- IUT Repository Home
- →
- Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE)
- →
- Thesis
- →
- Undergraduate
- →
- 2013
- →
- View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Alam, Sajibul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Masud, Nafis Bin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rahaman, Nabil | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-09T04:08:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-09T04:08:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-11-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. ACI (1999). “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-99) and Commentary (ACI 318R-99)”, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, U.S.A. 2. BNBC (2006). “Bangladesh National Building Code”. 3. Al-Ali, A.A.K. and Krawinkler, H. (1998). “Effects of Vertical Irregularities on Seismic Behavior of Building Structures”, Report No. 130, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, U.S.A. 4. BIS (1962). “IS 1893-1962: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 5. BIS (1966). “IS 1893-1966: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (First Revision)”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi 6. BIS (1970). “IS 1893-1970: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (Second Revision)”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 7. BIS (1975). “IS 1893-1975: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (Third Revision)”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 8. BIS (1984). “IS 1893-1984: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (Fourth Revision)”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 9. BIS (2002). “IS 1893 (Part 1)-2002: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1 – General Provisions and Buildings (Fifth Revision)”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 10. BSSC (2003). “The 2003 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 2: Commentary (FEMA 450)”, Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC, U.S.A. 11. Chintanapakdee, C. and Chopra, A.K. (2004). “Seismic Response of Vertically Irregular Frames: Response History and Modal Pushover Analyses”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 8, pp. 1177-1185. 12. Das, S. and Nau, J.M. (2003). “Seismic Design Aspects of Vertically Irregular Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 455-477. 13. Esteva, L. (1992). “Nonlinear Seismic Response of Soft-First-Story Buildings Subjected to Narrow-Band Accelerograms”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 373-389. 14. FEMA (2000). “Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings”, Report FEMA 350, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, U.S.A. 56 15. Fragiadakis, M., Vamvatsikos, D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2006). “Evaluation of the Influence of Vertical Irregularities on the Seismic Performance of a Nine-Storey Steel Frame”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 1489-1509. 17. ICBO (1994). “1994 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2: Structural Engineering Design Provisions”,International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, U.S.A. 18. ICBO (1997). “1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2”, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, U.S.A. 19. Kreger, M.E. and Sozen, M.A. (1989). “Seismic Response of Imperial County Services Building in 1979”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 12, pp. 3095-3111. 20. Mahin, S.A., Bertero, V.V., Chopra, A.K. and Collins, R.G. (1976). “Response of the Olive View Hospital Main Building during the San Fernando Earthquake”, Report UCB/EERC-76/22, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A. 21. Moehle, J.P. and Alarcon, L.F. (1986). “Seismic Analysis Methods for Irregular Buildings”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 35-52. 23. Ruiz, S.E. and Diederich, R. (1989). “The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985 – The Seismic Performance of Buildings with Weak First Storey”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 89-102. 24. Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. and Krawinkler, H. (1997). “Evaluation of Inelastic MDOF Effects for Seismic Design”, Report No. 120, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, U.S.A. 26. Valmundsson, E.V. and Nau, J.M. (1997). “Seismic Response of Building Frames with Vertical Structural Irregularities”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 1, pp. 30-41. 27. Wong, C.M. and Tso, W.K. (1994). “Seismic Loading for Buildings with Setbacks”, Canadian Journal ofCivil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 863-871. 28. Wood, S.L. (1992). “Seismic Response of R/C Frames with Irregular Profiles”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 2, pp. 545-566. 29. Arturo E. Schultz. “Approximating lateral stiffness of stories in elastic frames” | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/903 | |
| dc.description | Supervised by Dr. Md. Jahidul Islam Assistant Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Islamic University of Technology (IUT) Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Irregularity is an inevitable occurrence in RCC frame structures now a days. The effect of this irregularity can be devastating. It can cause failure of structure in case of earthquake and heavy wind load. Sudden changes in stiffness and strength or mass in either vertical or horizontal planes of a building can result in distributions of lateral loads and deformations different from those that are anticipated for uniform structures. Large overturning forces that developed in the structure had to be carried by the columns that contributed to severe damage in the column. This work presents an investigation on vertical irregularity of RCC frame structures. The software based analysis that is called ETABS 9.7.0 is done for obtaining the behavior of structures in such irregular cases. Then some analytical analysis is done for obtaining the variation of stiffness and overturning. A total number of 5 different cases have been analyzed, where all the properties of each case is compared to other cases. After comparing all the results, a possible solution and further recommendation is proposed. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh | en_US |
| dc.title | A Study of Vertical Discontinuity on RCC Frame Structures | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
2013 [15]