Effect of Variation of Aerodynamic Brake Plate Orientation and Multiple Brake Geometries on Incident Drag of Hyperloop Pod

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khan, Shahnoor Shamim
dc.contributor.author Mahmud, Shadman
dc.contributor.author Adnan, Adib
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-13T06:27:56Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-13T06:27:56Z
dc.date.issued 2019-11-15
dc.identifier.citation [1] E. Musk, “Hyperloop alpha”, SpaceX Retrieved August 13 2013 [2] J. Braun, J. Sousa, C. Pekardan, “Aerodynamic Design and Analysis of the Hyperloop”, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906, AIAA Journal [3] M.M.J. Opgenoord, P.C. Caplan, “Aerodynamic Design of the Hyperloop Concept”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139 [4] J.C.Chin, J.S.Gray, S.M.Jones, J.J.Berton, “Open-Source Conceptual Sizing Model for the Hyperloop Passenger Pod”, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 56th American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)/ASCE/ASH/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference January 2015 [5] X. Chen, L. Zhao, J. Ma, Y. Liu, “Aerodynamic Simulation of evacuated tube maglev trains with different streamline designs”, Journal of Modern Transportation, Volume 20, Number 2, June 2012, Page 115-120 [6] M. Woelke, “Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models employed by Computational Fluid Dynamics”, Transactions of the Institute of Aviation No. 191 [7] M. Puharic, D. Matic, S. Linic, S. Ristic, V. Lucanin, “Determination of Braking Force on the Aerodynamic Brake by Numerical Simulations”, FME Transactions, Volume 42, Number 2, Page 106-111 [8] I. Vasovic, M. Maksimovic, M. Puharic, D. Matic, S. Linic, “Structural Analysis of Aerodynamic Brakes in High-Speed Trains”, Scientific Technical Review, 2011, Vol.61, No.2, Page 10-15 [9] F. R. Menter, “Improved two-equation k-turbulence models for aerodynamic flows" NASA technical memorandum 103975, no. 1 (1992) [10] Y. A. Cengel, J. M. Cimbala, Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill [11] Y. A. Cengel, A. J. Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill [12] J. Tu, G. H. Yeoh, C. Liu, Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Approach, 2nd edition, Butterworth-Heinemann 68 [13] J. D. Anderson Jr, Fundamentals of aerodynamics, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2010 [14] G. A. Bird, Molecular Gas Dynamics, NASATR A76, 1976 [15] J. D. Anderson Jr, Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications, International Edition 1995, McGraw-Hill [16] H. K. Versteeg, W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, 2nd edition, Pearson Education Limited [17] SpaceX Hyperloop Test Track Specification, Revision 5.0, February 2016 [18] MIT Hyperloop Final Report, August 2017 [19] https://www.spacex.com/hyperloop [20] https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/22/17601280/warr-hyperloop-pod-competition-spacex-elon-musk [21] https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/22/20703423/tum-hyperloop-record-463-kmph-spacex-elon-musk-competition [22] https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-2018-hyperloop-success-celebration-2019-registration-opened/ [23] M. Puharić, V. Lučanin, S. Ristić, S. Linić, “Application Of The Aerodynamical Brakes On Trains”, Research And Design In Commerce & Industry, Issn 1451-4117, Udc 33, 8(2010)1, 2010,168, Pages 13-21 [24] https://www.hyperloop.global/about [25] https://hyperloop-one.com [26] Z. Jianyong, W. Mengling, T. Chun, X. Ying, L. Zhuojun, C. Zhongkai, “Aerodynamic braking device for high-speed trains: Design, simulation and experiment”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 2014 228: 260 DOI: 10.1177/0954409712471620 [27] M. Yoshimura, S. Saito, S. Hosoka, H. Tsunoda, “Characteristic of the Aerodynamic Brake of the Vehicle on the Yamanashi MAGLEV Test Line”, QR of RTRI, Volume 41, No. 2, June 2000 [28] T. S. Saniat and M. R. Uddin, “Feasibility analysis of an aerodynamic braking system for the Hyperloop Transport Pod in low pressure, high Mach flow regime”, IUT, 2018 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/686
dc.description Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Hamidur Rahman Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering (MPE) Islamic University of Technology en_US
dc.description.abstract The idea for the Hyperloop has received significant attention, with commentators and analysts expecting it to become a revolutionary and potentially the fastest mode of land transportation on the planet. Various companies and multiple universities are involved in the development of this new system and in combatting the myriad of design challenges that it poses. Of particular interest in academic circles has been the optimization of the pod geometry and fluid flow regime for the functioning of the Hyperloop pod in the low-pressure environment. Multiple studies have been carried out using numerical simulations to obtain insights into the different factors affecting the Hyperloop’s performance. The low-pressure tube through which the Hyperloop pod travels, presents a case that has not been faced in other transport models. The Hyperloop pod is expected to travel at speeds close to Mach 1.0, and as such acceleration and deceleration of the pod is of critical importance if passenger safety protocols are to be maintained. The high-speed flow around the pod exerts high adverse pressure gradients on the pod surface, resulting in boundary layer separation, increasing drag and affecting the acceleration of the pod and requiring greater power. Numerical simulations have shown that the placement of an aerodynamic brake plate on the pod surface at the point at which boundary layer separation occurs in the low-pressure region provides the necessary drag required for safe deceleration, as well as provide the required downforce to counteract the lift forces, which become significant due to the low-pressure regions above the pod, enabling the pod to stay on the track. This study was aimed to find the best angle for the aerodynamic brake plate positioned at a fixed point of 0.24 of the chord length of the pod, allowing for the maximum generation of drag, using numerical simulations. After various trials, it was observed that placing the plate normal to the flow produced the highest drag, with one exception –when angling the plate backwards while increasing its length to keep incident brake profile constant, the drag at first increased slightly and then decreased. This study also studied another design feature, one involving the brake plate split and placed at different chord lengths of the pod. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject aerodynamics, CFD, compressible flow, fluid mechanics, high speed transport, numerical analysis, turbulence en_US
dc.title Effect of Variation of Aerodynamic Brake Plate Orientation and Multiple Brake Geometries on Incident Drag of Hyperloop Pod en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUT Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics