agency, USA. USEPA, 2012. Strategies for managing impacts from automobiles. State Report. Region 10, United States Environment Protection Agency, USA. UNEP, 2016. Air pollution: world's worst environmental health risk. Assessment Report. United Nations Environment Programme. US Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, 2010. Helping to build a safe and sustainable transportation infrastructure. Technical Report. Department of Transport, USA. 149 US Department of Commerce Census Bureau, 2014. Commuting characteristics: 2009–2013: American community survey 5-year estimates. Technical report. Department of Commerce Census Bureau, USA. US Department of Transportation, 2014. National Household Travel Survey. Survey Report. Department of Transportation, US Federal Highway Administration, USA. US Bureau of Transportation Services, 2006. Transportation implications of telecommuting. Assessment Report. US Bureau of Transportation Services, USA. UK National Archive, 2008. What is a sustainable community?. State Report. National Archive, HMSO, UK. Untermann, R., 1987. Changing design standards for streets and roads: public streets for public use. In: Moudon, A. V. (Ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, UK. Vanoutrive, T. E., Van de Vijver, L., Van Malderen, B., Jourquin, I., Thomas, A., Vershetsel, F., Witlox, 2012. What determines carpooling to workplaces in Belgium: location, organization or promotion?. Transport Geography 22, 77-86. Van Wissen, L., Golob, T. F., 1992. A dynamic model of car fuel-type choice and mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 26: 77–96. Van Wee, B., 2007. Environmental effects of urban traffic, threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: problems, causes, and solution. In: Ga¨rling, T., Steg, L. (Eds.), Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Vilhelmson, B., 1999. Daily mobility and the use of time for different activities: the case of Sweden. Geo Journal 48, 177–185. Vijayann, M., 2014. How are social enterprises helping address road safety and transportation challenges in India?. State Report. Ministry of Transportation, India. Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., Mannering, F. L., 2010. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. In: Chapman and Hall Corporation, USA. Washbrook, K., Haider, W.; Jaccard, M., 2006. Estimating commuter mode choice: a discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Journal of Transportation 33 (6), 621–639. Wolfe, C., 1987. Streets regulating neighborhoods form: a selective history; public streets for public use. In: Moudon, A. V. (Ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, UK. Wootton, J., 1999. Replacing the private car. Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal 19 (2), 157-175. Wootton, H. J., Pick, G. W., 1997. A model for trips generated by households. Transport Economics and Policy 1, 137- 153. 150 World Energy Council, 2007. Transport technologies and policy scenarios. Assessment Report. World Energy Council, USA. WHO, 2010. Health effects of transport. Assessment Report. World Health Organization. Yap, C. S., Tng, H., 1990. Telecommuting management: a comprehensive overview. Human System Management 14 (3), 227-235. Zhou, J., 2012. Sustainable commute in a car dominant city: factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transport Research part A: Policy and Practice 46, 1013-1029. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/346
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Shakil Mohammad Rifaat en_US
dc.description.abstract Traffic demand is increasing worldwide with booming economic growth. As a result, severe carbon emissions from transportation sector are highly contributing to the climate change. With the rapid increase of urban vehicles, the limited road traffic resources are becoming more and more strained. Traffic congestion and traffic safety have also become vital restrictive factors for overall development. Therefore, it is mandatory to reduce traffic congestion. To reduce emissions and continue economic growth, a sustainable and efficient transport system is indispensable. Sustainable urban transportation involves firming many features like efficiency, safety, security, convenience, low carbon, comfort, environment-friendliness etc. The characteristics of sustainable transportation are seen in several modes and alternatives such as public transit, walking, bicycling, ridesharing/carpool, teleworking/home-based office, reduction of personalized vehicles/auto ownership etc. The objective of this study is to identify the effects of different neighborhood characteristics like socioeconomic, road infrastructure, demographic and street patterns on sustainable transportation alternatives in community areas using 2011 census data and road infrastructure data of Calgary city. To develop relationships between neighborhood characteristics and sustainable transportation alternatives, linear regression model has been used. Public transit ridership, bicycling and walking have already been considered as sustainable transportation modes. However, carpool, working at home/teleworking, reduction of private vehicle usage are other alternatives which could be considered to promote sustainability. For each case, a linear regression model has been developed. In the models, sustainable alternatives were considered as the dependent variables. In the models different neighborhood characteristics has been considered as independent variables. Three different analyses have been done afterwards. The result of this study suggests that the effects of different street patterns are not identical on different alternative choices. More specifically, in reference to the irregular street pattern, other street patterns decreases the tendency of teleworking; on the contrary, the curvilinear street pattern is useful for private vehicles usage reduction. Except irregular street pattern, carpool remains indifferent for other street patterns. These findings would be helpful for the policymakers to develop new communities to promote sustainability. Moreover, different socioeconomic, demographic, land use factors such as type of roads, type and area of communities, gender, age, race, income, educational qualifications, dwelling conditions etc. play an important role in selecting different sustainable alternatives. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.title Effects of Neighborhood Characteristics on Sustainable Transportation Alternatives en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics