Breast Tumor Classification Using RF Data From Specific Regions of Ultrasound Images

Muhtadi, Sabiq; Ahmed, Shaiban

IUT Repository Home
→
Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEE)
→
Thesis
→
Undergraduate
→
2019
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Muhtadi, Sabiq
dc.contributor.author	Ahmed, Shaiban
dc.date.accessioned	2020-12-18T09:21:19Z
dc.date.available	2020-12-18T09:21:19Z
dc.date.issued	2019-11-15
dc.identifier.citation	[1] Schneider AP II, Zainer CM, Kubat CK, Mullen NK, Windisch AK, “The breast cancer epidemic: 10 facts”, Linacre Q, vol 81, issue 3, pp. 244-277, 2014. [2] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries”, CA Cancer J Clin, vol. 68, issue 6, pp. 394-424, 2018. [3] Md. Anisur Rahman Farazy, “Incidence of Breast Cancer in Bangladesh,” Health Care, vol. 3, issue 3, pp. 53-54, October, 2015. [4] American Cancer Society, in Cancer Facts and Figures, 2019. [5] Siegel RL, Miller KD & Jemal A, “Cancer Statistics, 2019,” CA Cancer J Clin, vol. 69, issue 1, pp. 7 – 34, 2019. [6] Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, Chiu SY, Chen SL, Fann JC, Rosell J, Fohlin H, Smith RA, Duffy SW, “Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades”, Radiology, vol. 260, issue 3, pp. 658–663, 2011. [7] Duff SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen MF, Abdsalah S, Epstein B, Frodis E, Ljungberg E, Hedborg-Melander C, Sundbom A, Tholin M, Wiege M, Akerlund A, Wu HM, Tung TS, Chiu YH, Chiu CP, Huang CC, Smith RA, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Holmberg L, “The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties”, Cancer, vol. 95, issue 3, pp. 458–469, 2002. [8] Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M, Ferrari A, Speziani M, Bellarosa S, Remida G, Gasparotti C, Galligioni E, Ciatto S, “Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up”, Eur. J. Cancer, vol. 47, pp. 1021–1026, 2011. [9] Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH, “Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations”, Radiology, vol. 225, pp. 165-175, 2002. [10] Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ, “Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer”, N Engl J Med, vol. 356, pp.227-236, 2007. [11] Carkaci, S, Santiago, L, Adrada, BE, Whitman GJ, “Screening for breast cancer with sonography”, Semin Roentgenol, vol. 46, issue 4, pp. 285–291, 2011. [12] Weigert, J, Steenbergen S, “The Connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts”, Breast J, vol. 18, issue 6, pp. 517–522, 2012. [13] Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH, “Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations”, Radiology, vol. 225, pp. 165-175, 2002. [14] Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K, “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer”, JAMA, vol. 299, issue 18, pp. 2152–2163, 2008. [15] Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA, “Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions”, Radiology, vol. 196, issue 1, pp. 123-134, 1995. 68 [16] Oelze ML & Mamou J, “Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasonic,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 63, issue 2, pp. 336-351, February 2016. [17] J. Mamou & M. L. Oelze, Quantitative Ultrasound in Soft Tissues. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2013. [18] Smith, N, & Webb, A (2010). Ultrasound imaging. In Introduction to Medical Imaging: Physics, Engineering and Clinical Applications (Cambridge Texts in Biomedical Engineering, pp. 145-203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [19] Solomon, SD, Wu, J, Gillam, L, Bulwer, B (2015). Echocardiography. In D. L. Mann, D. P. Zipes, P. Libby, R. O. Bonow, & E. Braunwald (Eds.), Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine (10th ed.) (pp. 179–260). Philadelphia: Elsevier. [20] D’hooge, J, & Mertens, L L (2016). Ultrasound physics. In W. W. Lai, L. L. Mertens, M. S. Cohen, & T. Geva (Eds.), Echocardiography in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: From Fetus to Adult (2nd ed.) (pp. 2–18). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. [21] Armstrong, W. F., & Ryan, T. (Eds.). (2010). Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [22] Cikes M, D’hooge J & Solomon SD (2018). “Physical Principles of Ultrasound and Generation of Images. In Essential Echocardiography, (1st ed.) (pp. 1-15). Elsevier. [23] Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B., Nelson P, Ransohoff DF, Welch HG, Hwang S, Berry DA, Kinzler KW, Black WC, Bissell M, Parnes H, Srivasta S, “Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 15, issue 6, pp 234-242, May, 2014. [24] Welch HG, Black WC, “Overdiagnosis in Cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 102, issue 9, May, 2010. [25] Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al., ACR BI-RADS® Ultrasound, In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Reston, VA, American College of Radiology, 2013. [26] Advanced Technology Laboratories (1994). Summary of Atl-Sponsored Breast Ultrasound Study and Preliminary Findings. ATL publications. [27] Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH, “Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US––diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics”, Radiology, vol. 207, pp. 191–199, 1998. [28] Skaane P, Engedal K, “Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma”, AJR, vol. 170, pp. 109–114, 1998. [29] Huber S, Danes J, Zuna I, Teubner J, Medl M, Delorme S, “Relevance of sonographic B-mode criteria and computer-aided ultrasonic tissue characterization in differential/diagnosis of solid breast masses”, Ultra sound Med Biol, vol. 26, issue 8, pp. 1243–1252, 2000. [30] American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Atlas (American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2003). [31] D’Astous FT & Foster FS, “Frequency Dependance of Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter in Breast Tissue,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 12, issue 10, pp. 795-808, 1986. [32] Nam K, Zagzebski JA & Hall TJ,”Quantitative Assessment of In Vivo Breast Masses Using Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 35, issue 2, pp. 146–161, April, 2013. [33] Lizzi FL, Astor M, Liu T, Deng C, Coleman DJ & Silverman RH, “Ultrasonic Spectrum Analysis for Tissue Assays and Therapy Evaluation,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 3-10, 1997. [34] Lizzi FL, Astor M, Feleppa EJ, Shao M & Kalisz A, “Statistical Framework for Ultrasonic Spectral Parameter Imaging,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 23, issue 9, pp. 1371-1382, 1997. 69 [35] Alam SK, Feleppa EJ, Rondeau M, Kalisz A and Garra BS, “Ultrasonic Multi-Feature Analysis Procedure for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Solid Breast Lesions,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 17-38, 2011. [36] Kabir S.M., Bhuiyan M.I.H.: “Classification of Breast Tumor in Contourlet Transform Domain,” 2018 10th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (ICECE), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2018. [37] Layek K., Samanta S., Sadhu A., Maity S.P. and Barui A.: Classification of sonoelastography images of prostate cancer using transformation-based feature extraction techniques, Soft Computing Based Medical Image Analysis, Academic press, 2018. [38] Shankar PM, “A General Statistical Model for Ultrasonic Backscattering from Tissues,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 47, issue 3, pp. 727-736, May 2000. [39] Shankar PM, Dumane VA, Reid JM, Genis V, Forsberg F, Piccoli CW & Goldberg BB, “Classification of Ultrasonic B-Mode Images of Breast Masses Using Nakagami Distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 48, issue 2, pp. 569-580, March 2001. [40] Dutt V & Greenleaf JF, “Ultrasound Echo Envelope Analysis Using a Homodyned K Distribution Signal Model,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 16, issue 4, pp. 265-287, October 1994. [41] Hruska, David P (2009), Improved Techniques for Statistical Analysis of the Envelope of Backscattered Ultrasound Using the Homodyned K Distribution, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. [42] Hruska DP & Oelze ML, “Improved Parameter Estimates Based on the Homodyned K Distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 56, issue 11, pp. 2471-2481, November 2009. [43] Trop I, Destrempes F, Khoury ME, Robidoux A, Gaboury L, Allard L, Chayer B & Cloutier G, “The Added Value of Statistical Modelling of Backscatter Properties in the Management of Breast Lesion at US,” Radiology, vol. 275, issue 3, June 2015 [44] Pohlman S., Powell K.A., Obuchowski N.A., Chilcote W.A. and Grundfest-Broniatowski S., “Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms,” Medical Physics, vol. 23, issue 8, pp. 1337-1345, August, 1996.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/724
dc.description	Supervised by Dr Md. Taslim Reza Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE) Islamic University of Technology (IUT	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Diagnostic ultrasound imaging of the breast is characterized by its non-invasive, radiation free and convenient nature. Such qualities distinguish it from other imaging modalities of the breast, such as mammography and MRI, and has made it an increasingly popular choice for researchers, clinicians as well as patients. Conventional ultrasound imaging of the breast is mainly qualitative in nature, based on analyzing morphological features, and often have a lack of functional and quantitative information. Thus, although conventional ultrasound has a high sensitivity to breast lesions, it often lacks the specificity required to classify such lesions into their benign or malignant counterparts. In this regard, quantitative ultrasound techniques present a viable alternative, as it can provide specific quantitative variables by which to assess tissue features, and thus potentially increase the specificity as well as classification accuracy related to the procedure. This thesis presents a classification approach for benign and malignant tumors of the breast, utilizing parameters extracted from the power spectrum of ultrasound radio-frequency echo signals. Our work shows a clear separation between the two types of lesions with regards to the parameters. Furthermore, the parameters are able to classify lesions with an accuracy of 100% using Linear Support Vector Mechanism, and thus has the potential to assist in the diagnostic procedure associated with the detection of breast cancer.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Islamic University of Technology,Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.title	Breast Tumor Classification Using RF Data From Specific Regions of Ultrasound Images	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US