Integrating ICT in Engineering Education in Universities: Teacher’s knowledge Perspective in Bangladesh

Fahadi, Mugigayi

IUT Repository Home
→
Technical and Vocational Education (TVE)
→
Thesis
→
Graduate
→
2019
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Fahadi, Mugigayi
dc.date.accessioned	2020-10-28T04:37:35Z
dc.date.available	2020-10-28T04:37:35Z
dc.date.issued	2019-11-15
dc.identifier.citation	Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2011). The TriLab, a novel ICT based triple access mode laboratory education model. Computers & Education, 56(1), 262-274. Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306-1321. Alvarez, I., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: a theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321-336. Alzahrani, A., & Cheon, J. (2015). The Effects Of Instructors’ Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) On Online Courses. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. Benson, S. N. K., & Ward, C. L. (2013). Teaching with technology: Using TPACK to understand teaching expertise in online higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 153-172. Bernard, H. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches: Sage. Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective: Pearson. Blackburn, H. A. (2014). A mixed methods study: Assessing and understanding technology pedagogy and content knowledge among college level teaching faculty: Drexel University PA. Callaghan, M., Savin-Baden, M., McShane, N., & Eguiluz, A. G. (2017). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis in engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 5(1), 77-83. Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport, education and society, 22(2), 288-304. Chen, Y.-H., & Jang, S.-J. (2014). Interrelationship between stages of concern and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: A study on Taiwanese senior high school in-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 79-91. Chowdhury, H., & Alam, F. (2012). Engineering education in Bangladesh–an indicator of economic development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 217-228. 31 Chowdhury, H., Alam, F., Biswas, S. K., Islam, M. T., & Islam, A. S. (2013). Quality assurance and accreditation of engineering education in Bangladesh. Procedia Engineering, 56, 864-869. Clark, C. M. (1995). Thoughtful teaching. Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Psychology Press. Cubeles, A., & Riu, D. (2018). The effective integration of ICTs in universities: the role of knowledge and academic experience of professors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-11. Database, A.-E. (2019). BANBEIS. Retrieved 16/03/2019, from http://data.banbeis.gov.bd/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=317&Itemid=107 Davis, N., & Thompson, A. (2005). The evaluation of technology-related professional development, Part 2. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 73-87. Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Albion, P. (2010). Beyond pedagogical content knowledge: The importance of TPACK for informing preservice teacher education in Australia. Paper presented at the IFIP International Conference on Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society. Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge: Pearson Toronto. Glewwe, P., & Muralidharan, K. (2016). Improving education outcomes in developing countries: Evidence, knowledge gaps, and policy implications Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 5, pp. 653-743): Elsevier. Habibi, M., Springer, C., Spence, M., Hansen-Petrik, M., Fouts, H., & Kavanagh, K. (2015). Using Videoconferencing for Lactation Consultation: An Online Survey of Acceptance among a Sample of Mothers in the United States. The FASEB Journal, 29(1_supplement), 581.585. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school: Teachers College Press. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning: Routledge. Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological measurement, 66(3), 393-416. Hue, L. T., & Ab Jalil, H. (2013). Attitudes towards ICT Integration into Curriculum and Usage among University Lecturers in Vietnam. International Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 53-66. Islam, M. S., & Grönlund, Å. (2011). Digital Bangladesh–A Change We Can Believe in? Paper presented at the International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. 32 Jackson, D. A. (1993). Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology, 74(8), 2204-2214. Karim, M. A. (2010). Digital Bangladesh for good governance. Paper presented at the Bangladesh Development Forum. Khan, M. S. H., Hasan, M., & Clement, C. K. (2012). Barriers to the introduction of ICT into education in developing countries: The example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2). Kinchin, I. M., Lygo-Baker, S., & Hay, D. B. (2008). Universities as centres of non-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 89-103. Kirkup, G., & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 185-199. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Yahya, K., & Yadav, A. (2004). Successful teaching with technology: The complex interplay of content, pedagogy, and technology. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. Kretschmann, R. (2015). Physical Education Teachers' Subjective Theories about Integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into Physical Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 68-96. Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators' digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269-280. Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2013). Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferencing in a distance course: integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(2), 93-121. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational research methods, 9(2), 202-220. Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336. Lye, L. T. (2013). Opportunities and challenges faced by private higher education institution using the TPACK model in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 91, 294-305. Marcelo-García, C., Yot-Domínguez, C., & Mayor-Ruiz, C. (2015). University teaching with digital technologies. Comunicar, 23(45). McGaw, B. (2008). News release: Cisco, Intel and Microsoft collaborate to improve education assessments. 33 Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Pearson New International Edition: Pearson Education Limited. Neuman, W. L., & Kreuger, L. (2003). Social work research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches: Allyn and Bacon. Price, L. (2013). Modelling factors for predicting student learning outcomes in higher education Learning Patterns in Higher Education (pp. 72-93): Routledge. Reyes Jr, V. C., Reading, C., Doyle, H., & Gregory, S. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, 115, 1-19. Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers' beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and teacher education, 29, 122-131. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23. Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: Teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 225-241. Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157-177. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. Tse, A. C. (1998). Comparing response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: e-mail vs. mail. Market Research Society. Journal., 40(4), 1-12. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of computer assisted learning, 29(2), 109-121. Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. Yuan, L., Powell, S., & CETIS, J. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/592
dc.description	Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md Shahadat Hossain Khan	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Governments, Non-Government Organizations and Universities have heavily invested and advocated for use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Higher Institutes of Learning (Universities). However, there is inadequate evidence that shows that ICTs have been integrated effectively in the teaching and learning process. This study (thesis) investigates the Knowledge attributes that a University Teacher need for effective use of ICTs in their Content and Pedagogy practice in Bangladesh Engineering Universities. The Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework has been frequently used for this purpose in lower levels of education (Primary and secondary) but it’s application in Engineering Education at tertiary education level has been limited. The objectives of the study are to confirm whether TPACK framework can be applied in engineering education at Universities, analyze the knowledge competencies needed by a university teacher in order to use ICTs in educational context and study key attributes of teachers for effective integration and use of ICTs in Engineering Education. A self-assessment tool was administered to 136 teachers in Engineering field teaching two Engineering Universities. The results of the study confirm the applicability of the framework and reveals significant differences in technology and conventional knowledge regarding academic discipline of the teacher and significant difference in technology enhanced teaching in regard to the age group to which the teacher belongs. The study thus contributes to the knowledge discipline regarding use of technology to enhance teaching and education.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.title	Integrating ICT in Engineering Education in Universities: Teacher’s knowledge Perspective in Bangladesh	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US