Mobility Effect on Different MIMO Modes and Scheduler Schemes under Different Network Layout in Downlink LTE-A

Abied, Syed Rafiee

IUT Repository Home
→
Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEE)
→
Thesis
→
Graduate
→
2020
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	Abied, Syed Rafiee
dc.date.accessioned	2021-01-29T09:32:27Z
dc.date.available	2021-01-29T09:32:27Z
dc.date.issued	2020-08-31
dc.identifier.citation	1. Tara Ali-Yahiya, "Understanding LTE and its performance", Springer 2011. 2. Rohde & Schwarz: Introduction to MIMO, Application Note 1MA142, July 2009.4G Americas, “Mobile Broadband Evolution Towards 5G: Rel-12 & Rel-13 and Beyond”, June 2015. 3. Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Channels and Modulation, Release 10; 3GPP TS 36.211 V 12.5.0, March 2015.Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio. "Physical layer procedures." (2008). 4. 4G Americas, “Mobile Broadband Evolution Towards 5G: Rel-12 & Rel-13 and Beyond,” June 2015. 5. Mo, J., &Walrand, J. ,“Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control”,IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 8(5), Page-556–567,June 2000. 6. M. Ghorbanzadeh,“Utility function and radio resource allocation, cellular communication systems in congested environment”, Berlin,Springe,2000. 7. V Kavitha,A.Eitan, El-Azouzi, R., &Sundaresan, R. , “Fair scheduling in cellular systems in the presence of noncooperative mobiles” ,in Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, San Diego, CA, USA. 8. D.Moraes, T. M., Nisar, M. D., Gonzalez, A., &E.Seidel, “Resource allocation in relay enhanced LTE-advanced networks”,EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking,P1–12 ,2012. 9. Holma, H., Toskala, A., &Reunanen, J. (2016). LTE small cell optimization, 3GPP evolution to release13 New York: Wiley. 10.V.Chandrasekhar& Andrews, J. G.,“Femtocell networks: A survey”,IEEE Communication Magazine, 46(9), 59–67, 2008. 11. F. B.Frederiksen, Ramjee Prasad. , “An overview of OFDM and related techniques towards development of future wireless multimedia communications”, in Proceedings RAWCON 2002. 2002 IEEE radio and wireless conference(Cat. No. 02EX573), (pp. 19–22),2002. 12. S.Nagaraj, Sarkar, M., &Biswash, S. K. ,“A heterogeneous cellular communication system for moving users: A 5G prospective”,WINNCOMM SDR, 15, 164–171,2015. 13. S. A.Mahmud,G. M Khan, H. Zafar,K.Ahmad, &N.Behttani , “A survey on femtocells: Benefits deployment models and proposed solutions”,Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 11(5), 733–754, 2013. 14. G.de la Roche, A.Valcarce,D. Lopez-Perez, &J.Zhang, “ Access control mechanisms for femtocells”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(1), 33–39,2010. Page \| 64 15. M.Taranetz,M. Rupp,“ Performance of femtocell access point deployments in user hot-spot scenarios”, In Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC), Brisbane, QLD, Australia,2012. 16. M.Taranetz, J. C. Ikuno&M. Rupp, “Sensitivity of OFDMA-based macrocellular LTE networks to femtocell deployment density and isolation”, In ISWCS, the tenth international Symposium on Wireless Communication System,Ilmenau, Germany,2013. 17. L .Weifeng, Y .Li,Z.Qihua, &C.Siguang, “Performance analysis of cell selection solution in macro-pico heterogeneous networks”, In 2nd IEEE international conference on computer and communications (ICCC), Chengdu, China (pp. 1530–1534),2016. 18. D Claussen,H.Claussen,H.Uzunalioglu, “On femto deployment architectures and macrocell offloading benefits in joint macro-femto deployments”,IEEE Communications Magazine, 48, 26–32 , 2010. 19. Cheng, S.-M., Lien, Shou-Yu., Chu, F.-S., & Chen, K.-C., “ On exploiting cognitive radio to mitigate interference in macro/femto heterogeneous networks”,IEEE Wireless Communications, 18(3), 40–47,2011. 20. D.Lopez-Perez ,Valcarce, A., de la Roche, G., & Zhang, J.,“OFDMA femtocells: A roadmap on interference avoidance”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(9), 41–48,2009. 21. P. K. Mishra, Pandey, S., &S. K.Biswash, “Efficient resource management by exploiting D2D communication for 5G networks”, IEEE Access, 4, 9910–9922,2016. 22. K.C.Balachandran, , D. Joshi, N.S., Kang, J. H., &A. Kogiantis, “ Method of resource allocation in a wireless communication system”, US Patent App. 11/534,271,2008. 23. Shao-Yu Lien, Yu-Yu ,& K.C. Lin, “Cognitive and game-theoretical radio resource management for autonomous femtocells with QoS guarantees. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(7), 2196–2206,2011. 24. GPPTS 36.300v8.12.0 Release 8. Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and (E-UTRAN). Overall description. Stge2. 25. F.Capozzi, G.Piro,L. A.Grieco, G.Boggia& P .Camarda ,“Downlink packet scheduling in LTE cellular networks: Key design issues and a survey”,IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(2), 678–900,2013. 26. M. H. Habafbi, J.Chebil,A. G.Sakkaf, T. H.Dahawi,“Comparison between scheduling techniques in long term evolution”,IIUM Engineering Journal, 14(1), 66–75,2013. 27. Jabbar, A. I. A., & Abdullah, F. Y.. Long term evolution (LTE) scheduling algorithms in wireless sensor networks (WSN). International Journal of Computer Applications, 121(10), 12– 16,2015. Page \| 65 28.S.Schwarz, C.Mehlfuhrer&M. Rupp, “Throughput maximizing multiuser scheduling with adjustable fairness”, In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Kyoto, Japan,2011 29. S.Schwarz, C.Mehlführer, &M. Rupp , “Low complexity approximate maximum throughput scheduling for LTE”,In Conference record of the forty fourth Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, Pacific Grove, CA, USA (pp. 1563–1569),2010. 30. S. A. Alqahtani, M.Alhassany, “Performance modeling and evaluation of novel scheduling algorithm for LTE networks”,In IEEE 12th international symposium on network computing and applications, Cambridge, MA, USA (pp. 101–105),2013. 31. H.Kim&Y.Han, “A proportional fair scheduling for multicarrier transmission systems”,IEEE Communications Letters, 9(3), p210–212,2005. 32. Z.Sun, C.Yin, G.Yue, “Reduced-complexity proportional fair scheduling for OFDMA systems”,In IEEE international conference on communications, circuits, and systems (pp. 121– 1225),2006. 33. R.Kwan, C.Leung&J.Zhang,“Resource allocation in an LTE cellular communication system”,In IEEE international conference on communications, Dresden, Germany,2009. 34. C.Deniz, O. G.Uyan, &V. C.Gungor, “On the performance of lte downlink scheduling algorithms: A case study on edge throughputs”, Elsevier Journal of Computer Standards Interference, 59, 96–108,2018. 35. B. Krasniqi and B.Rexha, “Analysis of macro-femto cellular performance in LTE under various transmission power and scheduling schemes”, Journal of Communications, 13(3), 119– 123,2018. 36.M. K.Ismail, A. A. M.Isa, , M. S. Johal,M. R. Ahmad, M. S. I. M. Zin, , M. I. M.Isa,“Design and analysis of modified-proportional fair scheduler for LTE femtocell networks”. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2–5), 7–11,2017. 37. A. Lozano & N. Jindal, “Transmit Diversity vs. Spatial Multiplexing in Modern MIMO Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 186-197, 2010. 38.D. Love, R. Heath, V. Lau, D. Gesbert, B. Rao, and M. Andrews, “An overview of limited feedback in wireless communication systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., Vol. 26, Oct. 2008. 39. D.Calin, H.Claussen, and H.Uzunalioglu, “On Femto Deployment Achitectures and Macrocell Offloading Benefits in Joint Macro-Femto Deployments,” IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 26 – 32, Jan. 2001 40. C.Kosta, B. Hunt, A.UlQuddus& R.Tafazolli, “On interference avoidance through intercell interference coordination (ICIC) based on OFDMA mobile systems”,IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, 15(3), 973–995,2013. Page \| 66 41. M. K.Muller, S.Schwar,&M. Rupp, “,QoSInvestigation of Proportional Fair Scheduling in LTE Networks”,IEEE Poster: Wireless Days, Valencia, Spain,2013. 42. L.Gavrilovska&D.Talevski, “Novel scheduling algorithms for LTE downlink transmission”,In 19th telecommunications forum (TELFOR) proceedings of papers (Vol. 4(1), pp. 20–25), Belgrade, Serbia,2011. 43. R.Kwan, ,C. Leung, J. Zhang, “Proportional fair multiuser scheduling in LTE”,IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 16(6), 461–464,2009. 44. M.Escheikh, H.Jouini, &, K.Barkaoui, “Performance analysis of a novel downlink scheduling algorithm for LTE systems”,In International conference on advanced networking distributed systems and applications,Bejaia, Algeria (pp. 13–18),2014. 45. G.Aiyetoro, ,FTakawira, “A new user scheduling scheme in LTE/LTE-a networks using cross-layer design approach”, In MILCOM 2015–2015 IEEE military communications conference, Tampa, FL, USA (pp. 689–694),2015. 46. M.Rupp, S.Schwarz&M.Taranetz, “The Vienna LTE-advanced simulators: Up and downlink, link and system level simulation”,Springer: Signals and Communication Technology,2016. 47. M. H.LukmanhakimSukeran,M. M. Al-HarethZyoud, S. H.Ahmad, , M. DAmelia Wong&,R.Islam, “ Performance evaluation of LTE scheduling techniques for heterogeneous traffic and different mobility scenarios”, SpringerAdvanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, v-315, p141–150,2014 48. G. J. M.Janssen,P. A.Stigter&R.Prasad , “Wideband indoor channel measurements and BER analysis of frequency selective multipath channels at 2.4, 4.75, and 11.5 GHz”,IEEE Transactions on Communications, 44(10), 1272–1288,1996. 49. LTE System Level Simulator v1.6r885 by Institute Of communication and Radio Frequency Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna 50. Technical Specification Group RAN, “E-UTRA; LTE RF system scenarios,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Tech. Rep. TR 36.942 version 10.2.0 Release 10, 2011 51. F. Gunnarsson, M.N. Johansson, A. Furuskar, M. Lundevall, A. Simonsson, C. Tidestav, M. Blomgren, “Downtilted base station antennas – a simulation model proposal and impact on HSPA and LTE performance”, in IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference VTC, Calgary, Canada, 2008. 52. L. Wan,S. Tsai,and M. Almgren, “A Fading-Insensitive Performance metric for a United Link Quality Model,” Proceedings of Wireless Communication and Networking Conference (WCNC) , pp. 2110-2114, 3-6 April, 2006. 53. S. Sesia, I. Toufik and M. Baker, “LTE - The UMTS Long Term Evolution - from theory to practice,” Wiley, 2009. Page \| 67 54. Abdullah Bin Shams,Syed Rafiee Abied, Md. Ashraful Hoque., “ Impact of user mobility on the performance of downlink resource scheduling in Heterogeneous LTE cellular networks”, International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Communication Technology ICEEICT, Vol: , Page No: 1, Issue: 3, Year: 2016 DOI: 10.1109/CEEICT.2016.78730 55. A. B. Shams,S.R.Abied,MdAsaduzzaman, Md. Farhad Hossain ,“Mobility effect on thedownlink performance of spatial multiplexing techniques under different scheduling algorithms in heterogeneous network”, International Conference on Electrical Computer and Communication Engineering ECCE, Vol: , Page No: 905, Issue: 1, Year: 2018 56. A.B. Shams,S.R. Abied, Md.Farhad Hossain , “Performance comparison of network layouts with mobile users under different resource scheduling techniques in downlink LTE”, 5th International Conference on Informatics Electronics and Vision ICIEV 2016, Vol: , Page No: 949, Issue: 5, Year: 2016 57. S. R. Abied, A. B. Shams, Mohammad T Kawser , “Comparison of the LTE Performance Parameters in Different Environments under Close Loop Spatial Multiplexing (CLSM) Mode in Downlink LTE-A”, Journal of Computer and Communications, Vol: , Page No: 117, Issue: 9, Year: 2017 .	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/798
dc.description	Supervised by Dr. Mohammad Tawhid Kawser, Professor, Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Gazipur.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Modern wireless communication systems have to meet the demand of very high data rates. Unlike conventional methods, LTE addresses the higher data rate by introducing several Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output (MIMO) transmission modes. Transmit diversity and Spatial multiplexing techniques are the most popular techniques that are used now- a -days. Open loop and closed loop spatial multiplexing techniques can both transmit multiple data streams in a single time interval. This significantly enhances the data rate and channel capacity. In addition, closed loop spatial multiplexing uses a Pre-coding matrix indicator which is fed back from the UE to the base station and this optimizes the data transmission. Resource scheduler type also has a significant impact on the system performance because the scheduler performance ranges from optimizing the UE fairness to maximizing the UE throughput. In practical, many User Equipments (UEs) can move at high velocities and which affects the overall performance of scheduler. Thus, UE mobility must be taken into account for a fair comparison between different schedulers and transmission modes. Therefore, thorough performance analysis with different combination of transmission modes, scheduling types and network layouts can be greatly helpful. The performance analysis can be done using computer simulations instead of real network to save the cost. The results of the analysis can be used for proper settings in the real network. In other words, for optimizing the network system and reducing the operational cost of the operator, performance analysis must be done for choosing the right scheduler and transmission modes for different network layout under mobility. In this work, a thorough performance analysis has been done for various LTE downlink performance parameters between several MIMO techniques to find which MIMO mode is best suited for mobile users and dense urban environment under different scheduling algorithms in different network Layouts.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Islamic University of Technology,Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh	en_US
dc.title	Mobility Effect on Different MIMO Modes and Scheduler Schemes under Different Network Layout in Downlink LTE-A	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US