A Comparative Study on Engineering Student's Performance Between Single Gender Classroom and Coded in Islamic University of Technology(IUT)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Iron- Baba, Faruq Bashir
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-25T07:16:46Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-25T07:16:46Z
dc.date.issued 2018-11-15
dc.identifier.citation Ahmed, M. (2010). Technical and vocational education and training-curricula reform demand in Bangladesh: qualification requirements, qualification deficits and reform perspectives. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., . . . Stoica, I. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50-58. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. Bortz, J., & Weber, R. (2005). {S} tatistik für {H} uman-und {S} ozialwissenschaftler:{M} it 242 {T} abellen. Chouinard, R., Vezeau, C., & Bouffard, T. (2008). Coeducational or single‐sex school: does it make a difference on high school girls’ academic motivation? Educational Studies, 34(2), 129-144. Crombie, G., Abarbanel, T., & Trinneer, A. (2002). All-female classes in high school computer science: Positive effects in three years of data. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(4), 385- 409. De Winter, J. C. (2013). Using the Student's t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(10). Diehl, J. M., & Staufenbiel, T. (2001). Statistik mit SPSS Version 10.0: Klotz. Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Ramirez, J. J., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Hurtado, S. (2014). The American freshman: National norms fall 2014. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Fleming, R. M., & Zucker, E. L. (2002). Influences of type of high school attended and current relationship status on life goal ratings of college women. Psychological reports, 91(3), 989-993. Graebner, W. (2006). " Back-fire to lust": G. Stanley Hall, sex-segregated schooling, and the engine of sublimation. History of psychology, 9(3), 236. Gwarjiko, U. (2015). Gender Streaming and Secondary School Female Students’ Performance in English Language in Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 4(6). Haolader, F. (2010). Technical and Vocational Education and Training− Curricula Reform Demand in Bangladesh. Qualification Requirements, Qualification Deficits and Reform Perspectives. PhD Thesis, Stuttgart University, Germany. Submitted in July. Hoffman, B. H., Badgett, B. A., & Parker, R. P. (2008). The effect of single-sex instruction in a large, urban, at-risk high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 15-36. Jackson, C., & Bisset, M. (2005). Gender and school choice: Factors influencing parents when choosing single‐sex or co‐educational independent schools for their children. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 195-211. Jackson, C., & Smith, I. D. (2000). Poles apart? An exploration of single-sex and mixed-sex educational environments in Australia and England. Educational Studies, 26(4), 409-422. Jimenez, E., & Lockheed, M. E. (1989). Enhancing girls’ learning through single-sex education: Evidence and a policy conundrum. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 117-142. Karpiak, C. P., Buchanan, J. P., Hosey, M., & Smith, A. (2007). University students from single-sex and coeducational high schools: Differences in majors and attitudes at a Catholic university. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(3), 282-289. Keri, G. (2002). Male and female college students' learning styles differ: An opportunity for instructional diversification. College Student Journal, 36(3), 433-442. Lee, V. E., Marks, H. M., & Byrd, T. (1994). Sexism in single-sex and coeducational independent secondary school classrooms. Sociology of education, 92-120. 55 Limbert, C. (2001). A comparison of female university students from different school backgrounds using the eating disorder inventory. International journal of adolescent medicine and health, 13(2), 145-154. Lirgg, C. D. (1994). Environmental perceptions of students in same-sex and coeducational physical education classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 183. Logan, K. (2007). Should computing be taught in single‐sex environments? An analysis of the computing learning environment of upper secondary students. Educational Studies, 33(2), 233-248. Meinster, M. O., & Rose, K. C. (2001). Longitudinal influences of educational aspirations and romantic relationships on adolescent women's vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 313-327. Mulholland*, J., Hansen, P., & Kaminski, E. (2004). Do single-gender classrooms in coeducational settings address boys' underachievement? An Australian study. Educational Studies, 30(1), 19-32. Norfleet James, A., & Richards, H. C. (2003). Escaping stereotypes: Educational attitudes of male alumni of single-sex and coed schools. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(2), 136. O'Malley, L. (2011). Same-sex vs. co-ed classrooms: do gender differences carry over Into a co-ed college? Pellegrini, A. D., & Bohn, C. M. (2005). The role of recess in children's cognitive performance and school adjustment. Educational researcher, 34(1), 13-19. Rao, C. (2002). Karl Pearson chi-square test the dawn of statistical inference Goodness-of-fit tests and model validity (pp. 9-24): Springer. Rex, J., & Chadwell, D. (2009). Single-Gender Classrooms. School Administrator, 66(8), 28-33. Shapka, J. D. (2009). Trajectories of math achievement and perceived math competence over high school and postsecondary education: Effects of an all-girl curriculum in high school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(6), 527-541. Shapka, J. D., & Keating, D. P. (2003). Effects of a girls-only curriculum during adolescence: Performance, persistence, and engagement in mathematics and science. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 929-960. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 147- 163. Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2010). Single-sex schooling and academic attainment at school and through the lifecourse. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 6-36. Treanor, L., Graber, K., Housner, L., & Wiegand, R. (1999). Middle school students’ perceptions of coeducational and same-sex physical education classes. Journal of teaching in physical education, 18(1), 43-56. Wong, K.-C., Lam, Y. R., & Ho, L.-M. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 827-843. Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (2002). Single‐sex teaching in a co‐educational comprehensive school in England: an evaluation based upon students' performance and classroom interactions. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 353-374. Zulueta, F. M., & Costales Jr, N. E. B. (2003). Methods of research. Thesis-Writing and Applied Statistics. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/467
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. F. A. Haolader en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this research was to conduct a comparative study to find out which setting performs better between students in Coeducational Instruction setting and Students in Singlegender Instruction setting. In this research process, the researcher compared the performance of students who receive instruction in single-gender classroom with the performance of other students who receive instruction in a coeducational classroom. The population of the study was 756 students of both single and mixed-gender streams which are classified into two groups (A & B). Out of this, one single-gender male class of 268 students (group A) and one coed class of 488 students (group B) were sampled from Islamic University of Technology (IUT). The researcher adopted quasi-experimental research design. The instruments used for data collection was the summative assessment of first and second semester result of both groups that serve as a test instruments. Frequency counts and the Arithmetic means were used for descriptive analysis. The independent sample t-test statistical technique was used to test the hypotheses. This study is anchored on (Bandura, 2001) social learning theory since it emphasizes the importance of biological, social and cultural impacts on human behavioral development and learning especially on gender and genders specific traits and roles. So also an online survey questionnaire was distributed to determine how well the experimentally obtained results expected theoretically on the hypothesis. The Chi-square statistical technique was used to test the hypotheses as a test of „goodness of fit‟ (Rao, 2002). Based on the analyses and interpretation of the data, the researcher found that Students who receive instruction in co-ed class are more motivated to prepare well in making good presentation in the class than students who receive instruction in single-gender class. On the other hand, it was found that Students who receive instruction in single-gender class enjoy working in a group project or assignment more often than those students who receive instruction in co-ed class. The study also found that male students perform better academically in single-gender classes in contrary to their academic performance when mixed with female in same classes. Thus, single-gender instruction could be a more favorable environment for male students than coeducational instruction environment. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.title A Comparative Study on Engineering Student's Performance Between Single Gender Classroom and Coded in Islamic University of Technology(IUT) en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics