dc.identifier.citation |
Al-Kaisy, A., F. L. Hall, and E. S. Reisman. (2002). Developing Passenger Car Equivalents for Heavy Vehicles on Freeways during Queue Discharge Flow. Transportation Research Part A36 (8): 725–742 Highway Capacity Manual. (1950). Special Rep. No. 209. 1st ed. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC: National Research Council Chandra, S., and U. Kumar. (2003). Effect of Lane Width on Capacity under Mixed Traffic Conditions in India. Journal of Transportation Engineering129 (2): 155–160 Chandra, S., M. Mohan, and T. J. Gates. (2014). Estimation of Critical Gap Using Intersection Occupancy Time. In Proceedings of Nineteenth International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, edited by Z. Leng, 313–320, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies Limited. Arasan, V. T., and K. Krishnamurthy. (2008). Effect of Traffic Volume on PCU of Vehicles under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions. Road and Transport Research, Australian Road Research Board17 (1): 32–48 Paul, P., and P. Sarkar. (2013). Determination of Dynamic PCUs of Different Types of Passenger Vehicles on Urban Roads: A Case Study, Delhi Urban Area. Indian Highways41 (4): 37–47. New Delhi: Indian Roads Congress. Satyanarayana, P., R. K. Durga, and R. Gopala. (2012). Development of PCU Factors and Capacity Norms at mid Blocks of Rural Highways in Visakhapatnam. Indian Journal for Education and Information Management, ISEE 1 (5): 197–202. National Research Council, Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 2000. Cunagin, W., and Messer, C. (1983) Passenger Car Equivalents for Rural Highways. In Transportation Research Record 905. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC., pp. 61-68. Chandra, S., and Sikdar, P. K. (2000). Factors affecting PCU in mixed traffic situations on urban roads. Road Transp. Res., 9(3),40–50. Craus, J., Polus, A., and Grinberg, I. (1980). A revised method for determination of passenger car equivalents. Transp. Res. Part A, 14(4),241–246. Thamizh, V., and Arkatkar, S., (2009), “Study of Effect of Volume and Road Width on PCU of Vehicles under Heterogeneous Traffic”, Journal of transportation engineering P.406-415 HCM. (2000).Highway Capacity Manual, National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Indian Roads Congress (1990). Guidelines for capacity of roads in rural area. IRC code of Practice, IRC: 106, 1990, New Delhi, India Madhu, E., and Velmurugan, S., (2011), “Estimation of Roadway Capacity of Eight-lane Divided Urban Expressways under Heterogeneous Traffic Through Microscopic Simulation Models”, Journal of transportation engineering P.406-415 Chandra, S., (2004). “Capacity estimation procedure for two-lane roads under mixed traffic conditions.” J. Indian. Road. Congress, Vol.65-1, P.139-170. Nguyen, Y., Cao, and Kazushi, S., (2012). “Estimating Capacity and Motorcycle Equivalent Units on Urban Roads in Hanoi Vietnam”, journal of transportation engineering P.776-785. Adnan, M., (2014). “Passenger Car Equivalent Factors in Heterogeneous Traffic Environment-Are We Using the Right Numbers?” Procedia Engineering77 (2014): 106–113. Fourth International Symposium on Infrastructure Engineering in Developing Countries, IEDC 2013. Al Kaisy, A. F., Y. Jung, and H. Rakha. (2005). “Developing Passenger Car Equivalency Factors for Heavy Vehicles during Congestion.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE131 (7): 514–523. Arasan, V. T., and K. Krishnamurthy. (2008). “Effect of Traffic Volume on PCU of Vehicles under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions.” Road and Transport Research, Australian Road Research Board 17 (1): 32–48 Cao, N. Y., and K. Sano. (2012). “Estimating Capacity and Motorcycle Equivalent Units on Urban Roads in Hanoi, Vietnam”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE138 (6): 776–785. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Passenger Car Unit (PCU) is one of the fundamental measures in traffic engineering representing the impact a vehicle has on a road. Several major calculations in traffic, such as, capacity analysis, density determination, signal timing, etc. require conversion of traffic data into PUC. In most cases, the PCU values of conventional vehicles, such as, various kinds of trucks, buses, motorcycles, etc. are already determined by the related agencies of government. However, in the context of developing countries, a substantial part of the traffic comprise of unconventional modes of transport (UCM). Being a developing city, Dhaka city also accommodates various UCM, such as, leguna, auto-rickshaw, easy bike, etc. This study calculates the PCU values of these modes using both Speed-Data analysis method and Headway analysis method. Moreover, by calculating the Standard Deviation from these methods, the discrepancy from average value calculated in different methods are also determined.
The average PCU for auto-rickshaw using speed-data analysis method is calculated as 0.828 and from headway analysis method it is calculated as 0.642. Also the average PCU of leguna is calculated as 1.31 (speed-data analysis method) and 1.49 (headway analysis method). The difference of results using two different methods is due to inappropriate headway compared to the road conditions.
This dissertation will cover the overall procedure in finding the PCU, considering that these modes of transport play a vital role in the transportation system. Along with this, important problems are also mentioned and the difference of results obtained from different methods is showed. The reasons for the difference in PCU values are described briefly. Due to governmental jurisdictions it was not possible to take data from every roads. However, this research has huge potential in contributing to future road analysis by different organizations. |
en_US |