dc.identifier.citation |
1 Carlos Paniagua*, Huber Flores, Satish Narayana Sriram,"Mobile Sensor Data Classi cation for Human Activity Recognition using MapReduce on Cloud ",The 9th International Conference on Mobile Web Information Systems (MobiWIS 2012) 2 Mitja Lu trek1, Hristijan Gjoreski1, Simon Kozina1, Bo idara Cvetkovi, Violeta Mirchevska, Matja Gams, Jo ef Stefan,"Detecting Falls with Location Sensors and Accelerometers",Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Innovative Applications of Arti cial Intelligence Conference 3 Tanzeem Choudhury,Sunny Consolvo, Beverly Harrison,Je rey Hightower, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand,Ali Rahimi, and Adam Rea Gaetano Borriello,Bruce Hemingway,Predrag "Pedja" Klasnja, Karl Koscher, James A. Landay,Jonathan Lester, and Danny Wyatt,Dirk Haehnel,"The Mobile Sensing Platform An Embedded Activity Recognition System",Pervasive Computing, IEEE (Volume:7, Issue:2) 4 Robert Bodor, Andrew Drenner, Michael Janssen, Paul Schrater and Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos,"Mobile Camera Positioning to Optimize the Observability of Human Activity Recognition Tasks",Intelligent Robots and Systems,2005. 2005 IEEE/RSJ International conference 5 Eunju Kim, Sumi Helal, and Diane Cook,"Human Activity Recognition and Pattern Discovery",Pervasive Computing, IEEE (Volume:9, Issue:1) 6 Kai-Tai Song and Wei-Jyun Chun, "Human Activity recognition using a mobile camera", The 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI) 7 O´ scar D. Lara and Miguel A. Labrador,"A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors",Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE (Volume:PP, Issue:99) 41 CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSION 42 8 Zhixian Yan, Vigneshwaran Subbaraju, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Archan Misra, Karl Aberer,"Energy-E cient Continuous Activity Recognition on Mobile Phones: An Activity-Adaptive Approach",Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
In this work, algorithms are developed and evaluated to detect physical
activities from data acquired using the sensors available in smart phonesaccelerometer,
gyroscopes, global positioning system (GPS), carrying it in
pockets. Data was collected from 20 subjects without supervision or observation.
Subjects were asked to perform a sequence of everyday tasks but not
told speci cally where or how to do them. Mean, energy, frequency-domain
entropy, and correlation of acceleration data was calculated and several classi
ers using these features were tested. Decision tree classi ers showed the
best performance recognizing everyday activities with an overall accuracy
rate of 84%. The results show that although some activities are recognized
well with subject-independent training data, others appear to require subjectspeci
c training data. The results suggest that multiple accelerometers aid in
recognition because conjunctions in acceleration feature values can e ectively
discriminate many activities. |
en_US |