Developing a Tensile-Shear Testing Setup for Asphalt Layers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shamim, Md. Asif Bin
dc.contributor.author Ayon, Shafi Mahmud
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-28T07:32:15Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-28T07:32:15Z
dc.date.issued 2019-11-15
dc.identifier.citation Al-Qadi, I. L., Carpenter, S. H., Leng, Z. & Ozer, H., 2008. Tack Coat Optimization for HMA Overlays: Laboratory Testing, Springfield: Illinois Center for Trasnportation. Canesrari, F., Ferrotti, G., Partl, M. N. & Santagata, E., 2005. Advanced Testing and Characterization of Interlayer Shear Resistance. Transporation Research Record, Volume 1929, pp. 69-78 Chang, G., Xu, Q., Horan, B. & Michael, L., 2010. Accelerated Implementation Of Intelligent Compaction Technology for Embankment Subgrade Soils, Aggregate Base, And Asphalt Pavement Materials, Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration. Donovan, E. P., Al-Qadi, I. L. & Loulizi, A., 2000. Optimization of Tack Coat Application Rate for Geocomposite Membrane on Bridge Deck. Trasporation Reserach Record, Volume 1740, pp. 143-150. Guide For The Evaluation of Shotcrete (ACI 506.4R), 1994. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute. International Concrete Repair Institute, 2004. Guideline for the Evaluation of Unbonded 33 Post-Tensioned Concrete Structures, s.l.: s.n. Kulkarni, M. B., 2004. Effect of Tack and Prime Coats, and Baghouse Fines on Composite Asphalt Pavements. Raleigh, NC: Thesis at North Carolina State University. Manuel Celaya, S. N. C. R. H. V. Q., 2011. Delamination Detection of Asphalt Pavements with Nondestructive Testing Devices. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of The National Academies. Mehta, Y. A., June 2007. Evaluation of Interlayer Bonding In HMA Pavements, Madison, WI: Wiscosin Department of Transportation. Mohammad, L., Button, J. & Scherocman, J. A., 2012. Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement, Washington, D. C.: Transportation Research Board. Munoz, D. M., 2009. Finite Element Modeling of Nondestructive Test Methods Used For Detection of Delamination in Hot Mixed Asphalt Pavements. El Paso, TX: Thesis at the University of Texas at El Paso. NCHRP, n.d. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide. [Online] Available at: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/mepdg/home.htm [Accessed 15 June 2014]. 34 Orosz, K. & Taljsten, B., 2009. Development of a new test method for mineral based composites. Concrete repair. rehabilitation and retrofitting. Standard Method of Test for Prediction of Asphalt-Bound Pavement Layer Temperatures (AASHTO T 317), 2004. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction and Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures (AASHTO T 319), 2008. Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/599
dc.description Supervised by Dr. Nazmus Sakib, Assistant Professor, Dept of CEE, IUT en_US
dc.description.abstract Interface bonding condition between asphalt courses plays a critical role in the pavement performance. One of the most common distresses is slippage failure, which usually occurs where heavy vehicles are often accelerating, decelerating, or turning. Other pavement problems that have been linked to poor bonding between pavement layers include premature fatigue, top down cracking, pothole, and surface layer delamination, which reduces the serviceability and performance of a pavement. There are many factors affecting the interface bonding condition, including 1) improperly cleaned interface; 2) cold temperature during placement; 3) insufficient curing, and 4) improper selection and application rate of material. Since an asphalt pavement has multi-layered structure system, the interfaces between layers are essential to the pavement performance. An interface between a surface course and an intermediate course is more emphasized since critical temperature and stress conditions for asphalt top-down cracking, rutting, and shearing are present near the pavement surface. 4 Many test methods have been developed to evaluate the interface condition in the lab and the field.There is, however, no standard test method for the evaluation. In addition, available test methods has limitation including: 1) indirect measurement, 2) limited application to the field, 3) limited measurement range, 4) acquisition of undisturbed-interface sample from coring process, and 5) lack of practicality for QC/QA. Correlation of the interface bonding to pavement performances is essential in a performance based specification for a tack coat practice. A tack coat is inexpensive, but it’s influence on pavement performance is significant. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.title Developing a Tensile-Shear Testing Setup for Asphalt Layers en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics