Analysis and Optimazation on Thermal Efficiency of Automobile Engines

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mahfuz, Araf
dc.contributor.author Ahmed, Ashik
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-28T17:37:08Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-28T17:37:08Z
dc.date.issued 2018-11-15
dc.identifier.citation 1. Clerk D. Limits of thermal efficiency in internalcombustion engines. J Am Soc Nav Eng 1907; 19(2): 494–499. 2. Sargent BE. Increasing automobile-engine thermal efficiency. SAE paper 160040, 1926. 3. Gibson HC. Bettering the efficiency of existing engines. SAE paper 200005, 1920. 4. Campbell JM, Caris DF and Withrow LL. Increasing the thermal efficiencies of internal-combustion engines. SAE paper 490202, 1949. 5. Lucas AG. Spark ignition engine progress. SAE paper 670199, 1967. 6. Turkish MC. Prechamber and valve gear design for 3- valve stratified charge engines. SAE paper 751004, 1975. 7. Tuttle JH and Toepel RR. Increased burning rates offer improved fuel economy-NOx emissions trade-offs in spark-ignition engines. SAE paper 790388, 1979. 8. Emmenthal KD, Hagemann G and Hucho WH. Turbocharging small displacement spark ignition engines for improved fuel economy. SAE paper 790311, 1979. 9. Muranaka S, Takagi Y and Ishida T. Factors limiting the improvement in thermal efficiency of S. I. engine at higher compression ratio. SAE paper 870548, 1987. 10. Zhecheng L, Brun M and Badin F. A parametric study of SI engine efficiency and of energy and availability losses using a cycle simulation. SAE paper 910005, 1991. 11. Okamoto K, Zhang F-R, Shimogata S and Shoji F. Development of a late intake-valve closing (LIVC) miller cycle for stationary natural gas engines: effect of EGR utilization. SAE paper 972948, 1997. 12. De Sousa MT, Vianna JN and Fraga AG. Study of an engine operating with exhaust gas recirculation at different compression ratios. SAE paper 982895, 1998. 13. Thomas JF and Staunton RH. What fuel economy improvement technologies could aid the competitiveness of light-duty natural gas vehicles. SAE paper 1999-01-1511, 1999. 14. Wambsganss MW. Thermal management concepts for higher-efficiency heavy vehicles. SAE paper 1999-01-2240, 1999. 15. Macek J. Limits of internal combustion engines efficiency. J KONES Int Combust Engine 2005; 12: 201–209. 16. Kutlar OA, Arslan H and Calik AT. Methods to improve efficiency of four stroke spark ignition engines at part load. Energ Convers Manage 2005; 46: 3202–3220. 17. Ayala FA, Gerty MD and Heywood JB. Effects of combustion phasing, relative air-fuel ratio, compression ratio, and load on SI engine efficiency. SAE paper 2006-01-0229, 2006. 18. Farrell JT, Stevens JG and Weissman W. A second law analysis of high efficiency low emission gasoline engine concepts. SAE paper 2006-01-0491, 2006. 19. National Academy of Sciences. Real prospects for energy efficiency in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. 20. Tey K-Y, Miller SL and Edwards CF. Thermodynamic requirements for maximum internal combustion engine cycle efficiency: part 1: optimal combustion strategy. Int J Engine Res 2008; 9: 449–465. 21. Tey K-Y, Miller SL and Edwards CF. Thermodynamic requirements for maximum internal combustion engine cycle efficiency: part 2: work extraction and reactant preparation strategies. Int J Engine Res2008; 9: 467–481. 22. Daw CS, Graves RL, Wagner RMand Caton JA. Report on the transportation combustion engine efficiency colloquium. Report no. ORNL/TM-2010/265, March 2010. 23. Lavoie GA, Ortiz-Soto E, Babajimopoulos A, Martz JB and Assanis DN. Thermodynamic sweet spot for highefficiency, dilute, boosted gasoline engines. Int J EngineRes 2013; 14(3): 260–278. 24. Foster DE. Pragmatic efficiency limits for internal combustion engines. Technical reports, readout no 42, July 2014. Kyoto, Japan: HORIBA.25. Lustgarten GA. The latest Sulzer marine diesel enginetechnology. SAE paper 851219, 1985. [25]L.Jian, H.Xue, G.Xu, X.Zhu, D.Zhao, Z.Y.Shao, “Regulated Charging of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Minimizing Load Variance in Household Smart MicroGrid,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, pp. 3218-3226, Aug. 2013. [26]V. Monteiro, H. Gonçalves, João L. Afonso, “Impact of the Electric Vehicles on the Power Quality in a Smart Grid Context,” IEEE EQPU 11th International Electrical Power Quality and Utilization Conference, Lisbon Portugal, pp. 1-6, Oct. 2011. [27]J. McDowall, “Conventional battery technologies-present and future,” IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, pp. 1538-1540, 2000. [28]A.Emadi, Y.J.Lee, K.Rajashekara, “Power Electronics and Motor Drives in Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, pp. 2237-2245, 2008. [29]V. Monteiro, J. C. Ferreira, G. Pinto, D. Pedrosa, João L. Afonso, “iV2G Charging Platform,” IEEE ITSC 13th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Madeira Portugal, pp. 409-414, Sept. 2010. [30]W. Kempton and J. Tomic, “Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 144, pp. 268-279, 2005. [31]B. Kramer, S. Chakraborty, and B. Kroposki, “A review of plug-in vehicles and vehicle-to-grid capability,” IECON 2008 - 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, pp. 2278-2283, 2008. [32]V. Monteiro, H. Gonçalves, J. C. Ferreira, João L. Afonso. “Batteries Charging Systems for Electric and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” New Advances in Vehicular Technology and Automotive Engineering, 1st ed., J.P.Carmo and J.E.Ribeiro, Ed. InTech, 2012, pp. 149-168, ISBN 978-953-51- 0698-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/2617. [33]Bimal K. Bose, “Energy, Environment, and Advances in Power Electronics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 15, pp. 688-701, July 2000. [34]S. G. Wirasingha, R. Gremban, A. Emadi, “Source to Wheel (STW) Analysis of Plug in Hybrid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grids, vol. 3, pp. 316- 331, Mar. 2012. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/624
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Nurul Absar Chowdhury en_US
dc.description.abstract The thermodynamic limitation for the maximum efficiencies of internal combustion engines is an important consideration for the design and development of future engines. Knowing these limits helps direct resources to those areas with the most potential for improvements. Automobile engines are run by internal combustion. Most internal combustion engines are incredibly inefficient at turning fuel burned into usable energy. Using various resources which includes the first and second laws of thermodynamics, this study has determined the fundamental thermodynamics that are responsible for these limits. This Study is about how optimizations can be done to get the best thermal efficiency out of automobile engines and how they can be applied in practical life. First we will study about the different types of engines and their thermal efficiency. Then we will find their lackings and limitations. Based upon that we will make optimization on different aspects of engines and discuss about the ways to enhance their ability. There are various systems to enhance thermal efficiency of automobile engines, we tried to explore them as much as possible here and draw a clear line for the most efficient and optimum way for enhancing thermal efficiency. Better thermal efficiency will not only just save fuel, it will also reduce CO2 emission and hence cause a positive impact on our environment. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.title Analysis and Optimazation on Thermal Efficiency of Automobile Engines en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics