Mutual Context Based Word Prediction

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hasan, A.S.M. Towfique
dc.contributor.author Mohammad, Mubin
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-27T14:49:02Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-27T14:49:02Z
dc.date.issued 2018-11-15
dc.identifier.citation [1] Anind K. Dey “Understanding and Using Context,”College of Computing & GVU Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, Journal: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing archive Volume 5 Issue 1, February 2001 Pages 4-7 [2] Christian Jung, Denis Feth, Yehia Elrakaiby “Automatic Derivation of Context Descriptions ,” IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision 2015 . [3] Yair Even-Zohar, Dan Roth “A Classification Approach to Word Prediction,” De- partment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana.NAACL 2000 Pro- ceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference,2000, Pages 124-131 [4] Gregory W. Lesher, Ph.D. and Gerard J. Rinkus, Ph.D, “ Domain-specific word prediction for augmentative communication,” Enkidu Research, Inc. 247 Pine Hill Road Spencerport, NY 14559, 2001. [5] Guanling Chen and David Kotz “ A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Comput- ing Research ,” Technical Report, A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research, Dartmouth College Hanover, NH, 2000. [6] Ekman “Facial Expression and Emotion,” American Psychologist (1993) 48, 384- 392. 38 [7] Valitutti, A., Strapparava, C., Stock “Developing Affective Lexical Resources,” PsychNology Journal. (2004) Volume 2, Number 1, 61-83. [8] ’Chunling Ma, Helmut Prendinger, and Mitsuru Ishizuka1 “. Emotion Estimation and Reasoning Based on Affective Textual Interaction,’ Graduate School of In- formation Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. [9] Hisham Al-Mubaid “A Learning-Classification Based Approach for Word Predic- tion ,” Computer Science Department, University of Houston-Clear Lake, USA. [10] Hency C. Obison, Chiagozie C. Ajourah “ Energy Consumptions of Text Input Methods on Smartphones,” Master Thesis Electrical Engineering, October 2013, School of Computing and Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karl- skrona, Sweden. [11] Page T.“Usability of text input interfaces in smartphones’, January 2013 J. Design Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.39–56. [12] Lee et al “ The influence of emotion on keyboard typing: an experimental study using visual stimuli,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2014 13:81. [13] Keith Trnka, John McCawWord Kathleen F. McCoy, Christopher Pennington “Prediction and Communication Rate in AAC,” Telehealth/AT ’08 Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Telehealth/Assistive Technologies Pages 19-24. [14] Denis Anson MS and OTR , Penni Moist OTR , Mary Przywara OTR , Heather Wells OTR , Heather Saylor OTR & Hantz Maxime OTR (2006) The Effects of Word Completion and Word Prediction on Typing Rates Using On-Screen Key- boards, Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 18:2, 146-154. [15] Sachin Agarwal & Shilpa Arora “ Context Based Word Prediction for Texting Lan- guage,” Language Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, published in: Proceeding RIAO ’07 Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound) Pages 360-368, Pittsburgh, Pennsyl- vania 2007. [16] Kobus Barnard, Keiji Yanai “Mutual Information of Words and Pictures,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research archive, Volume 3, 3/1/2003, Pages 1107- 1135. [17] US Patent. Patent No: US7912700 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/583
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Md. Kamrul Hasan en_US
dc.description.abstract Word prediction systems can reduce the number of keystrokes required to form a message. In our daily life we use lots of messengers online to communicate with friends and others. In our daily life chatting is almost inevitable. In recent years the keyboards that we use have a built in structure for predicting and suggesting our next word. These suggestions are helpful in most of the cases. There already has been lots of works done in this regard and researches are still ongoing. One of the mechanisms of next word prediction is the contextual word prediction. Context is defined as, ”Context is any information that can be used to characterize the situation of an entity. An entity is a person, place, or object that is considered relevant to the interaction between a user and an application, including the user and applications themselves.” Our hypothesis is that word prediction models can be more enhanced if we use mutual context between the users as a paramater in word prediction. We also hypothesize that that mutual context based word prediction has great potential in enhancing word prediction increasing communication rate, but the amount is dependent on the accuracy of detecting the mutual context. We show that in a conversation mutual context based word predition model can do better word prediction than traditional word prediction models. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject Context, Mutual Context, Contextual Information, Local Dcitionary, Context Awareness, Word Prediction en_US
dc.title Mutual Context Based Word Prediction en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics